On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:31:22PM -0400, James Vega wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:28:07PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > In this sense, most reasonable solution seems to me > > > > 0.YYMMDD > > > > This way, when ever upstream decide to release package with sane > > versioning (usually bigger than 1.) within 8 chars and we can continue > > without epoch. But this is not documented anywhere. > > Why assume the first version will be >= 1.x? It's not uncommon to use > 0.x. Using 0~YYMMDD seems a safer option to reduce the chance of > needing an epoch if/when upstream starts using actual version numbers.
Well... I was dreaming and asking the same question last night :-) For next 88 years, we can do this :-) Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110427142631.ga15...@debian.org
