Le Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:09:42PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt a écrit :
> Unfortunately none of the top-level freedesktop categories fits either.
We have the same problem with the scientific applications :(
> > If there are enough, there is a third way of having an optional menu:
> > the Custom Deb
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:43:35AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 07:34:21PM +, Peter Clifton a écrit :
> >
> > In gEDA, the .desktop files list "Electronics" and "Engineering" (both
> > of which are sub-categories), and without an additional XML file
> > describing a n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: ttf-togoshi-gothic
Version: 20071218-1
Upstream Author: mshio
URL: http://togoshi-font.sourceforge.jp/
License: Wada Laboratory (BSD-like licence. It is same as sazanami
Le Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 07:34:21PM +, Peter Clifton a écrit :
>
> In gEDA, the .desktop files list "Electronics" and "Engineering" (both
> of which are sub-categories), and without an additional XML file
> describing a new menu, these applications will appear under "Others"
> under gnome, or l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: falcon
Version : 0.8.6
Upstream Author : Giancarlo niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.falconpl.org
* License
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:25:04 +0800 Emfox Zhou wrote:
> Description : fingerprint library of fprint project
Just some comments from me:
1. fprint needs imagemagick 6.3.*, which is not yet in Debian
2. you probably want to have a look at Debian FingerForce
http://wiki.debian.org/FingerForce a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: falcon
Version : 0.8.6
Upstream Author : Giancarlo niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.falconpl.org
* License
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> It seems to me that, in principle, if some third package or user environment
> wants something to be done for its own functional benefit, it should be its
> own
> responsibility to arrange that, instead of bothering thousands of other
> packages with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Register
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHim9Y5nwsoBIDC4YRAgKOAJ0csDSPndMNF2QwgXckfjyelQW7vACfbSiO
VPle65WuwWS2XPCiKrHUcvY=
=3jJY
-END PGP SIGNAT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Sanchez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gnomecatalog
Version : 0.3.3
Upstream Author : Jose Sanchez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sf.net/projects/gnomecatalog
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
"Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:28:27AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:18:24PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I don't think it makes sense to include in common-licenses someth
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>>> * License : non-free / CC By-SA 3.0
>>
>> Is it non-free because of its being CC-BY-SA 3.0, or does it contain
>> non-free stuff?
>>
> AFAIK, CC-BY-SA is non-free.
> 'non-free / CC BY-SA 3.0 '=3D> 'non-free (CC BY-SA 3.0)'
CC by-sa 3.0 is considered free and
On 2008-01-12, Simon McVittie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some more explanation: I intend to have a source package
> unreal-assistant, building binary packages unreal-assistant
> and unrealtournament. The former will be a packaging helper like java-package
> and module-assistant; the latter will b
On dim, 2008-01-13 at 14:23 +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-01-13, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Building caches at the user level for system stuff doesn=E2=80=99t sound li=
> > ke a
> > good design. Fontconfig stepped back from it some time ago, and I hope
> > KDE will do th
On 2008-01-13, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Building caches at the user level for system stuff doesn=E2=80=99t sound li=
> ke a
> good design. Fontconfig stepped back from it some time ago, and I hope
> KDE will do the same.
How to cache contents of peoples ~/.kde at system level?
On 13/01/2008, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> AFAIK, CC-BY-SA is non-free.
AFAICT, there are CC-BY-SA-3.0-licensed packages in main. I seem to
recall people on -legal disagree (but got to check the archives).
> 'non-free / CC BY-SA 3.0 '=> 'non-free (CC BY-SA 3.0)'
Thanks for clarifying.
Cheers,
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 13/01/2008, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> * License : non-free / CC By-SA 3.0
>
> Is it non-free because of its being CC-BY-SA 3.0, or does it contain
> non-free stuff?
>
AFAIK, CC-BY-SA is non-free.
'non-free / CC BY-SA 3.0 '=> 'non-free (CC BY-SA 3.0)'
> Cheers
On 13/01/2008, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> * License : non-free / CC By-SA 3.0
Is it non-free because of its being CC-BY-SA 3.0, or does it contain
non-free stuff?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpDCvTdieZpV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On dim, 2008-01-13 at 13:49 +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Please get out of your extreme gnomecentered world.
> KDE isn't using the icon caches.
I wonder why the KDE developers are participating in freedesktop if they
don’t use the specifications they helped writing.
> KDE4 is using its own pr use
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 17:30 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> I think I found the problem. I pre-processed two files in question,
> TDF_Attribute.cxx in OpenCASCADE and testDS.cxx in Salomé. I put both
> outputs in http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/salome/
>
> In the former, /usr/include/stlport/stl/_
On 2008-01-13, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are completely wrong on this topic. If you don=E2=80=99t use dh_icons, =
> the
> icons shipped in your package won=E2=80=99t be available even to the applic=
> ation
> itself. This is caused by a broken design for icon caches; because
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: industrial-icon-theme
Version : 11.0.3
Upstream Author : Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://forgeftp.novell.com/opensuse-art/openSUSE11/icons/
* License
On dim, 2008-01-13 at 13:12 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > You are completely wrong on this topic. If you don’t use dh_icons, the
> > icons shipped in your package won’t be available even to the application
> > itself.
>
> I don't claim to know the technical details o
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> You are completely wrong on this topic. If you don’t use dh_icons, the
> icons shipped in your package won’t be available even to the application
> itself.
I don't claim to know the technical details of this, but I don't have
update-icon-caches installed and I have never
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 19:34 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Joerg is advocating creating a package "xdg-extra-menus" to gather any
> possible extra menus which could be installed by the user.
I've spent a fair amount of time hacking on this, and have a result.. a
package I'm calling "extra-menus" f
Dear debian-devel:
It is our pleasure to keep you updated with the Job opportunities news in the
Middle East
Arabian Centers and ALLARABIA as the largest recruitment group in the Middle
East with branch office in many cities in the region, is pleased to inform you
that we have more than 7000
On dim, 2008-01-13 at 12:15 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Debian has always been about integration. Don’t you register your
> > documentation with doc-base so that your application integrates with
> > centralized documentation systems?
>
> I'm glad you bring up this
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Debian has always been about integration. Don’t you register your
> documentation with doc-base so that your application integrates with
> centralized documentation systems?
I'm glad you bring up this comparison, but this is different. If someone
neglects to do doc-base
On dim, 2008-01-13 at 10:21 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> For a while now some folks have been going around asking various package
> maintainers to inject dh_icons and/or dh_desktop calls into the package build
> rules. The basic argument appears to be that your package needs to do this so
> th
Package: general
Severity: normal
For a while now some folks have been going around asking various package
maintainers to inject dh_icons and/or dh_desktop calls into the package build
rules. The basic argument appears to be that your package needs to do this so
that my desktop environment will w
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:28:27AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:18:24PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> I don't think it makes sense to include in common-licenses something
> >> that's just a reference to other common
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.general Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all again,
> I just wrote, another, script which downloads the i386 and amd64 'versions'
> of the packages listed by the script which checks for empty Build-/Depends
> and compares the md5sums (from control.tar
32 matches
Mail list logo
