Holger Levsen <holger <at> layer-acht.org> writes: > On Freitag, 27. Februar 2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > ISTR (some of) -legal@ saying not DFSG-compliant, > > some people on -legal will always disagree, what counts more is the (rough) > consenus...
Sure, but I thought we had an explicit consensus on discrimination against fields of endeavour, which is seen in CC-By 3.0 4.a about "effective technological measures". Happily, that's only a lawyerbomb (in that no-one, even within CC, seemed to agree what it means for debian - is offering source code enough to satisfy it?) and not a current live problem. Beware some of the "ported" CCs which include the trademark notice by mistake and produced a licence which failed to follow DFSG - and some were incompatible with other CC licences. Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray My Opinion Only, see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org