The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 299 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 80 (new: 2)
Total number of packages requeste
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 03:05:17PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:09:11PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> > The package has bugs, lots of them, and for that reason has been removed
> > from testing, well done, unstable it is here for that.
>
> Uh no. I find it scary that
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just because something is also political statement doesn't make it
> evil or wrong.
Yup.
I think it's rather rude to respond to an ITP by publicly questioning
the choice of license (as long as it's a valid license for Debian).
-Miles
--
I'm beginning
On Thu, 11 May 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.2219 +0200]:
> > I think this is the whole point of licensing a library under the GPL.
>
> For me the point of a library is code reuse. Putting a library under
> the GPL is more of a politica
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:36:18AM +1000, Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> On Thursday 11 May 2006 01:25, Frank Küster wrote:
> > The only things that should be installed separately are
> > probably aptitude, apt and dpkg, then just dist-upgrade.
> From memory, upgrading apt + friends seperately isn't poss
> > Wow. First off, Kari does not appear to be upstream, so who are
> > you addressing?
>
> Him. I think he's in the better position to talk to upstream about
> it. Or in fact not make the package.
Oh, come on. It's the author's perogative as to how the work is
licensed, and since it adheres t
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:13:31AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
Jose,
Before I comment on a few things, I want to make something clear to you.
You have repeatedly accused me of having something personal against you,
both in public and in private.
I cannot recall ever having even *heard* of yo
"Daniel Ruoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Em Qui, 2006-05-11 às 09:56 +0200, Gabor Gombas escreveu:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Why would that not fly?
> Both versions of the arch-independent package could be installed a
"Adam Borowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:49:26PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
On the other hand, if we continue that thought process we could end up
with all headers and libraries in /usr/share/, which is absurd.
Why? This is exactly
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:22:18PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Usually, when I get problems with xpdf on a PDF, it is a PDF
> 1.5. Either it simply doesn't work, or very slowly, or text search
> doesn't work in the PDF.
Please submit bug reports. I couldn't find any such reports at
http://b
binvkxvxghUd7.bin
Description: lingle
John Goerzen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I intend to take over the Bacula package. I would first like to say
> thanks to Jose Luis Tallon for initially packaging it for Debian and
> maintaining it for these years.
>
You have a funny sense of time, don't you?
This is true; Years. Since October 2003.
> A
* Jos? Luis Tall?n ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> >> If the maintainer still wants to maintain it, help him, do NMUs, whatever,
> >> but I'm still looking for one reason you can take over the package against
> >> the maintainer's opinion.
> >
> > He wants to have his name on th
* Jos? Luis Tall?n ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Actually, we've heard in this thread that Stephen (his AM) *did* offer to
> > sponsor bacula uploads, and José Luis did not avail himself of this.
> When the offer did come, I wasn't able to prepare the upload anyway.
> I sus
Stephen Frost wrote:
>> If the maintainer still wants to maintain it, help him, do NMUs, whatever,
>> but I'm still looking for one reason you can take over the package against
>> the maintainer's opinion.
>>
>
> He wants to have his name on the package w/o doing the work
> (apparently).
What
On Thursday 11 May 2006 01:25, Frank Küster wrote:
> The only things that should be installed separately are
> probably aptitude, apt and dpkg, then just dist-upgrade.
>
From memory, upgrading apt + friends seperately isn't possible whilst synaptic is installed. In sarge, the gnome meta package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Santiago Ruano Rincón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: asterisk-prompt-es-co
Version : 0.0.20060503
Upstream Author : Avatar Ltda. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.avatar.com.co/
* License : GPL
Description
Steve Langasek wrote:
> It is the responsibility of a package maintainer to ensure that fixes for
> bugs are uploaded in a timely manner. If José Luis isn't able to do this,
> because he doesn't have a sponsor or for any other reason, then he is not an
> effective maintainer for the package.
>
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:49:26PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> On the other hand, if we continue that thought process we could end up
> with all headers and libraries in /usr/share/, which is absurd.
Why? This is exactly what's beautiful, especially if EVERYTHING ends up in
/usr/share/ at one day,
Hi,
I'd add localepurge - witch save my >25 % disk space on 6-700 mb
installation.
Thanks!
Eugen Paiuc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to, 2006-05-11 kello 07:13 -0700, Ben Pfaff kirjoitti:
> It's not clear to me, from the description, what the program does
> that the md5sum and sha1sum utilities do not.
It handles .dsc, .changes, and Sources files. But I also forgot to
mention the main reason I wrote it: it gives progress feedba
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:30:40PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:37:35AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> : > Jose Luis doesn't want just his name in some place, he has worked a lot
> : > in bacula in the past, and I don't know why he can't remain as
> : > maintainer or
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:32:36PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Julian Gilbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 22:17]:
> > Does anyone know why the binary package gnome is no longer in testing?
> > The source package meta-gnome2 is there
>
> Seems like an accident currently. We're researching th
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
Looking at the myriad ways of starting messages in /var/log/boot,
Starting X TrueType font server: xfstt.
Starting /usr/sbin/chronyd...
Starting anac(h)ronistic cron: anacron.
Starting deferred execution scheduler: atd.
Starting periodic command scheduler
(e
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:07:55PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
[ snip ]
> I have myself fixed in excess of 40 bugs in my packages in the last 48h,
> when I have been back to speed.
> So what???
I had already checked the packages you posted on sf.net and have not been able
to find bug fixes an
* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 20:21]:
> On Thu, 11 May 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Ganesan Rajagopal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 14:12]:
> > > > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > >> An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly asked
>
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060512 00:00]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 23:54]:
> >> Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
> >>
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 23:56]:
> So, what are the issues that need to be fixed? Currently #360851
> doesn't say it's blocked by anything, and two packages are blocked
> waiting for it.
As said, I put it on my "need to work on"-list, and you'll get results
in May (and ho
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 23:54]:
>> Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
>> > is going to ship with 2.3?
>>
>> Yeah, what about it?
>>
>> There
also sprach Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.2219 +0200]:
> I think this is the whole point of licensing a library under the GPL.
For me the point of a library is code reuse. Putting a library under
the GPL is more of a political statement.
> There's not much point in using a copy
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 10:48]:
>> Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 10:09 +0200, Domenico Andreoli a écrit :
>> > what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
>> > is going to ship with 2.3?
>>
>> An upload of pytho
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 23:54]:
> Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
> > is going to ship with 2.3?
>
> Yeah, what about it?
>
> There is an open bug, it's blocking lilypond which should
Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> hi,
>
>> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
>> whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
>
> what about the t
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roberto Lumbreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
>> Ok, the maintainer has not fixed the bugs, has not packaged the last
>> version of it in time, etc, but he has done a great job anyway, and I
>> still don't see the point of hijacking the
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 23:07 +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> > John has managed to not only update to the latest upstream version in his
> > upload, but he's also managed to fix 24 bugs by my count. It is notable
> > that he has managed to achieve so much while Jose struggled just to update
> > to
Em Qui, 2006-05-11 às 09:56 +0200, Gabor Gombas escreveu:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > Why would that not fly?
> > Both versions of the arch-independent package could be installed at
> > the same time.
> /usr/share/foo/bar can't point to two different fil
David Nusinow wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:30:40PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
>
>> He has packaged the last version of bacula, and it is not uploaded
>> because it's not ready, then a new version was showed up... he has a
>> personal apt repository that users from bacula mailing list
On 5/10/06, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Better to create 15.000 additional DEB's with pics and additonal
descriptoons (per screenshoot) and make Meta packages to instal with
apt-get install aptpics-all (for installing the
whole
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I have created a new page in the wiki to track info and status
> >
> > http://wiki.debian.org/multiarch
>
> I looked at the "upstream standards proposal":
> http://lackof.org/taggart/hacking/multiarch/
>
> It's good.
> I am particularly pleased by the specification:
>
"Matt Taggart and others" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi debian-devel,
For a couple years now a few of us have been talking about an idea called
"multiarch". This is a way to seamlessly allow support for multiple
different
binary targets on the same system, for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "OndÅej Surý" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libodbc++
Version : 0.2.4pre3
Upstream Author : Manush Dodunekov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://libodbcxx.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
D
* Julian Gilbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 22:17]:
> Does anyone know why the binary package gnome is no longer in testing?
> The source package meta-gnome2 is there
Seems like an accident currently. We're researching the matter.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
T
Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 16:46 +0200, martin f krafft a écrit :
> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
> > * License : GPL v2 or later
>
> That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications. Why don't
> you choose (if possible) a less "viral" licence?
Does anyone know why the binary package gnome is no longer in testing?
The source package meta-gnome2 is there
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:34:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:59:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL
> > > PRO
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:34:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:59:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:30:40PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> He has packaged the last version of bacula, and it is not uploaded
> because it's not ready, then a new version was showed up... he has a
> personal apt repository that users from bacula mailing list uses, and
> packages (not yet
On Thu, 11 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "The terms arch and os represent the Architecture and Operating System
> as defined and provided by config.guess."
Well, config.sub is the one whose function is to provide canonical
names, config.guess might not do so for one reason or another (but
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:37:35AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
: * Roberto Lumbreras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: > Speaking about your mail, I think it's your opinion, mine is different.
:
: Sure, but you're looking through some very rosy glasses.
hey, I've tried to be fair...
: > Jose Luis doe
* Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 15:05]:
> >Well, I've no idea what you mean by "manage". You can add new
> >blockers to the meta bug and remove them, which is all I want to
> >do.
> by mail, really ?
Yeah, "block xx by foo".
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UN
also sprach Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1702 +0200]:
> > That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications.
>
> Non-GPL compatible applications, you mean?
Yeah well. IMHO that pretty much excludes all sensible licences.
> > Why don't you choose (if possible) a less "vi
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Ganesan Rajagopal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 14:12]:
> > > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >> An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly asked
> > >> during the last months, and it was ignored by the mainta
>I have created a new page in the wiki to track info and status
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/multiarch
I looked at the "upstream standards proposal":
http://lackof.org/taggart/hacking/multiarch/
It's good.
I am particularly pleased by the specification:
"The terms arch and os represent the Archit
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:59:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
>
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:20:29PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 13:38]:
> > I know, tbm tried to build all packages on mips*. It would be intersting
> > to know, how other architectures behave. Also i have not seen any
> > comments from doko
On 5/11/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 14:39]:
> >> Why you did this metabug thing, and not just usertagged the bugs ? The
> >> results seems to be similar, but i don't think that a metabug can be
> >> managed by email, usertags ar
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # This bug is from 2000, and the submitter failed to give the requested
> # followup information. Furthermore devfs is dead meat.
> close 78282
Bug#78282: DevFS incompatabilities
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libwiki-toolkit-perl
Version : 0.70
Upstream Author : The Wiki::Toolkit team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.wiki-toolkit.org/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libwiki-toolkit-formatter-usemod-perl
Version : 0.19
Upstream Author : The Wiki::Toolkit project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.wiki-toolkit.org/
* License : D
* Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 14:39]:
> >> Why you did this metabug thing, and not just usertagged the bugs ? The
> >> results seems to be similar, but i don't think that a metabug can be
> >> managed by email, usertags are.
> >What can not be managed by email?
> The metabug itse
On 5/11/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 11:20]:
> Why you did this metabug thing, and not just usertagged the bugs ? The
> results seems to be similar, but i don't think that a metabug can be
> managed by email, usertags are.
What
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:21:37AM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> I am strongly against compressing PDFs
> To add insult to injury, PDF 1.5 introduces ``object streams'' which
> allow compressing arbitrarily long chunks of a PDF file without
> giving up the random-access properties of PDF. A
Sorry for the late answer...
> 3) How would synaptic (for instance) know which packages have which
> images? I suppose you would need a Packages-like file with this
> information... (This will not be incorporated in the main Packages
> file... not before this idea being proved as possible and usef
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTEC
Frank Küster wrote:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications.
[...]
> As a derived work of a GPL'd work, the aggregate is covered by the GPL
> license.
So the aggregate, in other words the *application* would be a
GPL-application, right? Which make
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>>> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
>>> > * License : GPL v2 or later
>>>
>>> That will make it pr
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
> * License
Frank Küster wrote:
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> >> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
> >> > * License : GPL v2 or later
> >>
> >> That will make it pretty useless for
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
>> > * License : GPL v2 or later
>>
>> That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications.
>
> Non-GP
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
> > * License : GPL v2 or later
>
> That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications.
Non-GPL compatible applications, you mean?
> Why don't y
also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
> * License : GPL v2 or later
That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications. Why don't
you choose (if possible) a less "viral" licence?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.'
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cxxtools
Version : 1.4.1pre2
Upstream Author : Tommi Mäkitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.tntnet.org/
* License : GPL v2 or later
Programming Lang: C++
Descri
* Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 11:20]:
> Why you did this metabug thing, and not just usertagged the bugs ? The
> results seems to be similar, but i don't think that a metabug can be
> managed by email, usertags are.
What can not be managed by email?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://w
On 5/11/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 10:00]:
> > One: What's the easiest way to extract the list of gcc-4.1 related bugs
> > from the BTS?
>
> There is none I know - I asked Martin already yesterday on IRC to
> provide such a way.
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A checksum is a number that identifies the contents of a file: if the
> contents change, so does the checksum. If you create a checksum before
> you burn a CD, when you know the files are correct, you can easily
> check the CD at any time: just comp
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 10:00]:
> > One: What's the easiest way to extract the list of gcc-4.1 related bugs
> > from the BTS?
>
> There is none I know - I asked Martin already yesterday on IRC to
> provide such a way.
I've created the following meta bug: 366820
--
Martin
Martin,
Is this auto-trace program available for public use?
Thanks,
Stan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 366820 by 366821
Bug#366820: Transition to GCC 4.1 for etch
Was blocked by: 275774 355163 355165 355189 355325 355326 355352 355396 355463
355598 355599 355663 355738 355739 355741 355744 355841 355980 355983 355986
355988 355989 355990 355992 3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 366820 by 355163
Bug#366820: Transition to GCC 4.1 for etch
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 355163
> block 366820 by 355352
Bug#366820: Transition to GCC 4.1 for etch
Was blocked by: 355163
Blocking bugs added: 355352
> block 3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 366820 by 357961
Bug#366820: Transition to GCC 4.1 for etch
Was blocked by: 355163 355352 355396 355598 355841 355983 355989 355997 356004
356093 356109 356110 356116 356160 356228 356232 356238 356246 356248 356303
356304 356366 356370 356436 3
* Roberto Lumbreras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Speaking about your mail, I think it's your opinion, mine is different.
Sure, but you're looking through some very rosy glasses.
> Jose Luis doesn't want just his name in some place, he has worked a lot
> in bacula in the past, and I don't know why
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 14:20]:
> > I know, tbm tried to build all packages on mips*. It would be intersting
> > to know, how other architectures behave. Also i have not seen any
> > comments from doko yet.
> I built mips and amd64, and in the mean time also powerpc and m
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:46:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
:
: Roberto,
:
: Your mailer is busted. You might want to fix it- it's setting an
: invalid Reply-To address. Below is the bounce (including my reply, if
: you don't see it on d-d).
My fault, I misplaced the msgid of the mail
* Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 13:38]:
> I know, tbm tried to build all packages on mips*. It would be intersting
> to know, how other architectures behave. Also i have not seen any
> comments from doko yet.
I built mips and amd64, and in the mean time also powerpc and most o
* Ganesan Rajagopal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 14:12]:
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly asked
> >> during the last months, and it was ignored by the maintainer. I'm not
> >> aware of anything preventing this
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:09:11PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> rover, Jose Luis's sponsor and uploader of many of his packages including
> bacula, you can blame me also if you want
Others have pretty well addressed the rest of your message already. I'd
like to expand on this point.
I've be
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly asked
>> during the last months, and it was ignored by the maintainer. I'm not
>> aware of anything preventing this upload currently.
> The maintainer is not ignoring it, but the t
Roberto Lumbreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The package has bugs, lots of them, and for that reason has been removed
> from testing, well done, unstable it is here for that.
No, it isn't. Maybe experimental is for that; but unstable is for
software that is targetted to be moved to etch and to
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:09:11PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> The package has bugs, lots of them, and for that reason has been removed
> from testing, well done, unstable it is here for that.
Uh no. I find it scary that you share this same idea as the original
bacula maintainer. Unstable is
On 3/9/06, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/6/06, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I think you can tell pretty clearly that Bernd has no objection at all
> > to NMU's.
>
> yes, but please not for wishlist bugs. Again:
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
It would be great if we could move to GCC 4.1 for etch. The release
managers have now given us a concrete target we have to achieve before
this can happen: the majority of outstanding 4.1 specific bugs in
packages have to be fixed by mid of June [1]. The RC bu
> I am strongly against compressing PDFs
To add insult to injury, PDF 1.5 introduces ``object streams'' which
allow compressing arbitrarily long chunks of a PDF file without giving
up the random-access properties of PDF. All current Free PDF readers
grok PDF 1.5, although as far as I know no Free
* Roberto Lumbreras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't agree, all those things are not in my opinion enough for the
> hijacking.
Thankfully, you're wrong.
> The package has bugs, lots of them, and for that reason has been removed
> from testing, well done, unstable it is here for that.
It's *n
Hi Andi,
On Wednesday, 10 May 2006, you wrote:
> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
I know, tbm tried to build all packages on mips*. It would be intersting
to know, how other architectu
Roberto Lumbreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Ok, the maintainer has not fixed the bugs, has not packaged the last
> version of it in time, etc, but he has done a great job anyway, and I
> still don't see the point of hijacking the package.
So he has done not one of the things expected of
* Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 09:13]:
> I'd certainly prefer we shipped with the least bugs, rather than with
> "fairly recent" software; I don't know if these goals contradict or
> concur in this particular case.
FWIW, the GCC 4.0.3 Status Report (2006-01-15) says, "It's in
> I didn't hit this problem myself yet, but it has been mentioned on
> sparclinux list that 4.1 currently miscompiles the sparc kernel.
Do you know if this still happens, and if so, whether someone has
tracked it down?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 11:12:35AM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
>> > The rest of the system accounts are happily running with /bin/false
>>
>> There is now /bin/nologin which is more secure
>
> I think you mean /usr/sbin/nologin, right? Please define "more sec
On Tue, 9 May 2006 11:07:27, John Goerzen wrote:
: Hello,
:
: I intend to take over the Bacula package. I would first like to say
: thanks to Jose Luis Tallon for initially packaging it for Debian and
: maintaining it for these years.
:
: A brief history of why I intend to do this:
:
: * Bacul
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
