t's really
only about 50 years old and still under copyright.
dave...
--
David Schleef
Big Kitten LLC (http://www.bigkitten.com/) -- data acquisition on Linux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:03:42AM +, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> Yes, you are being absurd. Since you are presumably not understanding the
> point, let me explain more clearly:
>
> Pornography is widely regarded as being demeaning and insulting to women.
Is this among people who are associated
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:22:49PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:00:01PM +0900, Takuo KITAME wrote:
> > According to buildd.d.o, mozilla-firebird fails to build on arm.
>
> From the build log:
>
> Linux2.4_arm_glibc_PTH_OPT.OBJ/shlibsign -v -i
> /buil
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 06:19:16PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.08.24.1806 +0200]:
> > the right place is /lib/modules/${kver}/${package}
>
> says who?
It's always been this way. However, before 2.4, modutils had a set
list of directorie
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:36:55AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:15:58PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> There are currently 5 packages in unstable that dump plugins under
> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, not to mention several more contrib/non-free
> installers that do the same t
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:53:55AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 02:34:56PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> | The Debian Social Contract says "Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software".
> | If there are things "in Debian" that are "not free" or "not software",
> | then we
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 07:00:21PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> >
> > static inline _Atomic_word
> > __attribute__ ((__unused__))
> > __exchange_and_add (volatile _Atomic_word *__mem, int __val)
> > {
> >register _Atomic_word __result;
> >__asm_
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 12:20:04AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 04:21:17 -0500
>
> > >> I have an impression that such Policy understanding prevents sane
> > >>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:05:35PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > #87667 gstreamerfiled: 546, changed 546
> >
> > As an example, this package was uploaded to experimental on friday,
> > and has been packaged upstream for about a year. It was last changed
> > 62 da
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:30:13PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> At te moment, there are a lot of old ITP's hanging around in the WNPP,
> with (seemingly) nothing happening to them. In order to clean out the
> WNPP, I intend to rename the ITP's that have been open longer than 1 year
> to RFP's. T
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 01:27:37PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 08:03:48PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Steve Langasek writes:
> > > * In these cases, having a package whose soname is compatible with the
> > > rest of the world is considered more important than provi
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 09:44:16AM +0900, YAEGASHI Takeshi wrote:
>
> Yes, for embedded platforms with limited resources cross compling is
> quite important, especially when you want to build a large set of
> software such as Debian distrubution.
>
> But as you know we currently have much troubul
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 09:47:05AM +0200, Dominik Kubla wrote:
>
> But the whole discussion here is folly. The whole thing has been discussed
> on linux-kernel by people far more knowlegable in this things than the
> average debian developer. I think we should follow the conclusions
> from that d
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:32:59AM +0530, Viral wrote:
> > As long as it isn't too bothersome for you, would you mind explaining why
> > the kernel doesn't activate it by default? Or why it isn't a `make config'
> > option? And why is a daemon needed for it?
>
> No, its not bothersome to explain.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:00:49PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:19:56AM -0700, David Schleef wrote:
> It could also be useful as a hardware tester at install time:
> > "Would you like to test your hardware (and get a kernel custom
> > build for yo
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:13:01PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> So a 386 compiled kernel can still support MMX, 3DNow! and MTRR? In that
> case we only need a 386 kernel, but it might be nice to have a PentiumMMX
> compiled kernel as well (that should give better performance on all brands of
>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:15:15PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thursday 26 April 2001 09:05, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > _Afair_ it is necessary to run a k6 (or athlon) "optimized" kernel to
> > use 3DNow! in applications like xmms or lame. This probably applys to
> > ISSE, MTTR and MMX, too.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 07:30:47PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:47:44AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> >
> > what is the DIFFERENCE between kernel-headers-2.4.2 and all the other
> > 2.4.2 kernel headers packages?
>
> Kernel-headers-2.4.2 is built with the default config f
18 matches
Mail list logo
