appreciate any pointers.
Regards
Jeff
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ys do the right thing. It looks as though it is much better, now.
Thanks again for the detailed explanation - and also to the others that
answered.
Regards
jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
and I can't find the
right incantation to get gsettings to tell me the default email client.
Would someone mind putting me on the right track?
Thanks and regards
Jeff
[1]https://sourceforge.net/p/gscan2pdf/feature-requests/112/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Andreas,
On 29/04/2020 12:11, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> reverse-depends -r testing -b src:gtk+2.0 2>&1 | grep gscan2pdf
> * gscan2pdf (for libgail-common)
> * gscan2pdf (for libgail-common)
Thanks!
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Desc
ions in
stable, testing and unstable are Perl packages which use libgtk3-perl.
Can you explain?
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
o
try it.
The user has confirmed that this solves the problem. Thanks for your help.
> Either way I'd recommend reporting the absence of g_set_prgname() as a bug
> (or at least a feature request), since it's sometimes necessary to control
> what GLib thinks the program'
name() is not in the Perl bindings for
glib (yet).
I'll add it, and confirm whether g_set_prgname() fixes the problem when
the updated bindings have filtered down to the users.
Thanks for all the help.
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 02/01/2020 16:53, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> @Jeff Did your changes include adding a launchable tag? If not, adding
> one may already fix this issue.
Yes, I had.
> When transitioning:
> 1) Make sure you add a launchable tag - it may not be essential, but
> it certainly is more
pplication as a
favorite?
Regards
Jeff
[1]
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Metadata.html#tag-id-generic
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 12/09/2019 19:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> If you're a DD, then you can use the service described in
> https://debblog.philkern.de/2019/08/alpha-self-service-buildd-givebacks.html
Thanks to those who replied so quickly. The instructions worked a treat.
Regards
Jeff
si
retry the build, but my search engine foo is failing me.
How can I give back the build?
Or will it retry automatically?
Regards
Jeff
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?arch=all&pkg=gscan2pdf&ver=2.5.6-1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 01:55:58PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> GHash.hh:91:44: error: type/value mismatch at argument 1 in template
> parameter list for 'template struct std::hash'
> while (pos
is trying to use? Is that the virtual display created by Xvfb, or
> is it the actual X session you're running on?
Inside xvfb it is now :99
Before I tried all sorts of things to get it to ignore :0.
Thanks for all the pointers.
Dunno what was going on.
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Des
tuff like this. See
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Prefix
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ed when I call it from the wrapper?
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 29/07/17 03:31, Paul Wise wrote:
> This sounds like an Xorg/nouveau bug, please do report it:
>
> http://x.debian.net/howto/report-bugs.html
I did that six months ago:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857620
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPG
.
Running the test outside the chroot with xvfb still crashes X, because
xvfb seems to grab the "real" X if it is there.
Is there a way of getting xvfb to ignore the system X?
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
f Debian. Only once Stretch is released will
"testing" (which will then be known by the codename "Buster") start
getting new versions from "unstable".
Jeff
testing, I tried sbuilding libsecret. So far, 2/2 builds failed.
# grep ^FAIL libsecret_*.build
libsecret_i386-2017-02-17T14:42:53Z.build:FAIL: test-collection 18
/collection/delete-sync
libsecret_i386-2017-02-17T14:50:00Z.build:FAIL: test-collection 18
/collection/delete-sync
Jeff
I think these changes are both deliberate and
documented in the release notes.
Jeff
.g.,
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671785#48
Jeff
"Being that the current year is almost 2016 and is 20 years after Debian
started"
Yes, let's rename a project because of an arbitrary date. That makes
perfect sense. No it doesn't, that is absurd.
"because having the project named after a white supremacist"
Those are some pretty serious accusati
n't see this
rule mentioned specifically.
Is this a rule or just a very strong preference?
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:19:30PM -0600, Jeff Epler wrote:
> * foomodule is a Python wrapper for libfoo, so it must be shipped
>as a .so, but if it links libfoo.a, and libfoo.a is not -fPIC,
>it is not possible to build foomodule at all
>
>(The same goes for wrapp
y was
written.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150219231930.gb37...@unpythonic.net
g to the specified --uid/--gid?
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150212022643.ga62...@unpythonic.net
,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_Broadcast_Broadband_TV#Security_Concerns
for just one problem that arises when you assume that an adversary is
willing to aim a low-power broadcast at your antenna.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140720134746.gb87...@unpythonic.net
a way to say this in aptitude to directly say what
you want.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140714172947.gb6...@unpythonic.net
ctually used by current versions of apt. (ideally you'd just go sha256,
but iirc it's the md5sum that is used in practice, even today. but
please find that thread, don't trust my summary)
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
For software that is incompatible with pulseaudio, prefix the command
with 'pasuspender':
$ pasuspender oss-or-alsa-only-program args...
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
dependencies that were just built in the previous
step(s)
Initially setting up dput with mini-dinstall is documented, though I
didn't take the time to google up a tutorial for you.
Best of luck.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
of *not* defining this
sn?printf extension and fixing packages where we encounter use of
this idiom.
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-crime-law-part-1-no-prison-time-for-violating-terms-of-service
Based on the scenario you describe, and if the communication passed
through a system under US jurisdiction, you might be in violation of
this stupid law.
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
db) others
have recently filled in another missing piece with jdk7 support and I
generally get the sense that there is a core of smart people who are
dedicated to kfreebsd.
The idea that somehow users of non-linux kernels don't matter or don't
even exist as debian users is one of the most
more equal^Wreal than others.
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ld-id=none ...
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dmitry,
Pylucene is an incredibly useful package. The very best thing is for me to
no longer be involved as a maintainer for pylucene. But in the short term,
if you want or need me to sponsor an upload, I can do so as early as
tomorrow. Let me know.
ll depends on Python 2.5 so can't be
> installed at all. Bugreport about this was filled almost a year ago
> (#632240).
>
> Looks like the latest information from Jeff (current maintainer) was in
> 2010 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518623#10):
>
> >
On 06/01/2011 07:25 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
so in _that_ regard, the question becomes: "are the efforts of the
free software community better off being spent elsewhere"? and "what
benefit is there *TO THE FREE SOFTWARE COMMUNITY* of doing LSB for
ARM"? forget the proprietary j
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 01:14, Neil Williams wrote:
>> * Firmware is:
>> * Derived from proprietary unpublished source code,
> electrical equipment or hardware tools, not text editors. As such, not
> all firmware can be expected to have any source code. In this case, as
> we have a decla
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeff Licquia
* Package name: python-pip
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Ian Bicking
* URL : http://pip.openplans.org/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Alternative Python package
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 18:41, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whoever the copyright holder of that work is (I read your remark above
> to mean that the hardware manufacturer is that copyright holder),
> there must be a "preferred form of the work for making modifications
> to it". What fo
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 00:31, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we use the "preferred form of the work for making modifications to
> it" definition of source code, what is the form that best meets that
> definition?
>
> What form of the work do the copyright holders use to make changes t
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 03:10, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just want to find out: Under what circumstances does the blob need to
> be modified and who gets to do that modification?
Probably only the hardware engineers.
> Are these "chip manufacturer tools" physical tools/machine
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 05:36, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> similar tools to modify the blob (even if it is only useful to do so on
>> a different board / with a different chipset)?
>
> Ish. Someone else should be able to use the same tools (barring
> development environment issues) b
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:26, Lennart Sorensen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would expect anything on opencores.org to be perfectly readable VHDL
Hardly perfectly readable - I put up code there too :)
> code, which is the prefered format for manipulating it. So what was
> your point again? B
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:35, Lennart Sorensen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 06:38:53PM -0700, Jeff Carr wrote:
>> Because that's how the hardware works. If you are making a widget and
>> you need a fpga or hybrid chip of any sort, then you gener
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 07:21, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Your argument boils down to: There is function that will never
> be supported by free software. Annoying people by asking them to expose
> their function by freeing the software just irritates them, so we
> shou
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 09:21, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can that be? (That is an ernest question)
Because that's how the hardware works. If you are making a widget and
you need a fpga or hybrid chip of any sort, then you generate a binary
blob using the chip manufacturers too
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 22:22, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It should not take us an indefinite time to release with
> firmware blobs gone. I'll stake my reutation that the period involved
> is not indefinite, and there is a upper boundary to it.
>
>Testing out th
that is so, however apt-mirror is scripted so one could also argue
that this expectation is unjustified.
Thanks for your thoughts and your time,
Jeff.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
where as if you package it
for just Rails, other Ruby users may be missing out.
.Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vincent Danjean wrote:
For me, papi is a library with its tools to access hardware performance
counters. It used a lot on some plateform (NUMA, ...) to analyze the
performance of HPC programs.
Google with "papi" give this link in first :
http://icl.cs.utk.edu/papi/
This software is not packaged
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: papi
Version : 1.0 beta
Upstream Author : Norm Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/openprinting
* License : Mostly CDDL (some LG
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: virtualenv
Version : 0.8.1
Upstream Author : Ian Bicking
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/virtualenv/
* License : MIT-style
Programming Lang: Python
Descr
On 01/16/07 20:22, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Thus their goal is to help win market share,
That's an important goal.
Have you heard this before: the fear is that not gaining significant
market share will allow Microsoft to effectively render free software
unusable by the average user.
> not to he
On 01/17/07 00:22, Loïc Minier wrote:
> The Debian menu system is completely useless to me, and I expect to
> most GNOME and KDE users.
You've hit the nail on the head. That whole thing came about from
earlier times. I wish you every luck in purging it from existence.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
nd you details of any corrigenda
"""
The 009695399 in the www.opengroup.org URI looks to be a publication
number of some sort (one digit shy of an ISBN though); it is used by the
wikipedia entry (where I first found it), and the similar 9-digit bit of
the URL in the Debian susv3 in
the original definition is now somewhat archaic. Amateur
Radio, however, is the more formal and widely accepted term.
3. http://www.arrl.org/
4. http://www.arrl.org/pio/bwhatis.html -- See Section 5
-Jeff
KE7FRJ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I've created a mod_annodex package for Ubuntu, and I would love to see it in
Debian. Anyone want to lend a hand? :-)
deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~jdub/dapper/ ./
deb-src http://people.ubuntu.com/~jdub/dapper/ ./
Thanks,
- Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
of 127.0.0.1 to return localhost? That is, localhost
shall precede any other aliases in /etc/hosts.
Again, thank you. Attention to detail is quite important; in this case
detail is the location and/or existence of a mere 21 bytes.
-Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ults in the resolver properly
returning localhost when resolving 127.0.0.1.
In summary: (1) It's reasonable to expect DNS and file based resolution
to function the same in regard to 127.0.0.1/localhost (proper DNS
resolution of 127.0.0.1 is documented in RFC 1912). (2) There is a long
histor
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 23:04 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 08 October 2005 22:07, Jeff Stevens wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 16:26 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > "localhost.localdomain" and "localhost" must be swapped. The first
> > entry
"localhost".
Just as a sanity check, Solaris ships with:
127.0.0.1 localhost loghost
FreeBSD ships with:
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.my.domain myname.my.domain
I don't have access to AIX, HPUX or other major Unices, but I bet in the
hosts file, 127.0.0.1 is immediately
On 08/15/2005 01:16 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Jeff Carr wrote:
>
>> I hope a developer out there with access to commit packages can take the
>> initiative to package up agentcell. The authors settled on releasing
>> this software package und
I hope a developer out there with access to commit packages can take the
initiative to package up agentcell. The authors settled on releasing
this software package under the GPL. It's a great contribution to the
scientific community.
Just thought I'd pass on the word,
Jeff
--
To U
licensed under the GPL and should be included in Debian.
No codecs are packaged inside of transcode & it is completely usable
with OGG/OGM.
Jeff
PS: of interest to the mplayer thread: motion.c allows mpeg-1 & mpeg-2
support for non-commercial software. AKA: GPL/LGPL'd implemen
ing through the queue so fast)
- David Nusinow
OK, that's great to know. Well, I hope mplayer gets some renewed
attention then.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the work of cleaning up mplayer. I hope it gets
included soon.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:57:02PM -0700, Jeff Carr wrote:
Could someone give us a simple rundown of how we would submit a patch to
the debian kernel sources to add spca5xx support? The spca5xx driver
adds support for a large number of USB cameras. Recently Carlos posted
;smart" in that it uses `uname -r`
to determine the kernel headers. So, one can just go into the dir and
type make;make install and spca5xx.ko will automatically be loaded the
next time the user boots.
So I guess I should start by looking at the files in
/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.11/
uggesting that the bar has been raised so high; the
standard and expectations set at such a lofty level that the general
public might be better served by a more detailed explanation of the
releases and the dangers. Again, like the text Adrian wrote a few emails
back I think is perfect and
rts each version of their enterprice
edition for seven years.
I didn't know they had pledged to do that. Interesting.
How many days does it take in the US until a bank is bankrupt after a
critical part of their computer infrastructure is broken?
I don't know. Maybe we should run a test :)
Jeff
orate enviornment and the kinds of complaints that have been used
against debian deployment.
Enjoy,
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ct method of doing things here. Does it sound like I
almost understand it right now?
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; and the only "stable" version of debian is ancient and
too old to use.
Enjoy,
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ne symlinks. Almost everyone I know uses sid; I don't think
anyone is going to switch to sarge once sid is out.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l
2) the /usr/lib/libsilc* symlinks are not correct
(wrong names or missing needed names)
3) /usr/lib/libsilcclient-1.0.so.2.1.0 is not the right name
4) the package itself is not the right name
curiously,
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carlos C Soto wrote:
Great!
I use this module and wold be great to have it on debian.
I was thinking on put a RFP bug for it.
-- Carlos C Soto :: eclipxe
I agree. I just built it again today against 2.6.11-1-686-smp (after
using it for several months against 2.6.10-1-686-smp).
I talked to the dev
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: flumotion
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Johan Dahlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.fluendo.com/
* License : GPL
Description : Fluendo Streaming Server for audio and video
Flumotion is a modern
[ I'm not subbed to -devel, this was pulled from the archive -- please Cc me
on replies ]
Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Primitive? heh. And as for the rest, I haven't had trouble -- it's
> > just an infocmp away.
[ I'm not subbed to -devel, this was pulled from the archive -- please Cc me
on replies ]
Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Primitive? heh. And as for the rest, I haven't had trouble -- it's
> > just an infocmp away.
[ I'm not subbed to -devel, this was pulled from the archive -- please Cc me
on replies ]
Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Primitive? heh. And as for the rest, I haven't had trouble -- it's
> > just an infocmp away.
Eduard Bloch wrote:
> * Jeff Teunissen [Thu, Oct 07 2004, 09:10:56AM]:
[snip]
> > > Who said that the "linux" console is a good kind of terminal
> > > emulation?
> >
> > It's what's expected.
>
> By whom?
By people who spend a lot of
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Jeff Teunissen [Thu, 07 Oct 2004 03:52:37 -0400]:
>
> > What DOES bug me is mindlessly adding "gnustep-" to the names of all
> > packages that use it, because most of the developers of those packages
> > have dick to do with some myth
Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> #include
> * Jeff Teunissen [Thu, Oct 07 2004, 02:20:31AM]:
>
> > > If we are going to allow generic names, then obviously they would be
> > > applied to the most commonly used or "best for the novice" example,
> > > so
Petri Latvala wrote:
[fixing attributions]
> On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 09:20, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
> > [Steve Greenland wrote:]
> > > On 06-Oct-04, 06:41 (CDT), Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > And developers writing with GNUstep recognize the s
(Note: I'm not subscribed to -devel, only -private and d-d-a, so please Cc
me on replies -- this text is copied from the web archives, which is the
reason the references are gone)
Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 06-Oct-04, 06:41 (CDT), Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Miles Bader wrote:
> Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > For me, I don't want GNUstep in the names of my programs because I am
> > not connected to GNUstep and don't want to be. It is just a couple of
> > libraries that I use to write my apps -- yo
Frank Küster wrote:
> Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Frank Küster wrote:
> >
> >> If I'm wrong, I apologize and will not object against cddb.bundle (at
> >> least not because of this. Still the ".bundle" part is meanin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: susv2
Upstream Author : Copyright (c) 2001-2003 IEEE and The Open Group
* License : Installer Package: Public Domain
Description : Fetch and install SUSv2 documentation
This package was created at the request of Andrew Josey fro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: susv3
Upstream Author : Copyright (c) 2001-2003 IEEE and The Open Group
* License : Installer Package: Public Domain
Description : Fetch and install SUSv3 documentation
This package was created at the request of Andrew Josey fro
Frank Küster wrote:
> Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:27:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> >> > For example, "camera" package name was changed to "camera.app" to
> >> > prevent namespace pollution. Are you
it likely ever run on i386. We're
i486 (with a co-processor) and above.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
You said homosexuals form a small percentage of the population. So
do Jews. Is that a reason to deny someone equality?
- Richard Marceau
> I just wanted to wish all those who celebrate Thanks Giving today and wish
> everyone a happy and safe day. Eat lots of turkey...drink lots of
> beer...and watch football!
And, for the Americans in the crowd: http://gnome.org/
- Jeff
--
"PHP, when it first came out, didn
ead of apt-src perhaps? (As I noticed that it creates it's
own entry in /etc/apt/sources)
Jeff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Aug 25 05:40:57 2002
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 4964 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2002 10:40:57 -
Received: from master.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2002 10:40:57 -
Received: from (buddy) [61.14
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Aug 25 03:54:06 2002
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 23287 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2002 08:54:06 -
Received: from master.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2002 08:54:06 -
Received: from (buddy) [61.1
ut I've been intending
to move to it as soon as it's even minimally ready.
If you have the feeling that it will take longer than 6 months to hit
unstable, then you should maybe nudge me to write a patch for you. =)
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I reincarnated for this?
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
