also sprach Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.2219 +0200]: > I think this is the whole point of licensing a library under the GPL.
For me the point of a library is code reuse. Putting a library under the GPL is more of a political statement. > There's not much point in using a copyleft if you allow > proprietary applications to use the library. I still see a difference between cut-n-paste and link-to-library code reuse. From what I understand, if your product links to a GPL library, you have to make it GPL as well. We analysed the situation back when we wanted to make libhid Artistic and concluded that we cannnot do that because it links against hidparser, which is GPL'd. If our analysis was wrong, all the better... -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system stupidity management for the superuser is a user space issue in unix systems. -- alan cox
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
