On Nov 27, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> If the upstream tarball is in the archive, it's probably okay to retrieve one
> from there. It's not always trivial because now you need to have the right
> "deb-src" lines enabled in your apt sources.list but it's possible. But how do
It is t
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 10:31 PM Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> (replying in one email to various comments in past 24h)
>
> > How common debian/gbp.conf points at something else: perhaps gbp's
> > defaults are not good, if that many packages need to override them.
>
> First of all may I ask yo
Hi,
(replying in one email to various comments in past 24h)
> How common debian/gbp.conf points at something else: perhaps gbp's
> defaults are not good, if that many packages need to override them.
First of all may I ask you to not use terms like 'not good' as it may
come off negative towards t
Quoting Marco d'Itri (2024-11-26 23:34:24)
> On Nov 26, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Tue Nov 26, 2024 at 10:50 AM GMT, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > > Yes, as they don't enable pristine-tar
> > Is pristine-tar still valuable these days?
> Not really. The debian branches of all of my packages[1]
On Nov 26, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue Nov 26, 2024 at 10:50 AM GMT, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > Yes, as they don't enable pristine-tar
> Is pristine-tar still valuable these days?
Not really. The debian branches of all of my packages[1] are based off
the upstream git repository, which i
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 09:25:12PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > CI for a new-upstream-release commit you've pushed but haven't uploaded
> > to the Debian archive yet, because you're waiting for CI.
> >
> > pristine-tar certainly isn't the only way here (it's true that C
Colin Watson writes:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 08:49:44PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> If you haven't made an upload, then wouldn't you have the tarball
>> locally while working on preparing the upload?
>>
>> And if someone doesn't have the orig.tar.gz locally, then why would
>> anyone want
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 08:49:44PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> If you haven't made an upload, then wouldn't you have the tarball
> locally while working on preparing the upload?
>
> And if someone doesn't have the orig.tar.gz locally, then why would
> anyone want to get it from a random git re
Andrey Rakhmatullin writes:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 06:54:18PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>> > >> > Yes, as they don't enable pristine-tar
>> > >>
>> > >> Is pristine-tar still valuable these days?
>> > >
>> > > Unfortunately yes. AFAIK the two options for fixing this that are
>> > > usu
On Tuesday, November 26, 2024 12:27:22 PM MST Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:21:55PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > > > # Specify the distribution, -d
> > > > $distribution = 'unstable';
> > >
> > > Setting this will override the Distribution of the .changes file created
Hi Soren,
Quoting Soren Stoutner (2024-11-26 20:21:55)
> > Setting this will override the Distribution of the .changes file created by
> > sbuild with "unstable", ignoring what your package has set. Are you sure
> > you want this?
>
> I would like it to be able to build instead of fail when the c
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:21:55PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > > # Specify the distribution, -d
> > > $distribution = 'unstable';
> >
> > Setting this will override the Distribution of the .changes file created by
> > sbuild with "unstable", ignoring what your package has set. Are you sure yo
On Tuesday, November 26, 2024 12:23:00 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 26, 2024 3:17:45 AM MST Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> > Hi Soren,
> >
> > * Soren Stoutner [2024-11-25 16:57]:
> > >I am not able to get the example unshare .sbuildrc to work with piuparts.
> > >
> > >0m0.0s
On Tuesday, November 26, 2024 3:17:45 AM MST Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Hi Soren,
>
> * Soren Stoutner [2024-11-25 16:57]:
> >I am not able to get the example unshare .sbuildrc to work with piuparts.
> >
> >0m0.0s DEBUG: Unpacking /home/soren/.cache/sbuild/unstable-amd64.tar.xz
into
> >/ tmp/tm
Johannes,
On Monday, November 25, 2024 11:37:41 PM MST Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Soren Stoutner (2024-11-26 01:07:06)
>
> > I suppose I should note that I have made a few modifications to the example
> > file because it wasn’t behaving as expected. Specifically,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 06:53:01PM +0100, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
> > One possible rebuttal to this is "gbp needs to do the right thing then".
> > Currently gbp by default generates a broken tarball, which is also a
> > source of confusion for many.
>
> Do you have a bug report number?
No.
I've
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 06:54:18PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > >> > Yes, as they don't enable pristine-tar
> > >>
> > >> Is pristine-tar still valuable these days?
> > >
> > > Unfortunately yes. AFAIK the two options for fixing this that are
> > > usually proposed are:
> > >
> > > 1) trea
* Simon Josefsson [241126 16:27]:
> Chris Hofstaedtler writes:
>
> > * Jonathan Dowland [241126 12:59]:
> >> On Tue Nov 26, 2024 at 10:50 AM GMT, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> >> > Yes, as they don't enable pristine-tar
> >>
> >> Is pristine-tar still valuable these days?
> >
> > Unfortunately
Hello Andrey,
Am 26.11.24 um 17:44 schrieb Andrey Rakhmatullin:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 04:27:37PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
One possible rebuttal to this is "gbp needs to do the right thing then".
Currently gbp by default generates a broken tarball, which is also a
source of confusion for
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian Python Team
Owner: Roland Mas
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-pycudwt
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Contact: Pierre Paleo
* URL : https://github.com/pierrepaleo/pypwt
* License : BSD-3-Cl
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 09:44:31PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> Currently gbp by default generates a broken tarball, which is also a
> source of confusion for many.
I'd dare to even call this a bug.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-ac
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 04:27:37PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> >> > Yes, as they don't enable pristine-tar
> >>
> >> Is pristine-tar still valuable these days?
> >
> > Unfortunately yes. AFAIK the two options for fixing this that are
> > usually proposed are:
> >
> > 1) treat it as a problem o
Chris Hofstaedtler writes:
> * Jonathan Dowland [241126 12:59]:
>> On Tue Nov 26, 2024 at 10:50 AM GMT, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
>> > Yes, as they don't enable pristine-tar
>>
>> Is pristine-tar still valuable these days?
>
> Unfortunately yes. AFAIK the two options for fixing this that are
>
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 11:59:26AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > Yes, as they don't enable pristine-tar
>
> Is pristine-tar still valuable these days?
Extremely, unless your workflow requires using something else to get the
upstream tarball from the archive (among other less important
requir
* Jonathan Dowland [241126 12:59]:
> On Tue Nov 26, 2024 at 10:50 AM GMT, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > Yes, as they don't enable pristine-tar
>
> Is pristine-tar still valuable these days?
Unfortunately yes. AFAIK the two options for fixing this that are
usually proposed are:
1) treat it as a
On Tue Nov 26, 2024 at 10:50 AM GMT, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
Yes, as they don't enable pristine-tar
Is pristine-tar still valuable these days?
and cannot guess your branch naming system.
I haven't checked, but in an ideal world gbp would default to the same
values for these as described
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 08:51:43AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> How common debian/gbp.conf points at something else: perhaps gbp's defaults
> are not good, if that many packages need to override them.
Yes, as they don't enable pristine-tar and cannot guess your branch naming
system.
--
WBR,
I tried to find a blocking bug before my question on debian-devel, but
I could not find any bug which justifies the delay.
Note that Ubuntu 24.04 LTS also already uses GnuPG 2.4.x, so I do not
expect a problem with the Debian tooling base like dpkg and apt.
Regards
signature.asc
Description: Th
Hi Soren,
* Soren Stoutner [2024-11-25 16:57]:
I am not able to get the example unshare .sbuildrc to work with piuparts.
0m0.0s DEBUG: Unpacking /home/soren/.cache/sbuild/unstable-amd64.tar.xz into /
tmp/tmplbhnn26l
0m0.0s DEBUG: Starting command: ['tar', '-C', '/tmp/tmplbhnn26l', '--auto-
com
Le mardi 26 novembre 2024, 00:29:40 UTC Guillem Jover a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 16:09:42 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > Le dimanche 24 novembre 2024, 12:06:26 UTC Bastien Roucariès a écrit :
> > > I plan to implement freestanding architecture specification.
> > > Following Tou
On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 1:15 PM Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
>
> Dear fellow developers and Plasma users,
>
> after some months living in experimental and lots of positive feedback, we're
> about to upload Plasma 6 to unstable.
> The plans of the Qt / KDE team is to release Trixie with :
> - Qt 5
On Fri Nov 22, 2024 at 11:29 AM GMT, Simon Josefsson wrote:
I thought about the gbp aspect of the lets-move-things-to-salsa and I
suggest to consider if they are better left orthogonal. Could you make
one DEP for lets-move-to-salsa and one DEP for
lets-document-a-build-workflow?
I haven't read
On Thu Nov 21, 2024 at 4:10 AM GMT, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
There is a debian/gbp.conf in 13573 packages in Debian
This is an interesting proxy measure for the prevalence of gbp usage. It
probably undercounts: I sometimes use gbp but I've only got this file in
one of my sources (one I recently
33 matches
Mail list logo