On 3/11/06, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a warning and not an error, because using one's own strdup()
Is there any reason not to add an explicit declaration (in any case)? > function (that would take ints) is perfectly legal. gcc-4.0 emits the > warning to let the programmer know that he should disambiguate this by > either #including the usual C header, or by giving the prototype of his > own strdup() function. > > Anyway, such warnings deserve grepping, since they are evidence of a > potential binary break.
