Hi,
* Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-22 07:51]:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:07:39PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > Is it possible to mark a particular message to the BTS (as in
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) as spam? This information could be used for
> > filtering the web page reports, or possi
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 09:11:50PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:35:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > So give a reference or Message-ID of (what you consider) a sound argument
> > > that is not similar to "CIPE, and Windows driver developers who want to
> > > test
>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:35:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > So give a reference or Message-ID of (what you consider) a sound argument
> > that is not similar to "CIPE, and Windows driver developers who want to test
> > on Linux don't count."
>
> And that's what I mean -- there's nothing un
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:11:00AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > But afaik, you don't actually have access to that since it's on a
> > restricted access machine, so I'm at a loss as to what you're calling
> > "Debian's morgue".
> Merkel's
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:53:30PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: xserver-xair
> Version : 1.0.1
> Upstream Author : X.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.freedeskt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xserver-xair
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : X.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.freedesktop.org
* License : MIT/X
Description : X Server Featuring Acceler
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> But afaik, you don't actually have access to that since it's on a
> restricted access machine, so I'm at a loss as to what you're calling
> "Debian's morgue".
Merkel's mirror, most probably.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One d
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 09:57:21AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:04:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > In this case, even in the absence of free NDIS
> > > drivers, one could argue that the utility of having ndiswrapper in main
> > > (especially if it is integrated int
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:06:47PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> * Processing netbase
>- unstable: 4.24
>- main: 4.23ubuntu4
>- testing: 4.24
>- stable: 4.21
>- oldstable: 4.07
>- morgue: 4.22
> So the reason it didn't use 4.23 was simply t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: exscalibar
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Gavin Wood
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/exscalibar/
* License : GPL
Description : extendable, scalable architec
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 05:43:59PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:45:24PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > Please also stop insulting ndiswrapper users and developers by calling
> > > it a "warez wrapper".
>
> Actualy, since such "ndis drivers" are often provided with v
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 01:04:32AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:22:57PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> > * Package name: lanmap
> > Version : 0.1
> > Upstream Author : Ryan Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://pars
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:22:57PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> * Package name: lanmap
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Ryan Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://parseerror.com/lanmap/
> * License : GPL
> Description : lanmap sits quietly on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lanmap
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Ryan Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://parseerror.com/lanmap/
* License : GPL
Description : lanmap sits quietly on
You probably missed this question, which I also wanted to ask:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 03:55:23PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> "Scott James Remnant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And the reason 4.23 isn't in the morgue is simple, Debian's morgue ran
>> out of disk space a while ago.
> What is De
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:07:39PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Is it possible to mark a particular message to the BTS (as in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]) as spam? This information could be used for
> filtering the web page reports, or possibly training the s
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Is it possible to mark a particular message to the BTS (as in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]) as spam? This information could be used for
> filtering the web page reports, or possibly training the spam filter.
Visit http://bugs.debian.org/
Click: "Send a report th
Is it possible to mark a particular message to the BTS (as in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) as spam? This information could be used for
filtering the web page reports, or possibly training the spam filter.
Thanks!
Shaun
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:42:08PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * David Weinehall:
>
> >> Upstream includes non-free manpages these days, so in reality, we have
> >> already forked. Further Debian-specific changes are needed to address
> >> bugs such as #295211 (upstream does not document our l
On 2/21/06, Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/20/06, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As a specific counter example, consider
> > http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
> > which is a project porting a windows driver to linux. This port
> > appears to
On Feb 21, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The reason for contrib isn't practicality at all, it's to distinguish
> free software that stands on its own and that depends on non-free
> software. That's why it's specifically talked about in the social
> contract, rather than only being discussed in policy.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:04:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > In this case, even in the absence of free NDIS
> > drivers, one could argue that the utility of having ndiswrapper in main
> > (especially if it is integrated into the install) outweighs any potential
> > drawbacks (and since the o
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:58:37PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Title: multixterm -- drive multiple xterms separately or together
> > ITP: #353777
> Standard question: Do you know clusterssh, which does pretty much the
> same thing and is already in Debian? If no, I suggest you take look.
T
On 2/20/06, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a specific counter example, consider
> http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
> which is a project porting a windows driver to linux. This port
> appears to be possible because the windows driver was made
> available under a
also sprach Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.21.1643 +0100]:
> Launchpad does allow e-mail submission of support tickets and
> bugs, but only if your e-mail address is registered against
> a Launchpad account. I believe this is because they think it's
> the best way to avoid spam (
On 2/21/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.21.1506 +0100]:
> > File a request here:
> > https://launchpad.net/products/nda/+addticket
>
> This isn't a rant, but a serious wishlist request: if Canonical
> wants more coope
On 21 Feb 2006, Steve Langasek verbalised:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:40:06AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 05:36:13PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> I requested that ndiswrapper and ndiswrapper-modules-i386 be moved
>>> to contrib.
>> While I would personally rather se
also sprach Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.21.1506 +0100]:
> File a request here:
> https://launchpad.net/products/nda/+addticket
Scott, I appreciate your work and your mail to keep us up to date.
It's good to see you back at the keys!
This isn't a rant, but a serious wishli
"Scott James Remnant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And the reason 4.23 isn't in the morgue is simple, Debian's morgue ran
> out of disk space a while ago.
What is Debian's morgue? What about using snapshot.debian.net?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Foldi
As a few people have noticed, the Ubuntu patches repository is
currently producing some unusual results; in particular the patches
seem to include Debian changes as well as Ubuntu ones.
The patches are produced by a tool we oh-so-amusingly call NDA
(Nightly Difference Analysis), which like the MOM
Il giorno mar, 21/02/2006 alle 09.44 +, David Pashley ha scritto:
> > Typing in the stdin window while holding down the alt or meta keys sends an
> > escape character before the typed characters. This provides support for
> > programs such as emacs.
> >
> Why would I want to use this? I now
On 10572 March 1977, Kevin Mark wrote:
>> Only packages in NEW are checked, not every little bugfix upload. :)
> I probably need one of these two at the moment: 1) sleep 2) caffine so I
> mis-stated what NEW entails. It deals with initial uploads and other
> situations(at least new upstream and ot
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 08:34:22AM +, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 02:45 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > would it provide any automation or easier processing for the NEW
> > queue(ftpmasters)?
>
> I'd assume part of the FTP masters checking is actually verifying the
> license speci
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess the difference is more in the historic development than in
> actual technical differences. You can easily use Type1 fonts under X11
> if they are registered to defoma; I don't know about Openoffice and
> friends.
OpenOffice.org can use Latin Mo
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 02:45 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> would it provide any automation or easier processing for the NEW
> queue(ftpmasters)?
I'd assume part of the FTP masters checking is actually verifying the
license specified in debian/copyright is the license actually used by
the source, and
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:38:53PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> Practically, [contrib is] to avoid shipping things on our CDs that depend on
> stuff
> that's not on our CDs.
The reason for contrib isn't practicality at all, it's to distinguish
free software that stands on its own and that depends
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 05:17:56AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:10:27PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 04:58:07AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:48:30AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > > as I just wrote t
#include
* Thomas Bushnell BSG [Mon, Feb 20 2006, 09:35:14AM]:
> > No, it will never end. A few people managed to change the definition of
> > freedom which was commonly accepted when I joined the project nine years
> > ago and I do not feel a moral need to support their position.
>
> This is, I
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd be glad if you'd keep the Debian TeX Task Force (currently at
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED], soon at [EMAIL PROTECTED]) informed about
>> drafts of this policy. Although we don't currently package any TTF
>
>
> Of courseActually, I see some differenc
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:10:27PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 04:58:07AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:48:30AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > as I just wrote to Joerge, I am not refering to the initial upload of a
> > brand-new p
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10572 March 1977, Kevin Mark wrote:
>
> > I understand the general idea of a DFSG-free license but, for example,
> > if Clint uploads yet another zsh package bugfix, I'm not expecting him to
> > have
> > it under a different lice
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 04:58:07AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:48:30AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > You mean they check ever single time $RANDOM_PACKAGE enter NEW and don't
> > > assume its correct until someone raises an objections? I'd at lea
On 10572 March 1977, Kevin Mark wrote:
> I understand the general idea of a DFSG-free license but, for example,
> if Clint uploads yet another zsh package bugfix, I'm not expecting him to have
> it under a different license then the last 99 uploads. And if there was
> a license change, you could d
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:48:30AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Kevin Mark wrote:
> > You mean they check ever single time $RANDOM_PACKAGE enter NEW and don't
> > assume its correct until someone raises an objections? I'd at least
> > think you could create a sub-queue in NEW so that already tag
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 09:13:15PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:45:24PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > And for fuck's sake, stop filling up my inbox w/ this crap. I'm not
> > doing a thing unless either a) you people come to a consensus on the
> > issue (which you have
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:40:33AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10572 March 1977, Kevin Mark wrote:
>
> > You mean they check ever single time $RANDOM_PACKAGE enter NEW and don't
> > assume its correct until someone raises an objections?
>
> Yes. And the big number of rejects due to incorrect
Kevin Mark wrote:
> You mean they check ever single time $RANDOM_PACKAGE enter NEW and don't
> assume its correct until someone raises an objections? I'd at least
> think you could create a sub-queue in NEW so that already tagged
> standard licenses would get processed faster and others would be in
On Feb 20, 2006 at 20:43, gregor herrmann praised the llamas by saying:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> * Package name: multixterm
> Version : 1.8
> Upstream Author : Don L
On 10572 March 1977, Kevin Mark wrote:
> You mean they check ever single time $RANDOM_PACKAGE enter NEW and don't
> assume its correct until someone raises an objections?
Yes. And the big number of rejects due to incorrect debian/copyright
files (more than for technical reasons) shows that it is
On 10572 March 1977, Kevin Mark wrote:
> would it provide any automation or easier processing for the NEW
> queue(ftpmasters)?
Nope.
--
bye Joerg
Naturally; worms that don't know what they are doing end up as
fish bait, instead of getting invited into weird math experiments.
--
On 10572 March 1977, Jari Aalto wrote:
> To my understanding the only way to obtain the license information
> for a package is to actually download it (or install it) and the
> study the content of
> /usr/share/doc//copyright
Yes.
> Add new field to the debian/control (which would be generat
Note that there was a discussion using debtags for license information
on debtags-devel/debian-legal.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/06/msg00016.html
is a good starting point.
Personally I believe, that if such an information should be available,
debtags is more suitable to express thi
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:45:12AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:12:46PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
[License field]
> > In other words, it seems like a lot of work, and it's not clear what
> > problem it would really solve.
> Hi,
> would it provide any automation or easier p
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 03:54 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:35:52AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> >
> > [Kevin Mark]
> > > would it provide any automation or easier processing for the NEW
> > > queue(ftpmasters)?
> >
> > I doubt it. They don't take the maintainer's word f
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:35:52AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Kevin Mark]
> > would it provide any automation or easier processing for the NEW
> > queue(ftpmasters)?
>
> I doubt it. They don't take the maintainer's word for stuff like that,
> as I understand it - they double-check the co
[Kevin Mark]
> would it provide any automation or easier processing for the NEW
> queue(ftpmasters)?
I doubt it. They don't take the maintainer's word for stuff like that,
as I understand it - they double-check the copyright and license
declarations in the source code.
> would it allow for redu
56 matches
Mail list logo
