On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 09:11:50PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:35:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > So give a reference or Message-ID of (what you consider) a sound argument > > > that is not similar to "CIPE, and Windows driver developers who want to > > > test > > > on Linux don't count." > > And that's what I mean -- there's nothing unsound about saying those cases > > don't > > count; you just disagree with it. > The facts disagree with it. *That* is what makes it unsound, not what I > think.
Whether CIPE and Windows driver development "count" isn't a fact, it's an opinion. Since they're both thoroughly pointless, I don't think they do. It's fine that you disagree, but your opinion isn't the only one possible. > The reality is that we can't imagine all the uses our users might have for > this software, You don't have to imagine all the uses, just the realistic ones, which in this case is simply "running non-free Windows drivers for stuff". > and since it unambiguously fulfills the requirements, it should stay in main. Saying something is unambiguous doesn't make it so. Cheers, aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
