Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: python-qcli
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Greg Caporaso
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/qcli
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : separated module of pyqi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-nose-exclude
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Kurt Grandis
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/nose-exclude
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : exclude s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Paul Tagliamonte
* Package name: codespell
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Lucas De Marchi
* URL : https://github.com/lucasdemarchi/codespell/
* License : GPLv2
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 07:26:37AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
> > is there a proper way to get rid of the recent
> > privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error report [1] ?
>
> Same as with every issue in upstream code, report it t
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 07:34:03AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > I have no problem with automatically updating config.guess/sub but I
> > have one with automatic autoreconf: as automake doesn't seem to care
> > about forward or backward-compati
Hi,
On 26/12/13 00:26, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>> is there a proper way to get rid of the recent
>> privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error report [1] ?
>
> Same as with every issue in upstream code, report it to upstream and
> get
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> I have no problem with automatically updating config.guess/sub but I
> have one with automatic autoreconf: as automake doesn't seem to care
> about forward or backward-compatibility, using autoreconf will lead to
> additional work for the ma
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> is there a proper way to get rid of the recent
> privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error report [1] ?
Same as with every issue in upstream code, report it to upstream and
get them to fix it, sending a patch if you are able. Tha
Thanks for the hints and the scripts.
I am on my way to update my package.
On 25/12/13 22:46, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jerome BENOIT
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 25/12/13 22:04, Dominik George wr
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 25/12/13 22:04, Dominik George wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
is there a proper way to get rid of the recent
privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error repo
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25/12/13 22:04, Dominik George wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> is there a proper way to get rid of the recent
>>> privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error report [1] ?
>>
>> obviously, remove all Adsense and related spyware fetc
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25/12/13 22:04, Dominik George wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> is there a proper way to get rid of the recent
>>> privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error report [1] ?
>>
>> obviously, remove all Adsense and related spyware fetc
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Has anyone asked the Git maintainers whether they object to their software
> being linked with a libcurl that uses OpenSSL?
I am not the author of the most of Git. As a minority author:
- libcurl provides a quite similar API with OpenSSL as with GnuTLS.
I wish it provi
Hi,
> Obviously, but the problem is that the involved html pages correspond to
> the manual of my package so it sounds not reasonable to wipe them out:
> is there any tools that may help to clean up the corrupted html pages ?
I assume there are Adsense images included from the HTML docs in your
p
Hi,
On 25/12/13 22:04, Dominik George wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> is there a proper way to get rid of the recent
>> privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error report [1] ?
>
> obviously, remove all Adsense and related spyware fetching code from
> your package.
Obviously, but the problem is tha
Hi,
> is there a proper way to get rid of the recent
> privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error report [1] ?
obviously, remove all Adsense and related spyware fetching code from
your package.
Cheers,
Nik
--
* concerning Mozilla code leaking assertion failures to tty without D-BUS
Hello List,
is there a proper way to get rid of the recent
privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error report [1] ?
Thnaks inadvance,
Jerome
[1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/privacy-breach-google-adsense.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
❦ 25 décembre 2013 12:41 CET, Clint Byrum :
>> > Don't you think it would be more reasonable if the mariadb-client
>> > contained a Provides: mysql-client, rather than changing each and every
>> > software dependency in Debian?
>>
>> Maybe MariaDB wants to be the "default" MySQL implementation?
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:36:34 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> I, too, believe that we could use the reality check. We already did so
>> with our patent policy and solved long-standing problems for our users.
>
> Well, I'm not sure what problems that patent policy actually solved for
> our users.
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 03:41 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Vincent Bernat's message of 2013-12-25 03:36:30 -0800:
> > ❦ 25 décembre 2013 08:27 CET, Thomas Goirand :
> >
> > > Don't you think it would be more reasonable if the mariadb-client
> > > contained a Provides: mysql-client, ra
Excerpts from Vincent Bernat's message of 2013-12-25 03:36:30 -0800:
> ❦ 25 décembre 2013 08:27 CET, Thomas Goirand :
>
> > Don't you think it would be more reasonable if the mariadb-client
> > contained a Provides: mysql-client, rather than changing each and every
> > software dependency in Deb
On 12/25/2013 05:50 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/25/2013 08:46 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> And overriding the *entire* service file seems excessive if you wish to
>>> override just one line of the package's service file.
>>
>> And also, systemd would be the only package behaving t
❦ 25 décembre 2013 12:32 CET, Vincent Bernat :
> If we get automatic config.guess/sub handling by dh, maybe we could just
> libtool-generated files as well?
... we could just "patch" libtool-generated files ...
--
Don't patch bad code - rewrite it.
- The Elements of Programming St
❦ 25 décembre 2013 08:27 CET, Thomas Goirand :
> Don't you think it would be more reasonable if the mariadb-client
> contained a Provides: mysql-client, rather than changing each and every
> software dependency in Debian?
Maybe MariaDB wants to be the "default" MySQL implementation?
--
Make su
❦ 24 décembre 2013 18:33 CET, Colin Watson :
> Mostly the patches I've sent for these things have either been ignored
> until NMUed, or applied without complaint, but I've found that I've
> ended up in arguments with a small number of maintainers who have (IMO)
> irrational objections to updatin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Piotr Roszatycki
* Package name: gitprep
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Yuki Kimoto
* URL : http://gitprep.org/
* License : Artistic or GPL+2
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Git repository management applic
On 12/25/2013 08:46 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> And overriding the *entire* service file seems excessive if you wish to
>> override just one line of the package's service file.
>
> And also, systemd would be the only package behaving this way, which is
> counter-intuitive for our users. I'd even
On 24 December 2013 20:10, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 05:33:56PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>> Generally agreed, although I believe you have to be somewhat careful
>> when using it in combination with dh-autoreconf
> dh-autoreconf(7) says "you do not need --with=autotools_
28 matches
Mail list logo
