Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 16:46 +0200, martin f krafft a écrit : > also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]: > > * License : GPL v2 or later > > That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications. Why don't > you choose (if possible) a less "viral" licence?
I think this is the whole point of licensing a library under the GPL. There's not much point in using a copyleft if you allow proprietary applications to use the library. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
