On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Bruce Sass wrote: > On Tue October 31 2006 21:15, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > Bruce Sass wrote: > > > I have yet to see a spam message sent to the BTS which used a > > > "Package:" pseudoheader, so that should work to eliminate BTS spam > > > without preventing non-DD's helping out. > > > > OTOH, a /lot/ of legitimate mail is sent to the BTS w/o a Package: > > pseudo-header (think: pretty much anything to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]). So this isn't really a solution. > > I don't think that disqualifies it as a solution, it just means there > would be a transition period while users learn that it is a required > part of messages sent to the BTS.
It has all of the same types of problems as sender verification anti-spam techniques; increasing the number of hoops that users have to hop through decreases the likelihood of them actually reporting spam. Decreasing the score at which we ignore messages is trivial, but it means increasing the number of false positives. [And because backscatter is bad, these will be messages which just "disappear", unless some (massochistic) person actually goes through the spam mailboxes.] Don Armstrong -- Build a fire for a man, an he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. -- Jules Bean http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
