also sprach Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkl...@gmail.com> [2009.03.01.1951 +0100]: > Most of the Ubuntu diff is present due to our use of udev for device bringup. > Is there roadmap for udev in Debian?
I think we are trying to minimise the diff with upstream, but you probably want to know about the mdadm+udev roadmap. I'd like to work with upstream to improve the whole situation about md devices. Right now, we have to create a device to be able to issue ioctl()s to configure the array. I'd prefer instead if mdadm could write to /sys (or through another means), bring up devices, which then appear to udev just like any other block device. http://markmail.org/message/hqcrtbqa5nlk42vo Until that's in place, I am happy to consider Ubuntu's approach, if it is stable enough. I think we have standardised/enforced udev by now so that we could go down that road. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by incompetence." -- mark twain
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)