On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 07:26:37AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > > > is there a proper way to get rid of the recent > > privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error report [1] ? > > Same as with every issue in upstream code, report it to upstream and > get them to fix it, sending a patch if you are able. That way Debian > helps the free software community as a whole, which we promised to do > in our social contract: > > http://www.debian.org/social_contract
I tend to agree. However, what would be doubleplusgood would be to get the tools like sphinx, doxygen, and friends to not insert the code when we're building a .deb - perhaps we should look at killing this bug in generated code by forcing the generated code to suck less. Much love, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
