Thank you for submitting your letter for publication. It will be considered in
due course.
John Lee,
Letters Editor,
South China Morning Post
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
]] "Eugene V. Lyubimkin"
Hi,
| On 2011-04-27 20:14, Adam Borowski wrote:
| > > First, this statement is not true because other package managers
| > > exist.
| >
| > You mean, one could manually hunt down and locate a .deb file, wget
| > then feed it to dpkg?
|
| Well, yes, one can. I did it on
[Jonathan Nieder]
> libc6 (>= 2.3.4),
> libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1),
> libstdc++6 (>= 4.5),
> zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.2.3)
>
> It would create a false sense of security regarding use of those
> packages without configuring apt. If apt is in the middle of an
> upgrade, packages that it
Hi,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Are there any real drawbacks? Would it cause worse behaviour or problems
> for the error-rewind paths if either the pre-deps, or apt fails to install,
> as compared with the current status-quo?
Based on the list
libc6 (>= 2.3.4),
libgcc1
Saliec rokas ap apaļumiem puspilkai sievietei,
iegādājies labu dzērienu pie bāra un pavēro izcilu šovu..
Tikko atvērts un pikants klubs gaida tevi un tavus draugus - mēs nesortējam
viesus, mums katrs ir īpašs: vai no Latvijas, vai Beirutas.
Fiksētas cenas, vācu menedžeri - detaļas uzzini šeit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Moog
* Package name: nzbget
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Andrei Prygounkov
* URL : http://nzbget.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : A command-line based binary new
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: ADIOS
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : UT-BATTELLE, LLC
Homepage: http://www.olcf.ornl.gov/center-projects/adios/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, Fortran
Description : ADIOS
Apliec rokas ap gurniem puspilkai sekserītei,
nolūko labu drinku bārā un noskaties elpu aizraujošu šovu..
Jauns un izaicinošs klubs gaida tevi - mēs nešķirojam savus klientus, mums
katrs ir sevišķs: vai no Baltijas, vai ārvalstīm.
Cenas - pa kabatai katram, vāciešu menedžments - sīkāk skaties
On 2011-04-27, sean finney wrote:
> * unstable always feeds to testing
> * "release N" == "testing", until the "freeze".
> * when "freezing" for "release N"
>* "testing" is pointed at "release N+1", and no longer automatically
> feeds "release N".
[...]
>* RM's can still choose to
True, it was already pointed that kfreebsd* is the rare case. s/fixed/checked/
in my previous text and attach your bullet.
Ondřej Surý
On 27.4.2011, at 20:16, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> 4. Build-Depends - Depends (aka invalid listing in Buil
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:10:27PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Roger Leigh]
> > This also permits the mount options for filesystems mounted in the
> > initramfs (e.g. /dev, /run, /sys, /proc etc.) to be set in
> > /etc/fstab; the filesystems are remounted with the options from
> > /etc/fsta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: ampliconnoise
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ampliconnoise
* License : GPL
Description : clean up high-throughput sequencing data
AmpliconNoise is a package of applications to clean up high-th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessandro Ghedini
* Package name: libdevel-patchperl-perl
Version : 0.30
Upstream Author : Chris Williams
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-PatchPerl/
* License : GPL-1+ or Artistic
Programming Lang: Perl
De
On 2011-04-27 13:46, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > [1] If we count the situation for resuming broken upgrade, there is a
> > some chance you'll have to call dpkg manually or some hacks
> > to proceed anyway.
>
> Not always. There are states dpkg goes through that 'apt-get install'
> can "recover" fr
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:34, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> On 2011-04-27 14:53, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> I hereby request comments on changing APT to pre-depend on
>> ${shlibs:Depends}.
>
>> When we upload a new version of APT, depending on a newer
>> library version (due to
[Roger Leigh]
> This also permits the mount options for filesystems mounted in the
> initramfs (e.g. /dev, /run, /sys, /proc etc.) to be set in
> /etc/fstab; the filesystems are remounted with the options from
> /etc/fstab if already mounted during rcS. The mount options for /run
> are also made
On 2011-04-27 20:14, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > First, this statement is not true because other package managers exist.
>
> You mean, one could manually hunt down and locate a .deb file, wget then
> feed it to dpkg?
Well, yes, one can. I did it once in the past.
But the point was there are other h
First, +1 to the Pre-Depends. I think it's well-justified here.
[Eugene V. Lyubimkin]
> Second, why the APT's ability to upgrade is broken under these
> conditions? Unless I'm missing something, the upgrade cannot be
> started in the middle of another upgrade [1].
> [1] If we count the situatio
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> I hereby request comments on changing APT to pre-depend on
> ${shlibs:Depends}. The reason is simple:
>
> When we upload a new version of APT, depending on a newer
> library version (due to new symbols, whatever), and APT gets
>
On 2011-04-27 19:54, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > > I hereby request comments on changing APT to pre-depend on
> > > ${shlibs:Depends}.
> >
> > > When we upload a new version of APT, depending on a newer
> > > library version (due to new symbols, whatever), and APT gets
> > >
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> 4. Build-Depends - Depends (aka invalid listing in Build-Depends)
> http://wiki.debian.org/BerkeleyDB/InvalidBuild-Depends
>
> Packages in list 4 should be fixed because it means either one of:
>
> 1. The Build-Depends listing is erroneous (f.e. upstream
Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb brian m. carlson:
> This isn't very clear. The OpenPGP standard doesn't specify a fixed
> ordering for user IDs, so the order in which the user IDs for a given
> key are written is undefined. If they're written from a hash/map whose
> ordering changes every time it
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:34:35PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> On 2011-04-27 14:53, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > I hereby request comments on changing APT to pre-depend on
> > ${shlibs:Depends}.
>
> > When we upload a new version of APT, depending on a newer
> > library v
On Mi, 2011-04-27 at 19:34 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2011-04-27 14:53, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > I hereby request comments on changing APT to pre-depend on
> > ${shlibs:Depends}.
>
> > When we upload a new version of APT, depending on a newer
> > library
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> This branch of the thread was NOT about packages that use date ONLY. Maybe
> that's what you were confused about above? The version would still need the
> last release name too, as in 15.3.2~rc3+svn2005010112.
The two possibilities showed up in the thr
Hi Mehdi,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:58:46PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Funny… reading your recent blogpost, you seem to not understand yet what
> you want to put into Rolling (and how). So, how can we comment on
> something that's not set or clearly described yet? Make a plan first, ask
> for q
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:30:05AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bastien ROUCARIES writes:
>
> >> Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to
> >> bother. Seems like a waste of time to me. If I were going to port to any
> >> other crypto library, I'd port to gcrypto,
Stephen Kitt writes:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:51:53 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:29:39PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > I would rather add a new architecture to dpkg for this. This does not
>> > mean that debian has to create a new port or that the packages
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, James Vega wrote:
> Why assume the first version will be >= 1.x? It's not uncommon to use
> 0.x. Using 0~YYMMDD seems a safer option to reduce the chance of
> needing an epoch if/when upstream starts using actual version numbers.
The 0.DATE thing is from before we had suppor
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:23:10AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> An update on /run:
>
> sysvinit/initscripts 2.88dsf-13.4 is now available in experimental.
> If you haven't tested it yet, now would be a good time before it
> goes into unstable. Additionally, if you wish to transition
Hi,
On 2011-04-27 14:53, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> I hereby request comments on changing APT to pre-depend on
> ${shlibs:Depends}.
> When we upload a new version of APT, depending on a newer
> library version (due to new symbols, whatever), and APT gets
> unpacked befor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: charls
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Jan de Vaan
* URL : http://charls.codeplex.com
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : An optimized implementation of the JP
Bastien ROUCARIES writes:
>> Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to
>> bother. Seems like a waste of time to me. If I were going to port to any
>> other crypto library, I'd port to gcrypto, not NSS.
> See also that suse consider to port to nss
> http://old-en.
On 13/04/2011 14:21, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, sean finney wrote:
>> I don't think I've heard anything back from anyone who's actually on
>> the release team regarding this, but if they were at least non-comittedly
>> open to the idea, I'd be willing to throw my hat into the rin
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 04:09:48PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> ~ sorts after ., so "0~110427" will be considered newer than "0.1".
> Therefore,
> the 0 in 0~YYMMDD is meaningless, and would be no better than ~YYMMDD (which
> would still sort after 0.1, and require an epoch).
>
From Policy [1], ~
Jon Dowland (27/04/2011):
> ~ sorts after ., so "0~110427" will be considered newer than "0.1".
> Therefore, the 0 in 0~YYMMDD is meaningless, and would be no better
> than ~YYMMDD (which would still sort after 0.1, and require an
> epoch).
$ dpkg --compare-versions 0~110427 '<<' 0.1 && echo "Jon
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:31:22PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> Why assume the first version will be >= 1.x? It's not uncommon to use
> 0.x. Using 0~YYMMDD seems a safer option to reduce the chance of
> needing an epoch if/when upstream starts using actual version numbers.
~ sorts after ., so "0~1
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:28:35AM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > On 2011-04-26, Torsten Werner wrote:
> >> the first UID with an email address is used by dak.
> >
> > The "first" being the one with the newest self-sig?
>
> No, just the 'first' o
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:31:22PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:28:07PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > In this sense, most reasonable solution seems to me
> >
> > 0.YYMMDD
> >
> > This way, when ever upstream decide to release package with sane
> > versioning (usually big
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 06:31:38PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>Hi,
>
>In order to manage package file name length below 90 and to have sane
>screen for package management, may I suggest to recommend some limits
>(for lintian check etc.):
>
> * package name string should be less than 40 characters.
>
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 13:21 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 27.04.2011 11:09, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Since the code snippet you quoted will accept a match for either the
> > "real name" part or the email part, you could just add a
On Mi, 2011-04-27 at 14:53 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hereby request comments on changing APT to pre-depend on
> ${shlibs:Depends}. The reason is simple:
>
> When we upload a new version of APT, depending on a newer
> library version (due to new symbols, whateve
Hi,
I hereby request comments on changing APT to pre-depend on
${shlibs:Depends}. The reason is simple:
When we upload a new version of APT, depending on a newer
library version (due to new symbols, whatever), and APT gets
unpacked before the library, the system's ability
Click here to view as a [1]webpage
[2][jpeg]
Join us Today at 6 PM for the Opening of the Healthy Living Week at TSC Sultan
Center Salmiya to get
FREE nutritional assessment & a chance to win FREE SPA travel packages to
London, Paris & Geneva
References
1. http://www.sultan-center.com/Defaul
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Fontaine
* Package name: slapos.tool.format
Version : 1.1-dev
Upstream Author : Vifib SARL
* URL : http://www.slapos.org
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Prepare a client for deplo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Simon,
On 27.04.2011 11:09, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Since the code snippet you quoted will accept a match for either the
> "real name" part or the email part, you could just add a secondary UID
> with the same (spelling of your) name but a Debian-s
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:40:14AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> > Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to
>> > bother. Seems like a waste of tim
Ben Finney schrieb:
>> the first UID with an email address is used by dak. It can be changed
>> manually if there is a good reason for such a change. Please file a
>> bug report against ftp.debian.org if you need such a change.
>
> Why is an additional reason needed? Why isn't it sufficient that t
> Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to
> bother. Seems like a waste of time to me. If I were going to port to any
> other crypto library, I'd port to gcrypto, not NSS.
See also that suse consider to port to nss
http://old-en.opensuse.org/SharedCertStore
Basti
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 04:15:41AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Could the Debian obituaries start including the age, and cause of death
> please. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obituary#Contents
Before demanding private information from others, you could fix your MUA
to include a name of your
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:40:14AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to
> > bother. Seems like a waste of time to me. If I were going to port to any
> > other crypto lib
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:40:14 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Bastien ROUCARIES writes:
> >
> >> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
> >> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
> >
>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bastien ROUCARIES writes:
>
>> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
>> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
>
> Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to
> bo
Hi!
Am 27.04.2011 03:00, schrieb Ben Finney:
>> Could the Debian obituaries start including the age, and cause of death
>> please. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obituary#Contents
> −1. It's not the business of the Debian project to ask such questions of
> the surviving family, nor to distribute th
Schenk moeder een abonnement op een kwaliteitsmagazine.
Je ontvangt zelf een leuk cadeau.
Bekijk hier onze nederlandstalige selectie:
http://www.abonnementen.be/moederdag
Bekijk hier onze franstalige selectie:
http://www.abonnements.be/fetedesmeres
Aanbod geldig tot 15/05/2011 of zolang de voo
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 at 22:34:23 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> Thanks for your answer. Good to hear there is at least the possibility
> to come around this issue. Now I am curious what such a good reason
> would be. Let's say would "I don't want to be spammed on my primary UID,
> hence I use for Debian
Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Arno Töll:
> I am no DM (yet), I just wanted to make things clear in advance as I
> want to approach DD signings soon.
You could create a new key for your Debian work but you would lose
existing signatures.
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ..
Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Philipp Kern:
> On 2011-04-26, Torsten Werner wrote:
>> the first UID with an email address is used by dak.
>
> The "first" being the one with the newest self-sig?
No, just the 'first' one.
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:25:30AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 27, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:20:55PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > The reason is that the kind of entities which require FIPS 140 probably
> > > also tend to require corporate vendor support, wh
On Apr 27, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:20:55PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > The reason is that the kind of entities which require FIPS 140 probably
> > also tend to require corporate vendor support, which we do not provide.
> What is FIPS 140 and why is this important?
It
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:20:55PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> The reason is that the kind of entities which require FIPS 140 probably
> also tend to require corporate vendor support, which we do not provide.
What is FIPS 140 and why is this important?
> If building a package with NSS instead of
61 matches
Mail list logo
