* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 00:04]:
> > I am adding some additional archs to my local installation like
> > i386-uclibc, which makes hurd-i386 an exception to the rule of
> > having the CPU arch first and the OS name the next.
> There's also kfreebsd-{i386,amd64}, so why don't you use uclibc-i386?Actually, I disagree. To me it makes perfect sense the way it currently is, namely: kernel-arch-libc kernel and libc can be empty when they're the default (Linux and glibc respectively). The uclibc port uses Linux so I think i386-uclibc is fine. There could be kfreebsd-i386-uclibc in the future, I suppose, or something like that. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
