> Well, I guess, the only resolution for such case is to ask sash
> maintainer to include proper announcement for debconf and to include a
No, please.
Do not use debconf to diplay notices to users, especially about a
given package's behaviour. This is not debconf purpose.
Such note, if it is rel
> The reason why sash does this is different than the reason why people
> usually talk about it on the web, but while the sash use makes a
> moderate amount of sense at first glance, I'm not sure how often it's
> really useful compared to booting single-user or just changing the
> shell of the root
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:45:53 +0100, Steffen Moeller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Our society should be aware that people age. And it should find a
> way to live with the elderly, not expell them. This is why I
> strongly object the technically well-meant following paragraph:
If this is i
Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually it seems to be not mine, and not sash fault -- it seems to be a
> common practice mentioned in multiple howto's around the web such like
> http://linuxgazette.net/issue48/tag/16.html
It's a really *bad* common practice. Use of the root ac
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 11-Feb-07, 13:40 (CST), Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yup. You get very used to writing in the restricted common subset when
>> you have software that has to work on Solaris /bin/sh, but remembering
>> what's allowed and what isn't is
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:58:06PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > > No, it's a configuration error on your part. How is NSS supposed to know
> > > which is the "right" name for uid 0 when you've overloaded the uid with
> > > more
> > > than
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > No, it's a configuration error on your part. How is NSS supposed to know
> > which is the "right" name for uid 0 when you've overloaded the uid with more
> > than one username? If you don't ensure a unique mapping, NSS is free to
> > pick whiche
> "Alan" == Alan Ezust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alan> Question #1: For creating packages, as per the suggestions in
Alan>
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/Debian-Binary-Package-Building-HOWTO/#AEN88
Alan> There is this step that requires you to copy the control
Alan> file
Question #1: For creating packages, as per the suggestions in
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/Debian-Binary-Package-Building-HOWTO/#AEN88
There is this step that requires you to copy the control file from the
debian subdir to debian/DEBIAN directory. Could someone explain to me why is
this ste
> No, it's a configuration error on your part. How is NSS supposed to know
> which is the "right" name for uid 0 when you've overloaded the uid with more
> than one username? If you don't ensure a unique mapping, NSS is free to
> pick whichever mapping suits it at the time.
I thought that in ord
Le Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 04:59:05PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:59:20PM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > * Package name: pfstools
>
> FWIW, there are preliminary packages for pfstools and most associated tools
> at
>
> http://storage.sesse.net/pfs-sourc
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:24:07AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:10:36PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:05:26AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
>
> The check, though, only compares the names of the source packages to the
> the names of the binary packages,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:45:17PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Does anyone know the contact e-mail address for the RC bugs web page
> (http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/)? The address [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> listed in that page, does not work. I get:
Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a first ap
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 04:22:15PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I have a box (etch amd64) which had sash installed with created
> sashroot account to run sash for the case of emergency. /etc/passwd had
> it
> ,-
> | root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
> | sash
On Monday 12 February 2007 16:31, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> While I think it's a good idea to consider whether people voted or did
> not vote for the DPL election a data point for MIA-ness, I feel that
> the lack of producing a vote should not be taken as inactivity.
I agree. And the converse is al
Dear All,
Since there is a small chance that there is an issue with libnss part of
libc6 I've decided to talk to -dev first (instead of filing libc6
bugreport or sending it to -users). libc6 I have now is 2.3.6.ds1-8, I
know that I am 2 revisions behind etch version -need to figure out why
debmir
[Please respond back to -vote where this belongs, not here.]
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Joe Buck wrote:
> Right now, those who run auto-builders are trusted, but the GR
> proposes to trust all developers. Right?
It doesn't really change anything because nothing stops you as a
developer from uploading b
Seg, 2007-02-12 às 20:35 +0100, Adrian von Bidder escreveu:
> On Monday 05 February 2007 17.23:28 Maarten Verwijs wrote:
> > I took the plunge and upgraded about half of the Lab here to Etch.
> > This is about 27 machines to date, catering almost the same amount of
> > users.
>
> Hi,
>
> Manually
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:10:36PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:05:26AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 12:15:13PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > > This is a notification of a general resolution proposed on the
> > > debian-vote m
On Monday 05 February 2007 17.23:28 Maarten Verwijs wrote:
> I took the plunge and upgraded about half of the Lab here to Etch.
> This is about 27 machines to date, catering almost the same amount of
> users.
Hi,
Manually? I'd just like to point out that for 27 machines, setting up a fai
server
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:05:26AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 12:15:13PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > This is a notification of a general resolution proposed on the
> > debian-vote mailing list. On the 8th of February, in a message with
> > Message-ID
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xmoto-edit
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Rasmus Neckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Nicolas Adenis-Lamarre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://xmoto.tuxfamily.or
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 12:15:13PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> This is a notification of a general resolution proposed on the
> debian-vote mailing list. On the 8th of February, in a message with
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> propos
hi
I want debian etch sorce code and desktop picture.
I have advertisment purppose.
if it's possible for you please sent to my mail.
thank
-
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
Am Montag 12 Februar 2007 13:39 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> Description : vCard (the Electronic Business Card) library
>
> vCard is an Electronic Business Card format, as specified by the versit
> Consortium, useful for storing personal data. libvc handles scanning a
> vCard file, parsing
On 11-Feb-07, 13:40 (CST), Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Then you have a lot more problems than `` vs $(). Debian's (and pretty
> > much everybody elses) /bin/sh is POSIX, and allows any valid POSIX
> > construct. Solaris's /bin/sh is anc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libauthen-simple-ldap-perl
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Christian Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~chansen/Authen-Simple-LDAP-0.2/
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libauthen-simple-net-perl
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Christian Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~chansen/Authen-Simple-NET-0.2/
* License : GP
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:59:20PM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> * Package name: pfstools
FWIW, there are preliminary packages for pfstools and most associated tools
at
http://storage.sesse.net/pfs-sources.tar.gz
There are some bugs in them, but if you haven't packaged them by yourself
al
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:04:24AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> > a DD not interested in Debian "politics" has no need to be a DD. If
>> > it's just a matter of technical work then sponsorship would be
>> > enough.
>> Do I understand you right, that, according to you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pfstools
Upstream Author : Grzegorz Krawczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rafal Mantiuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/resources/pfstools/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libauthen-simple-dbm-perl
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Christian Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~chansen/Authen-Simple-DBM-0.2/
* License : GP
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libauthen-simple-dbi-perl
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Christian Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~chansen/Authen-Simple-DBI-0.2/
* License : GP
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 10:59:53PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On dim, 2007-02-11 at 15:35 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > an active DD should
> > > not be afraid of passing something we ask of every new developer?
> >
> > On
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libauthen-simple-cdbi-perl
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Christian Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/C/CH/CHANSEN/Authen-Simple-CDBI-0.2.
Does anyone know the contact e-mail address for the RC bugs web page
(http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/)? The address [EMAIL PROTECTED],
listed in that page, does not work. I get:
===
This message was created automati
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I don't know how do you relate with my analysis. Do you
> usually vote for the DPL elections or GRs? If not then yes, I feel you
> don't need a key (but see below). Of course this do not imply you should
> ask for the removal: there's a deficiency in our b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mutt-vc-query
Version : 002
Upstream Author : Andrew Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rolo.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libvc
Version : 003
Upstream Author : Andrew Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : vCard
On Monday 12 February 2007 13:35:21 you wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> > While at the moment that I have just passed Tasks&Skills II, I consider
> > this to be possible but rather unlikely szenario. However, I presume that
> > in about 20-30 years from now when I got older t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: rolo
Version : 011
Upstream Author : Andrew Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rolo.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : tex
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> While at the moment that I have just passed Tasks&Skills II, I consider this
> to be possible but rather unlikely szenario. However, I presume that in about
> 20-30 years from now when I got older this may well be true. What do we have
> then - quant
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:04:24AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > a DD not interested in Debian "politics" has no need to be a DD. If
> > it's just a matter of technical work then sponsorship would be
> > enough.
> Do I understand you right, that, according to your opinion, people like
> me shoul
Hi mate
> > As far as I can see right now there are plenty of people listed
> > there with no packages and they can be the targets for the first
> > run.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/qa.debian.org/mia$ ./mia-todo needs-wat
> 0 maintainers in possible need of needs-wat
Try it again please, the mia db
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> a DD not interested in
> Debian "politics" has no need to be a DD. If it's just a matter of
> technical work then sponsorship would be enough.
Do I understand you right, that, according to your opinion, people like
me should ask the DAM to remove their key?
I'm not say
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 04:04:30PM -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> Also, when forced to use the LILO boot loader because of a RAID
> +LVM /boot, LILO takes *forever* to actually load the initramfs from the
> physical media. Parade of dots followed by "BIOS data check successful"
> occurs while wa
On Monday 12 February 2007 01:58:19 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > A probable reason is that the NM process is getting tougher and/or that
> > some developpers didn't even pass an NM process...
While at the moment that I have just passed Tasks&Skil
Ok, thanks to all,
I know that UDP is a protocol and what I was looking for is for the code of
that funtions like "recvfrom", "sendto",... and well I thing that with the
source of the glibc and with the linux-source I could find something
although I think that it's not going to be easy to foll
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 10:59:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 11 février 2007 à 12:50 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > Well, the translations really should not be part of the ABI of the library;
> > libraries shouldn't be engaging in direct interaction with the user, so the
> >
49 matches
Mail list logo
