Hi,
i am the author of cdrskin and not subscribed here.
Please Cc me.
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> All they are SCSI and not a singel one is working with wodim.
Hm. What are the symptoms ?
William Pitcock wrote:
> > Or look into libburn + cdrskin, which should "just work"
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Bill Unruh writes:
> The license issue is problematic, especially since copyright laws differ
> in different countries. Derivative works is an especially tricky concept
> since it is so poorly defined in law, and the courts have been all over
> the place on it. It would be really really nice if D
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Memnon Anon writes:
But! From a user-only perspective:
Do I think that the software Joerg Schilling provides is superior?
Yes.
I've tried it back when Debian still had a cdrecord and that, on
request by Joerg Schilling, did not include the dv
Am 2009-03-02 06:23:26, schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> Since everything seems to be dumping core on your system have you
> thought about the possibility that it might be your system that is at
> fault? Such a widespread range of coredumps usualy means one of the
> core libraries is corrupted on yo
Am 2009-03-01 23:01:09, schrieb William Pitcock:
> Or look into libburn + cdrskin, which should "just work".
Does not support the DVD's I need:
Description: command line CD/DVD writing tool
This is a cdrecord replacement that:
- Burns to all single layer DVD types
Michelle Konzack writes:
> I wish I had at least a STM-1 at home, I would you send you all 300
> coredumps since the release weekend of Lenny...
>
> I have over 16 GByte of coredumps: OpenOffice, Iceweasel, mutt, pidgin,
> FvwmForm, mimedecode, gimp, mc, ...
Since everything seems to be du
On Sunday 01 March 2009 23:31:21 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2009-02-26 12:46:25, schrieb Brett Parker:
> > As someone that uses wodim quite a bit, I've not noticed it to be "full
> > of bugs", so I'd suggest that you're spreading FUD and hoping that no
> > one notices.
>
> I have 35 TEAC CD-Burne
Memnon Anon writes:
> But! From a user-only perspective:
>
> Do I think that the software Joerg Schilling provides is superior?
> Yes.
I've tried it back when Debian still had a cdrecord and that, on
request by Joerg Schilling, did not include the dvd burning patch. One
had to rebuild the cdreco
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 23:35 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 01 mars 2009 à 22:31 +0100, Michelle Konzack a écrit :
> > I have 35 TEAC CD-Burner, 18 TraxData and a bunch of Yamaha.
> > All they are SCSI and not a singel one is working with wodim.
> >
> > The same goes for my 4 DVD burn
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I had installed wodim and before I send a bugreport, I try to figure
> out whats going on. And all I know was, that wodim told me after 20
> minutes the CD was ready... No error message or something like this.
So then you have:
1) wodim tries to burn
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sylvain Rochet
* Package name: mydns
Version : 1.2.8.26
Upstream Author : Howard Wilkinsin
* URL : http://mydns.pl/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C
Description : DNS server using MySQL or PostgreSQL for da
Steve McIntyre writes:
> Michelle wrote:
>>Josselin, HOW can someone try to support something, if SCSI support is
>>droped? The SCSI support require VERY MUCH working on it and I have NO
>>CLUE about SCSI programming.
>
> Michelle,
>
> You may have no clue about SCSI programming, but I'd hope
Am 2009-03-02 00:47:18, schrieb Miguel Gea Milvaques:
>> I am writing Free Software since 1982, this is much longer than Debian
>> exists.
>> I support Freedom and if Debian is against Freedom, I cannot support Debian.
Fsck! -- thats definitiveliy b...s..t!
> Jajajajajajajajajaja Now we have
Hello Steve,
Am 2009-03-02 00:23:47, schrieb Steve McIntyre:
> Michelle,
>
> You may have no clue about SCSI programming, but I'd hope you have
> some about how to report bugs. I don't see any wodim bugs from you
> describing your problem, which makes it a little difficult for us to
> do anything
I am writing Free Software since 1982, this is much longer than Debian exists.
I support Freedom and if Debian is against Freedom, I cannot support Debian.
Jajajajajajajajajaja Now we have a new Micro$oft-Debian xDD
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.or
Michelle wrote:
>Am 2009-03-01 23:35:17, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
>> Unfortunately, as such, we are not going to distribute either Nero
>> (which is non-free) nor cdrecord (which is undistributable). If you are
>> interested into improving CD burning support in Debian, youâre welcome
>> to eithe
Adeodato Simó (01/03/2009):
> Hello,
o<,
> We have a number of FTBFSes that are blockers for the current set of
> transitions going forward. I've gone ahead and tagged them with
> user:debian-rele...@lists.debian.org and usertag:transition-blocker.
thanks for the heads-up.
> The list is here:
Am 2009-03-01 23:35:17, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> Unfortunately, as such, we are not going to distribute either Nero
> (which is non-free) nor cdrecord (which is undistributable). If you are
> interested into improving CD burning support in Debian, you’re welcome
> to either help fixing these bug
Le dimanche 01 mars 2009 à 22:31 +0100, Michelle Konzack a écrit :
> I have 35 TEAC CD-Burner, 18 TraxData and a bunch of Yamaha.
> All they are SCSI and not a singel one is working with wodim.
>
> The same goes for my 4 DVD burners which are SCSI too.
>
> Since I have the CD-Burner in production
Le dimanche 01 mars 2009 à 22:34 +0100, Joerg Schilling a écrit :
> As long as people in this list are not interested in understanding the legal
> background, there is no difference whether the mail is made public or not.
>
> As Moglens recent and incorrect claims have already been made public, M
Hello,
We have a number of FTBFSes that are blockers for the current set of
transitions going forward. I've gone ahead and tagged them with
user:debian-rele...@lists.debian.org and usertag:transition-blocker.
The list is here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=tag&users=debian
Am 2009-02-27 19:34:04, schrieb Bill Allombert:
> Well there were some problems with popularity-contest, see bug #326593
> IIRC for sending to both f...@example.com and b...@example.com:
> ssmtp allows
> sendmail -oi f...@example.com,b...@example.com
> but not courrier-mta which want
> sendmail
Norbert Preining wrote:
> On So, 01 Mär 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > I have a private mail exchange with Eben Moglen where Moglen explains why
> > there is no problem with the specific GPL CDDL combination that is used in
> > mkisofs. These statements from Eben Moglen (made to me in private
Am 2009-02-26 12:46:25, schrieb Brett Parker:
> As someone that uses wodim quite a bit, I've not noticed it to be "full
> of bugs", so I'd suggest that you're spreading FUD and hoping that no
> one notices.
I have 35 TEAC CD-Burner, 18 TraxData and a bunch of Yamaha.
All they are SCSI and not a si
Hi,
On Sonntag, 1. März 2009, Carsten Hey wrote:
> And using stable and testing repositories together, e.g. during
> dist-upgrades, will be forbidden? If not, it can't be avoided.
So what? It's not supported and the user has to fix manually. No big deal.
regards,
Holger
signature.as
George Danchev wrote:
> On Sunday 01 March 2009 18:31:36 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-news-team/2009-February/000413.h
> > >tml
> >
> > I prefer to listen to credible statements.
> >
> > The only true claim in the quoted text is that Mark Shuttlewort
Hi,
On Sonntag, 1. März 2009, Carsten Hey wrote:
> In my opinion it is a way better practise to first update the policy and
> then adapt n packages instead of first change them in a way which is
> possibly against the policy and expect the policy to be updated
> accordingly.
There is nothing _aga
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 05:31:36PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > I have a private mail exchange with Eben Moglen where Moglen explains why
> > there is no problem with the specific GPL CDDL combination that is used
> > in mkisofs.
>
> Yes, I have a p
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:55:23PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello,
> [exim4 hat on]
> Neither me nor Marc could come up with obvious problems in the
> proposal. I doubt this is an importartant data point, though. I do
> not think I am exceptionally qualified to find any problems (if
> they
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 08:25:38PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
> ... if apt would try to solve a dependency on the virtual package
> default-mta provided by exim4 and exim5 it would ... choose to install
> exim4 in the described case ...
In case of a virtual default-mta package, the existence of
a t
On Sunday 01 March 2009 18:31:36 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-news-team/2009-February/000413.h
> >tml
>
> I prefer to listen to credible statements.
>
> The only true claim in the quoted text is that Mark Shuttleworth did stop
> his attempt to switch to c
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 05:31:36PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> I have a private mail exchange with Eben Moglen where Moglen explains why
> there is no problem with the specific GPL CDDL combination that is used in
> mkisofs.
Yes, I have a private mail exchange with Jesus that corroborates th
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:55:23PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> We could have a exim4 upload implementing in sid this rather quickly
> after receiving a go.
In general I much prefer a virtual package over a real one but I think
we should wait a bit until the following issues are clarified:
On
also sprach Dustin Kirkland [2009.03.01.1951 +0100]:
> Most of the Ubuntu diff is present due to our use of udev for device bringup.
> Is there roadmap for udev in Debian?
I think we are trying to minimise the diff with upstream, but you
probably want to know about the mdadm+udev roadmap.
I'd li
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:26 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am a bit swamped and won't be able to see to the many things that
> need to be done with mdadm for squeeze:
>
> - synchronise the big Ubuntu patch; Dustin Kirkland from Canonical
> has expressed interest to cooperate and could help.
Hi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luigi Gangitano
* Package name: lusca
Version : 1.0-r13795
Upstream Author : Adrian Chadd
* URL : http://www.lusca.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Lusca Web Proxy Cache
Lusca is a fork of
I've updated http://wiki.debian.org/binNMU to include a pointer to the
preferred format for binNMU requests, which supersedes the old one.
The appropriate syntax is explained at:
http://release.debian.org/wanna-build.txt
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at ne
On So, 01 Mär 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> I have a private mail exchange with Eben Moglen where Moglen explains why
> there is no problem with the specific GPL CDDL combination that is used in
> mkisofs. These statements from Eben Moglen (made to me in private) are not
[...]
> *) He even concu
Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) writes:
> > Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> Change your license, and maybe we???ll be able to think of collaborating.
> >
> > You seem to be unable for collaboration as you try to blackmail me.
>
> Stating a fact is not bl
On 2009-02-27 Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 03:42:39PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
[...]
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/05/msg00381.html with the best
>> choice appearantly being <87ve1faria@frosties.localdomain> which
>> proposes that exim4 should provide de
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 01:01:49PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 02:42 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > Deborphan needs a way to detect shared libraries ...
> [...]
>
> There is already a role::plugin which should apply to PAM modules.
role::plugin seems to fit. How do we ensur
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 02:42 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
> Deborphan needs a way to detect shared libraries like the ones currently
> in section libs and distinguish them from packages which are technically
> shared libraries but can not assumed to be orphaned when no other
> package depends on them.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Michal Čihař"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: mpdris
Version : none yet
Upstream Author : p...@ayeon.org
* URL : http://ayeon.org/projects/mpDris/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 10:14:34AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Carsten Hey [090228 19:21]:
> > > It shouldn't be anything harder than adding 'deprecated'
> > > (non-library, deprecated software) to complement oldlibs,
> >
> > Adding non-library packages to oldlibs would cause these to be
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 508585 wishlist
Bug#508585: Please provide an easy and official way to get debug symbols for
all arch
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
> severity 417118 wishlist
Bug#417118: ntpdate: Start sequence problem for some network setup
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 508585 +wishlist
Unknown tag/s: wishlist.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstrea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers
* Package name: xfce4-linelight-plugin
Version : 0.1.6
Upstream Author : Michael Pfeuti
* URL :
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/panel-plugins/xfce4-linelight-plugin
* License : GPL-2+
Program
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> You can perfecly add a =binary:Version dependency in debian/control
> directly, the relaxed dependency will be auto-removed by the
> dpkg-gencontrol because it is implied by the former one.
>
> Where's the problem ?
The problem is having to list a l
* Carsten Hey [090228 19:21]:
> > It shouldn't be anything harder than adding 'deprecated'
> > (non-library, deprecated software) to complement oldlibs,
>
> Adding non-library packages to oldlibs would cause these to be handled
> like a library by deborphan and thus possibly being falsely displaye
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I had a case recently where this wasn't too convenient with the ffmpeg
> package: it depends on a bunch of libs split in their own packages in
> the same source. The goal was to have a =binary:Version dep for ffmpeg
> on these libs, and use a relaxed v
50 matches
Mail list logo
