On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:32:09PM -0700, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Tue October 31 2006 21:15, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > Bruce Sass wrote:
> > > I have yet to see a spam message sent to the BTS which used a
> > > "Package:" pseudoheader, so that should work to eliminate BTS spam
> > > without prev
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:02:22AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> While I fully agree with you on all points, I think that this should be
> discussed post-etch with the general question of "in which environment
> are packages supposed to build ?". There are other similar issue, like:
> - should pac
(Cced the relevant bug report)
On 31/10/06 at 23:50 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Some packages (e.g choose-mirror) fetch a newer version of a file during
> > build if it's possible to fetch that file. I don't think this is RC,
> > since the file is not missing fr
On Tue October 31 2006 23:02, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > On Tue October 31 2006 21:15, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > > Bruce Sass wrote:
> > > > I have yet to see a spam message sent to the BTS which used a
> > > > "Package:" pseudoheader, so that should work
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Tue October 31 2006 21:15, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > Bruce Sass wrote:
> > > I have yet to see a spam message sent to the BTS which used a
> > > "Package:" pseudoheader, so that should work to eliminate BTS spam
> > > without preventing non-DD's helpi
On Tue October 31 2006 21:15, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Bruce Sass wrote:
> > I have yet to see a spam message sent to the BTS which used a
> > "Package:" pseudoheader, so that should work to eliminate BTS spam
> > without preventing non-DD's helping out.
>
> OTOH, a /lot/ of legitimate mail is s
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Some packages (e.g choose-mirror) fetch a newer version of a file during
> build if it's possible to fetch that file. I don't think this is RC,
> since the file is not missing from the package if the network is not
> available.
>
In general, I strongly suspect that fetc
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> How come it never outputs p4_clockmod? I use that happily on several
> different machines.
>
I can confirm I've tried it on a machine. The performance impact was
substantial (at least if I allowed it to go to its lowest speed); the
power consumption difference was imme
Bruce Sass wrote:
> I have yet to see a spam message sent to the BTS which used a "Package:"
> pseudoheader, so that should work to eliminate BTS spam without
> preventing non-DD's helping out.
>
OTOH, a /lot/ of legitimate mail is sent to the BTS w/o a Package:
pseudo-header (think: pretty mu
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:57:51PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Interactive tests or tests requiring network access should not have to
> > pass in order to build a package.
> What about tests that only require localhost be available? I'd been
> puzz
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:55:16AM -0600, Jacques Normand wrote:
> During the passage from xfree to xorg, libxft1 has been dropped in favor
> of libXft2. I have no problem with that except that libXft1 is not
> installable anymore (etch system). It depend on the old xfree packages.
> It is a pr
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:55:16AM -0600, Jacques Normand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the passage from xfree to xorg, libxft1 has been dropped in favor
> of libXft2. I have no problem with that except that libXft1 is not
> installable anymore (etch system). It depend on the old xfree packages.
>
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bouthenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kwin-style-knifty
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Author : Sandro Giessl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=8841
* License : GPL
P
Alex Pennace wrote:
> > piper:/etc> sudo find /etc -path /etc/alternatives -prune -o -type l
> > -exec readlink -f {} \; | egrep -v '^/etc' | wc -l
>
> I'm surprised your report missed one of the most established
> configuration symlinks of them all: /etc/localtime.
I was more suprised that i
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:22:27PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Alex Pennace wrote:
> > I'm surprised your report missed one of the most established
> > configuration symlinks of them all: /etc/localtime. I'm pointing that
> > out in particular because it has bee
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 21:03, Stephen Frost wrote:
> If they expire then they should be updated by the package. One does
> not generally modify issued certificates. If the package isn't
> handling certificate expiration then the point of having them packaged
> at all pretty much goes away. I
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Alex Pennace wrote:
> I'm surprised your report missed one of the most established
> configuration symlinks of them all: /etc/localtime. I'm pointing that
> out in particular because it has been around for as long as I can
> remember, and serves its configuration function by po
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:10:45PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> The recent ca-certificates upgrade overwrote this "configuration"
> simply because my /bin/cat call actually changed a file in
> /usr/share, where changes by the admin are not preserved. Yet, due
> to the links in /etc/ssl/certs, th
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> also sprach Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.31.2016 +0100]:
> > In all of these cases the files pointed to are not intended to be
> > modified but what file is used can be configured.
>
> How are certificate files not intended to be modifie
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:32:49PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.31.2016 +0100]:
> > In all of these cases the files pointed to are not intended to be
> > modified but what file is used can be configured.
>
> How are certificate files not in
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:51:20PM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> Isn't there a risk of causing double work?
>
> Person A reports spam, Blars removes it
> Person B reports the same spam, Blars checks again - no spam found
My script to clean bugs checks to see if the bug has been cleaned
since th
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:32:49PM +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> also sprach Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.31.2016 +0100]:
> > In all of these cases the files pointed to are not intended to be
> > modified but what file is used can be configured.
>
> How are cer
also sprach Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.31.2016 +0100]:
> In all of these cases the files pointed to are not intended to be
> modified but what file is used can be configured.
How are certificate files not intended to be modified? If they
expire? If they are incomplete?
--
Please
On Oct 31, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I consider this a bug, and even release-critical, and would say that
> ca-certificates should use ucf to maintain the certificates in
I don't. I think that symlinks to files somewhere are a good way to
solve this specific problem.
> /etc/ssl
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:54:02PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > cat /the/best/dictionary >> /etc/dictionaries-common/words
>
> I don't see the reason why /etc/dictionaries-common/words should be
> a symlink either. The right way to solve this would be to use
> alternatives and provide a se
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> also sprach Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.31.1948 +0100]:
> > cat /my/favorite/editor >> /etc/alternatives/vi
>
> alternatives are surely an exception, don't you think?
>
> > cat /the/best/dictionary >> /etc/dictionaries-common/words
>
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:41:02PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am fully aware of this. However, it's misleading, don't you think?
I cannot answer that from the average user perspective. However,
symlinks are quite handy and there is already an established base of
users who are familiar with
also sprach Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.31.1948 +0100]:
> cat /my/favorite/editor >> /etc/alternatives/vi
alternatives are surely an exception, don't you think?
> cat /the/best/dictionary >> /etc/dictionaries-common/words
I don't see the reason why /etc/dictionaries-common/words s
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Since #350282 is still being discussed, I ended up doing
>
> cat /etc/ssl/certs/cacert-class3.pem >> /etc/ssl/certs/cacert.pem
>
> on systems that needed access to all of CACert's certificates.
cat /my/favorite/editor >> /etc/alternatives/vi
cat /
also sprach Alex Pennace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.31.1917 +0100]:
> The configuration being preserved is a set of symlinks, not the
> contents of their targets.
I am fully aware of this. However, it's misleading, don't you think?
It's just not very typical for symlinks in /etc to be considered
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:10:45PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Since #350282 is still being discussed, I ended up doing
>
> cat /etc/ssl/certs/cacert-class3.pem >> /etc/ssl/certs/cacert.pem
>
> on systems that needed access to all of CACert's certificates.
>
> The recent ca-certificates up
ca-certificates installs about 100 certificates into
/etc/ssl/certs. However, these are not actually dropped into the
directory; instead, symlinks into /usr/share are put in place:
piper:/etc/ssl/certs# ls -la /etc/ssl/certs/cacert.org.pem
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 52 2006-10-31 18:56 /etc/ssl/certs/
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:55:16AM -0600, Jacques Normand wrote:
> During the passage from xfree to xorg, libxft1 has been dropped in favor
> of libXft2. I have no problem with that except that libXft1 is not
> installable anymore (etch system). It depend on the old xfree packages.
>
> It is a p
Hi,
During the passage from xfree to xorg, libxft1 has been dropped in favor
of libXft2. I have no problem with that except that libXft1 is not
installable anymore (etch system). It depend on the old xfree packages.
It is a problem since I have a few executables which link to this
library at ru
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Interactive tests or tests requiring network access should not have to
>> pass in order to build a package.
>
> What about tests that only require localhost be available? I'd been
> puzzling over that for a
Found your resume on the Internet last night. I don't know if you are looking,
but I was wondering if you might know of someone who is looking. I'm searching
for candidates for openings that I have in Ohio and throughout the country.
Hopefully there is someone that you can refer to me. I'm an in
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:24:06PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:46:46AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> > BTW, could it be possible to provide an alternate interface to submit spam?
> > (like the 'report-listspam AT lists.debian.org' we can bounce spam
On Die, 31 Okt 2006, Stephen Gran wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.org/AliothFAQ
> "Something deletes my ~/.ssh/authorized_keys file"
Ahh, thanks. Interestingly I did see the following on
http://wiki.debian.org/AliothSVN
| The SSH keys are not synchronized between alioth.debian.org and
| svn.debian.o
Faidon Liambotis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:30:47PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Bear in mind that the 64-bit kernel doesn't offer all the functionality
that the 32-bit one does. vm86
Joachim Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hallo,
>
> ich muss an der Uni ein Programm schreiben das alle Prozesse auflistet
> welche ihr root-Verzeichnis (chroot) geändert haben.
>
> Meine Idee war ich nehme die Sourcen des ps-Kommandos und passe diese
> meinen Erfordernissen an.
> Geht aber nur
Hi, Hamish
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I wrote a trivial perl script to which I pipe in BTS spams from mutt;
> it extracts the bug number from the Subject then runs the bts program.
URL? ;)
--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' :
This one time, at band camp, Norbert Preining said:
> Hi all!
>
> Can someone explain me why the file
> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys
> is disappearing again and again on alioth.debian.org? Every day I have
> to call ssh-copy-id or copy the key by hand ...
http://wiki.debian.org/AliothFAQ
"Someth
Hi all!
Can someone explain me why the file
~/.ssh/authorized_keys
is disappearing again and again on alioth.debian.org? Every day I have
to call ssh-copy-id or copy the key by hand ...
Best wishes
Norbert
---
D
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:46:46AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> BTW, could it be possible to provide an alternate interface to submit spam?
> (like the 'report-listspam AT lists.debian.org' we can bounce spam from the
> mailing lists to)
Using the devscripts package you can "bts
Seg, 2006-10-30 às 14:43 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG escreveu:
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 12:53 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Keeping such tests in package builds is fine, but they should either be
> > disabled by default (enabled with an environment variable, say), or they
> > should be information
Peter Palfrader:
> How come it never outputs p4_clockmod? I use that happily on several
> different machines.
It's disabled in Ubuntu with the following comment:
# Disabled for now - the latency tends to be bad enough to make it
# fairly pointless.
# echo "FREQDRIVER=p4-clockmod" >/etc/default/p
retitle 392823 ITP: prayer -- fast IMAP-based web mail system with few
dependencies
owner 392823 Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks
I've sent some questions and comments upstream. Most notably,
* Prayer assumes that folders can't contain other folders, even if
the IMAP server suppor
47 matches
Mail list logo
