On Mon, March 13, 2006 01:39, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:53:08PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>> It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a
>> month ago.
>
> Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split?
I don't think it's useful t
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:05:38AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
> Dpkg maintainer(s), what do you think is the correct procedure for
> additing these things i.e., extra -vendor and -libc fields? I already
> have a patch for dpkg package which adds-in uclibc variants...
Not being a dpkg maintainer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name
: briquolo
Version
: 0.5.5
Upstream Author : Cedric
Bregardis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL
: http://briquolo.free.fr/en/index.html
* License
: GNU GPL2
Description
: Fast paced 3d Breakout
This is
[Steinar H. Gunderson]
> Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split?
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone else.
I guess that one person got busy or demotivated. I suspect NEW
processing in D
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 12:20:25PM +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Actually, in case stockholm gets elected,
>
> Sorry, where's the Wiki page describing codenames for DPL candidates?
Wait, you mean we aren't putting
you are not francois massaquoi's son stop lying
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qtodo
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Tobias Glaesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://qtodo.berlios.de/tipiwiki/index.php
* License : GPL
Description : ToDo L
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:53:08PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month ago.
Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lukutoukka
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Juri Pakaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.iki.fi/juri/lukutoukka/
* License : GPL
Description : lukutoukka - sp
xvidcap -- 1 year. If the ffmpeg source code is removed from the source
package,
could this go in? FTPmasters?
mozilla-firefox-adblock -- 5 months. Why is this not going in?
cvsconnect, cvssuck -- 4 months. Why are these not going in or being rejected?
mozilla-thunderbird-locale-cs -- 3 mon
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lukutoukka
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Juri Pakaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.iki.fi/juri/lukutoukka/
* License : GPL
Description : lukutoukka - sp
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 00:04]:
I am adding some additional archs to my local installation like
i386-uclibc, which makes hurd-i386 an exception to the rule of
having the CPU arch first and the OS name the next.
There's also kfr
Richard B. Kreckel writes:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> >Your package fails to build with G++ 4.1. I'm filing this bug as
> >important for now, but when 4.1 will be the default compiler in
> >unstable (probably in a few weeks) I'll upgrade this to serious.
> >
> >
> Jeez, according to my avail
On 3/12/06, David Nusinow wrote:
> Please note that the usual way to do this is by
> filing a wishlist bug against the package, and I'd appreciate it if you use
> this mechanism so I can keep track of it easily.
ok, will do. i didn't think that this discussion fit nicely under a
single package.
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 00:04]:
> > I am adding some additional archs to my local installation like
> > i386-uclibc, which makes hurd-i386 an exception to the rule of
> > having the CPU arch first and the OS name the next.
> There's also kfreebsd-{i386,amd64}, so wh
Pjotr Kourzanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am adding some additional archs to my local installation like i386-uclibc,
> which makes hurd-i386 an exception to the rule of having the CPU arch first
> and the OS name the next.
There's also kfreebsd-{i386,amd64}, so why don't you use uclibc-i386?
Riku Voipio wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:49:01PM +0100, Peter Kourzanov wrote:
Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386
rather that i386-hurd?
because dpkg-architecture has a line like this:
return "$os-$cpu";
older dpkg (of sarge age) was more flexib
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
su, 2006-03-12 kello 15:49 +0100, Peter Kourzanov kirjoitti:
Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386
rather that i386-hurd?
I guess it just happened to seem like a good name at the time. Why, is
there a problem with the name? Does it m
Florian Ludwig wrote:
Peter Kourzanov wrote:
Dear DDs,
Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386
rather that i386-hurd?
Is there any rule that says that the OS name should come before CPU
name?
Is there any rule that says that the architecture should came before
Matthew R. Dempsky, le Sun 12 Mar 2006 14:09:54 -0600, a écrit :
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:21:40AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:43:34AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > This is a warning and not an error, because using one's own strdup()
> > > function (that woul
zope-popyda (non-US/main)
Maintainer: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James W. Penny)>
276820 [] [X] zope-popyda: FTBFS: ./config.status missing
Package: zoph (debian/main)
Maintainer: Edelhard Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
350717 [ S ] CVE-2006-0402: SQL injection vulnerability
--
This post i
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:49:01PM +0100, Peter Kourzanov wrote:
> Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386
> rather that i386-hurd?
because dpkg-architecture has a line like this:
return "$os-$cpu";
older dpkg (of sarge age) was more flexible, so likely the
hurd na
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:21:40AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:43:34AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > This is a warning and not an error, because using one's own strdup()
> > function (that would take ints) is perfectly legal.
>
> No, it is not. At least not with a
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060312 12:24]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Actually, in case stockholm gets elected,
>
> Sorry, where's the Wiki page describing codenames for DPL candidates?
Sorry for using the IRC name. I try to avoid that in mail, but failed
this tim
su, 2006-03-12 kello 15:49 +0100, Peter Kourzanov kirjoitti:
> Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386
> rather that i386-hurd?
I guess it just happened to seem like a good name at the time. Why, is
there a problem with the name? Does it matter? Debian architecture na
Peter Kourzanov wrote:
Dear DDs,
Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386
rather that i386-hurd?
Is there any rule that says that the OS name should come before CPU name?
Is there any rule that says that the architecture should came before the
OS name?
Pjotr
"Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Package name: libtest-use-ok-perl
[...]
> Description : Alternative to Test::More::use_ok
>
> According to the Test::More documentation, it is recommended to run use_ok()
> inside a BEGIN block, so functions are exported at c
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:21:46PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was recently browsing the web on a windows box and realized that
> over the last 4 years, I had forgotten how nice it is to be able
> browse back/forward with a single button click. So I set about
> enabling this func
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 04:52:04AM -1200, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> no manpages are not going to be renamed. but should be split of
> from manpages if they are linux specific to a package called linux-manpages.
>
> check the package that's in new queue now how it's done:
> http://io.debian.net/~tar/d
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 04:52:04AM -1200, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> >Wouldn't this package conflict with the 'manpages' package (which provides
> >them for GNU/Linux) and with the manpages provided by other (core)
> >packages?
> >Or are all manpages going to be renamed so that there is no filename
>
On the basis of the last proposal I made, I hereby declare the font
packaging team opened to all volunteers.
Up to now, I have added to the project, the following people who
explicitely requested to do so (and provided me with an Alioth login):
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
Paul Wise
Arne Götje
Norber
Peter Kourzanov wrote:
E. Voila! If you want to just try how it all works, point your apt at
http://www.xs4all.nl/~kurzanov/debian/ and install the versions of
dpkg, dpkg-cross, libuclibc0, libuclibc-dev,
uclibc-toolchain-i386-linux-uclibc that
can be found there.
Oeps, that should have be
Eric Cooper wrote:
Also, would you welcome patches that add the ability to handle
packages built with alternative libc implementations, namely uClibc,
Dietlibc and Newlib? Shall I file a "bug" report?
In the meantime, can you make these available somewhere? (I'm
interested in using dpkg-c
Marvin24 wrote:
> I noticed that on my two debian/sarge machines (ppc32 and amd64) most
> startscripts are ran twice. I don't know the package which this bug belongs
> to because the startup process is a little bit unclear to me. So I will try
> to explain how much I found out by now:
>
> Duri
Dear DDs,
Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386
rather that i386-hurd?
Is there any rule that says that the OS name should come before CPU name?
Pjotr Kourzanov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi people,
>
> I just wondered why exactly my laptop uses that much time for updates
> and I think that calling ldconfig is a main problem. In theory, it
> should not cost much time because VFS cache has the relevant file parts.
> However, if memory is li
On 3/11/06, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a warning and not an error, because using one's own strdup()
Is there any reason not to add an explicit declaration (in any case)?
> function (that would take ints) is perfectly legal. gcc-4.0 emits the
> warning to let the programm
Hi people,
I just wondered why exactly my laptop uses that much time for updates
and I think that calling ldconfig is a main problem. In theory, it
should not cost much time because VFS cache has the relevant file parts.
However, if memory is limited and there are other applications running,
the V
NB: This email and its contents are subject to the Eskom Holdings Limited EMAIL LEGAL NOTICE
which can be viewed at http://www.eskom.co.za/email_legalnotice
hi Debian
i am the youth developer since ten years ago now i am busy uplifting grade 10,11 & 12 , students now i do not know whe
Hi,
I noticed that on my two debian/sarge machines (ppc32 and amd64) most
startscripts are ran twice. I don't know the package which this bug belongs
to because the startup process is a little bit unclear to me. So I will try
to explain how much I found out by now:
During the boot process, fi
su, 2006-03-12 kello 12:20 +0100, Frank Küster kirjoitti:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Actually, in case stockholm gets elected,
>
> Sorry, where's the Wiki page describing codenames for DPL candidates?
db.debian.org lists them, though for clarity of discussion, it helps to
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, in case stockholm gets elected,
Sorry, where's the Wiki page describing codenames for DPL candidates?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guillaume Pellerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: netjack
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Torben Hohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://netjack.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : realtime audio tra
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:43:34AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> This is a warning and not an error, because using one's own strdup()
> function (that would take ints) is perfectly legal.
No, it is not. At least not with a compiler in hosted mode. In this
mode, the compiler is allowed to have an
44 matches
Mail list logo
