http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/09/04/134218&mode=thread
http://freshmeat.net/news/2000/09/04/968126399.html
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/2269/1/
http://www.trolltech.com/company/announce/generalpl.html
If that will become true, I'll stop whining about its licence.
--
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 02:51:46PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> Actually, that used to be a problem (I've had that as well, where an
> incorrectly configured X e.g. for a different card caused an infinite
> loop of switching to X and back again, so that you never have the
> chance of switching wit
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 02:35:00PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have one wav file that when vorbis-encoded does not play correctly with
> ogg123 but plays with the xmms plugin. Plus there is not any native esd
> support.
>
My memory is flakey, but I believe there *is* esd support, (liba
I have one wav file that when vorbis-encoded does not play correctly with
ogg123 but plays with the xmms plugin. Plus there is not any native esd
support.
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:03:15PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > lame/vorbis works al
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:32:07AM +0200, Per Lundberg wrote:
> How come Debian don't have a "non-X" runlevel, like some other
> distributions, in the default configuration? I think this would be
> pretty convenient.
Because no one has ever bothered to write a runlevel policy.
--
G. Branden Robi
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:03:15PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> lame/vorbis works alright. The problem I'm facing is lack of a good CLI
> ogg player.
Whats wrong with ogg123?
--
Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 04:05:27PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> > > I guess RevKrusty may want to put his packages into Debian?
> >
> > He already uploaded kdelibs, I didn't see if it was installed.
>
> I was wondering what happened to it? It didn't appear in the
> archives, it wasn't moved to R
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>
> Thus spake happ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > enough said
> > http://www.trolltech.com
> > now we can move the ftp://kde.tdyc.com/pub/kde potato kde2 contrib
> > back home
>
> Great! Has anyone yet packages available? If not, I'll be willing to ITP
> some.
Qt 2.2 hasn't be
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 03:20:40PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 04:55:51PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > > Who is going to ITP kde ?
> >
> > I guess RevKrusty may want to put his packages into Debian?
>
> He already uploaded kdelibs, I didn't see if it was installed.
I
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:29:32AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> packages into unstable. Helix is too stable for unstable, and too unstable
> for stable.
Not exactly true, as Helix Gnome is usually more cutting-edge than unstable
Gnome.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhi
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 04:55:51PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > Who is going to ITP kde ?
>
> I guess RevKrusty may want to put his packages into Debian?
He already uploaded kdelibs, I didn't see if it was installed.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
lame/vorbis works alright. The problem I'm facing is lack of a good CLI
ogg player.
Of course the other problem is the code not yet being optimised (and I'm
not complaining but..) and bogging down my poor P133. But then abcde could
go into main. ;)
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Peter Allen wrote:
> Daniel
Thus spake happ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> enough said
> http://www.trolltech.com
> now we can move the ftp://kde.tdyc.com/pub/kde potato kde2 contrib
> back home
Great! Has anyone yet packages available? If not, I'll be willing to ITP
some.
--
Kind regards,
+---
i'm a new maintainer, and maybe this is better directed at -mentors,
or maybe it's in the docs somewhere...if so, just point me that way,
please.
my main server is potato. is it "bad" for me to be building packages
there if they are destined for woody? should i start building on a
woody box?
--
> "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What does it do?
> > It has the same functionality as the date (1) program, only... It
> > has it in grammatically correct latin.
>
> Couldn't this be done with gettext and the normal date comand?
>
> --
> Peter
>
> - End for
Hugues Marilleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Who is going to ITP kde ?
>
> I'm dreaming about an "apt-get install kde" ...
>
Rather task-kde ;-) (SCNR)
Regards, Andy
--
Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Pfeilgasse 4-6/725 | A-1080 Wien |
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 02:44:44PM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> There are already loads of bugreports like that filed against
> webalizer, because people don't seem to bother checking the existing
> bugreports before fileing yet another one, and, worse, people are
> getting angry when you don
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 12:55:25PM +0200, Bernhard Josef Rieder wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 03:44:29AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> > > only been slightly modified. Penguin Command is
> > > completely licensed under the GPL, excluding the music.
>
> The problem with the music: it is f
>>"Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Julian> No, this isn't what I was talking about. There was a discussion
Julian> recently (should I try to track down the message numbers?) about some
Julian> packages which could not use the debconf database setup, for example
Julian> b
Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:37:20AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
> > Lame could be compiled with vorbis support enabled and mp3 disabled,
> > perhaps, and go into unstable/main. But would we have to excise the
> > mp3-specific parts in the source package in o
David Starner wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 05:06:34PM +0600, Sergey I. Golod wrote:
> > David Starner wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 03:15:10PM +0600, Sergey I. Golod wrote:
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > Why apt/dpkg doesn't use bzip2 for Packages file?
> > > >
> > > > -rw-r--r--
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:08:33PM +0200, happ wrote:
>
> enough said
>
> http://www.trolltech.com
>
> now we can move the ftp://kde.tdyc.com/pub/kde potato kde2 contrib
> back home
The sources have to be recompiled at least with the new Qt.
> WE WON !
Everyone won :)
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`R
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:30:06AM +0200, Per Lundberg wrote:
> > "EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> EB> perhaps because in the default configuration there is no
> EB> display manager, and thus no automatic runage of X.
>
> Sure. But whenever you install something t
enough said
http://www.trolltech.com
now we can move the ftp://kde.tdyc.com/pub/kde potato kde2 contrib
back home
WE WON !
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Marcelo,
>...
> Regarding the severity of the ftp.debian.org bug: important.
> Rationale: in the general case, packages that managed to get to this
> state are non-interesting (otherwise they would have been adopted
> already). That me
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 06:07:04PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Quoting BugScan reporter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Package: nscd (debian/main)
> > Maintainer: Joel Klecker
> > 58367 nscd: 'broken pipe' error causes entire box to be unusable
> > [IGNORE] No fix or workaround available for
> On 04 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > also debian believes in leaving the runlevel configuration to the
> > admin to define.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerfried Fuchs) wrote:
> Sure - but there is the FHS (I hope that I read it there) that
> defines what at least runlevel 2 and
Quoting BugScan reporter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Package: nscd (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Joel Klecker
> 58367 nscd: 'broken pipe' error causes entire box to be unusable
> [IGNORE] No fix or workaround available for potato (ajt)
Is this fixed in woody? I have been forced to shutdown nscd
tota
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:37:20AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
> Lame could be compiled with vorbis support enabled and mp3 disabled,
> perhaps, and go into unstable/main. But would we have to excise the
> mp3-specific parts in the source package in order to do so?
This is somethi
Lame could be compiled with vorbis support enabled and mp3 disabled,
perhaps, and go into unstable/main. But would we have to excise the
mp3-specific parts in the source package in order to do so?
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Samuel Hocevar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000, John O Sullivan wrote:
> > I'm su
Magellan is a personal information manager under development for KDE 2.0. I am
a close friend of the project leader and we've discussed this several times.
More details available from http://www.kalliance.org
The license is the MIT license.
I am not assuming that KDE will or will not make it into
On 2904T14+0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> getting angry when you don't reply to their requests within one hour,
> even if you are 'on leave' as stated on db.debian.org.
Nondevelopers do not have access to the away information in db.d.o.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 03:50:03PM +0200, Hugues Marilleau wrote:
> Who is going to ITP kde ?
I guess RevKrusty may want to put his packages into Debian?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Hugues Marilleau's letter:
> Who is going to ITP kde ?
>
> I'm dreaming about an "apt-get install kde" ...
>
> And what about Debian GNU/Hurd and Debian Win32 ? They are not Unix
> (Linux is ?) and only Qt/Unix is GPL ? I think this is a good reason
> to *not
On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> This would be managed through a simple (for sysvinit. I don't believe it'd
> be very complex for file-rc either, but I didn't check), standard
> script/program added to the sysvinit and file-rc packages (and any other
> future packages of the same s
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 03:50:03PM +0200, Hugues Marilleau wrote:
> And what about Debian GNU/Hurd and Debian Win32 ? They are not Unix
> (Linux is ?) and only Qt/Unix is GPL ? I think this is a good reason
> to *not* include KDE in Debian.
If there is a free version, the rest is a matter of port
> "SH" == Samuel Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The reason I ask is because I've been having this exact problem
>> with gpm lately. I like to start it occasionally, because it
>> interfers with my X configuration
SH>You might be interested in the `-R' option of gpm
Who is going to ITP kde ?
I'm dreaming about an "apt-get install kde" ...
And what about Debian GNU/Hurd and Debian Win32 ? They are not Unix
(Linux is ?) and only Qt/Unix is GPL ? I think this is a good reason
to *not* include KDE in Debian.
See http://www.trolltech.com/company/announce/genera
It appears from the apt documentation that it will only ever transfer a
maximum of one file per web-server by design (the documentation on Queue-Mode
in apt.conf(5) says that it will transfer one file per-host or one per URI
type).
I would like to transfer several files at a time to enable usable
G'day Joey,
I'm not subscribed to debian-devel, but wanted to add some comments on this
issue after reading the web archives. Because I'm not subscribed, I dunno if
my Cc to the list will work, in which case you can forward this to the list
as you see fit.
IMHO, the entire reason Helix exists as
On Mon, 04 Sep 2000, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> It's unfortunate that there's no easy way to find the current runlevel
> (the usual "who -r" from Solaris etc. doesn't work), otherwise this
> piece of code could be used:
>
> RL=`who -r`
> if [ -x
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > It still does not answer the original question which was about X-only/
> > non-X runlevel. In other words how to boot in multiuser mode selectively
> > with/without X. Which is quite a sensible question.
> >
> > Example:
> > I had to go int
Paul Slootman schrieb:
> On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
> Debhelper (and one of the other helper things) does this, if you
> don't call dh_installinit with the --no-restart-on-upgrade (or such)
> option. I guess the reasoning is that (a) you're upgrading in multiuser
> mode because debia
Hello.
Adrian Bunk schrieb:
> My suggestion for the Packages file is:
>
> There's a Packages.bz2 additionally to the Packages.gz . apt downloads by
> default the Packages.bz2, but you can tell apt to fetch the Packages.gz
> instead if you do have a slow machine. This solution has the advantage
>
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> It still does not answer the original question which was about X-only/
> non-X runlevel. In other words how to boot in multiuser mode selectively
> with/without X. Which is quite a sensible question.
>
> Example:
> I had to go into an inter
On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>
> Example:
> I had to go into an intermediate single user mode boot on some of
> my machines after forgetting to turn off xdm after changing video cards.
> Or during dealing with laptop docking gear.
> If there was a boot with X disabled and
On 04 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also debian believes in leaving the runlevel configuration to the
> admin to define.
Sure - but there is the FHS (I hope that I read it there) that defines
what at least runlevel 2 and 3 are for. I would really like to see that
Debian com
Frank writes:
> Isn't ctrl-alt-F[1-6] good enough to get into console mode? In what
> circumstances whould you not want X to start up on boot if you had
> installed a *dm?
a) You just made some changes in X that caused it to lock up the display.
Magic sysreq got you out alive, but now you would
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > The libgd maintainer decided to drop support for a libc5-based
> > libgd and renamed the libgd1g package to libgd1 (I personally don't
> > think that this was a good idea as it might cause problems during
> > upgrades).
>
> Do I interpret this right that I should file a
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 12:48:24PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > In the circumstance when you are serving a flock of dumb clients
> > from a single machine. NCD Xterms for example. In this case you *NEED* a
> > *dm
> > running with network access turned on but the machine itself may
Please refrain from Cc:ing me - I _do_ read the lists I'm posting to
*sigh* It seems that that can't be said often enough.
On 04 Sep 2000, Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The libgd maintainer decided to drop support for a libc5-based libgd and
> renamed the libgd1g package to libgd1 (I
On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Michael Bravo wrote:
> Monday, September 04, 2000, 3:01:42 PM, you wrote:
>
> PS> It's unfortunate that there's no easy way to find the current runlevel
> PS> (the usual "who -r" from Solaris etc. doesn't work)
>
> /sbin/runlevel can be used to find the current runlevel
So it
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:30:06AM +0200, Per Lundberg wrote:
> > "EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> EB> perhaps because in the default configuration there is no
> EB> display manager, and thus no automatic runage of X.
>
> Sure. But whenever you install something th
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 12:48:24PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>
> In the circumstance when you are serving a flock of dumb clients
> from a single machine. NCD Xterms for example. In this case you *NEED* a *dm
> running with network access turned on but the machine itself may not even
> h
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 02:25:39AM -0300, Nicol?s Lichtmaier wrote:
> > > > > I had a 486 with 8Mb and with `bzip2 -s' I could use bzipped packages
> > > > > perfectly... are we talking about 4 Mb mechines?
> > > > Do you realize how much ram dpkg itself already takes up? Add that to
> > > > bzip2
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000, Per Lundberg wrote:
> Are you *absolutely* sure? The reason I ask is because I've been
> having this exact problem with gpm lately. I like to start it
> occasionally, because it interfers with my X configuration
You might be interested in the `-R' option of gpm then.
Sam
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 12:48:24PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >
> > Isn't ctrl-alt-F[1-6] good enough to get into console mode? In what
> > circumstances whould you not want X to start up on boot if you had
> > installed a *dm?
> >
>
> In the circumstance when you are serving
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:30:06AM +0200, Per Lundberg wrote:
> Sure. But whenever you install something that gets you a display
> manager, your system will boot up in X. To get it to boot up in
> console mode, you have to manually remove the symlinks in your
> runlevel's script directory. The next
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:19:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:54:25AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > Um, why send such a message to a widely-read mailing-list?
>
> As a joke...
Im damned curious.. what did it say?
--
Michael Bea
[snip]
>
> Isn't ctrl-alt-F[1-6] good enough to get into console mode? In what
> circumstances whould you not want X to start up on boot if you had
> installed a *dm?
>
In the circumstance when you are serving a flock of dumb clients
from a single machine. NCD Xterms for example. In th
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> webalizer and linuxconf now depends on libgd1g, which currently isn't
> anymore available from our ftp-servers.
Not any longer. The newest linuxconf package in woody depends on the
new libgd1:
Package: linuxconf
[...]
Version: 1.20r2-1
Depends: netbase (>= 3.16-1), logrot
On 4 Sep 00 09:43:35 GMT, Per Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Sure. But whenever you install something that gets you a
>>> display manager, your system will boot up in X.
>EB> is that not what you wanted when you installe
4.09.2000 pisze Andrew M.A. Cater ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Two colleagues and myself have tried to get sound working
> on 2.2.17 systems with Potato.
Well, I can't confirm broken sound config. I didn't have any problems.
Stock Debian 2.2.17pre source with some usual patches (devfs for
example); `m
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 12:50:07PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
[...]
> It will break scripts, but it doesn't seem like anyone cares about
> that (Ohhh, I imagine there is a major flamer war going on
> somewhere). The future proof and locale portable way to do the above
> is:
>
> ls /dev/tty[[:lowe
On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Peter Makholm wrote:
handling of [a-z] discussion snipped
> ls /dev/tty[[:lower:]]0
Ugh. Whatever happened to lazy unix users? a-z is a lot easier to
type than [:lower:] .
I'd find it a lot more reasonable if [A-Z] was interpreted as
[A-Za-z].
Next step will be renaming ls
My suggestion for the Packages file is:
There's a Packages.bz2 additionally to the Packages.gz . apt downloads by
default the Packages.bz2, but you can tell apt to fetch the Packages.gz
instead if you do have a slow machine. This solution has the advantage
that there are no problems with old versi
Hello Paul,
Monday, September 04, 2000, 3:01:42 PM, you wrote:
PS> It's unfortunate that there's no easy way to find the current runlevel
PS> (the usual "who -r" from Solaris etc. doesn't work)
/sbin/runlevel can be used to find the current runlevel
--
Best regards,
Michael
On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
> also you mean that the symlinks are recreated, not just gpm being
> restarted right? there is an obnoxious behavior in debian where
> upgraded packages are started even if they were not running in the
> first place. (*cough* portmap *cough*) there was a
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:43:35AM +0200, Per Lundberg wrote:
> Maybe, but having the option to get into console mode too would be
> nice. Sometimes, you might not want X to start up when you reboot. (I
> don't do this very often, but I know there are people that do)
the key is not everyone does
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 03:44:29AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > only been slightly modified. Penguin Command is
> > completely licensed under the GPL, excluding the music.
The problem with the music: it is free distributable but the author
does not want it to be changed. Is there any licen
> "EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
EB> it leaves the decision where it belongs with me.
Yeah. I think you're right about this. I just got a little confused
with my gpm problems, I guess.
EB> if that is true (and your only removing SOME of the symlinks
EB> not ALL
Mirek Kwasniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Today I've trying (in bash):
>
> ls /dev/tty[a-z]0
>
> and answer has unexpected /dev/ttyI0 and /dev/ttyS0 followed by
> /dev/tty[a-z]0 entries.
I've seen this comming up a lot of places the past few months. It
looks like somebody wants to redefine
On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Per Lundberg wrote:
> Are you *absolutely* sure? The reason I ask is because I've been
Yes.
> having this exact problem with gpm lately. I like to start it
> occasionally, because it interfers with my X configuration, so I use
> to remove the symlinks. Each and every time gpm
Hi,
Some time ago I discoverd a problem with sort (from textutils). It doesn't
work for me :(. Maintainger of textutils package wrote me that is problem
only with my (pl_PL) locale. After that he discovered that even en_AU locale
is broken.
This bug (#69544) has been reassigned to libc6.
Today I
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000, John O Sullivan wrote:
> I'm surprised that lame hasn't been packaged already. Was it discussed and
> rejected previously?
You're right about the Fraunhofer problem. See the WNPP page at
http://www.debian.org/doc/prospective-packages.html (at the bottom).
Sam.
--
Samuel
> "EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Sure. But whenever you install something that gets you a
>> display manager, your system will boot up in X.
EB> is that not what you wanted when you installed *dm ?
Maybe, but having the option to get into console mode too woul
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:30:06AM +0200, Per Lundberg wrote:
[...] To get it to boot up in
>console mode, you have to manually remove the symlinks in your
>runlevel's script directory. The next time you update the display
>manager, you'll have to do this again. It is not really convenient.
Upgrad
On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Per Lundberg wrote:
> Sure. But whenever you install something that gets you a display
> manager, your system will boot up in X. To get it to boot up in
> console mode, you have to manually remove the symlinks in your
> runlevel's script directory. The next time you update the
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:30:06AM +0200, Per Lundberg wrote:
> > "EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> EB> perhaps because in the default configuration there is no
> EB> display manager, and thus no automatic runage of X.
>
> Sure. But whenever you install something th
> "EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
EB> perhaps because in the default configuration there is no
EB> display manager, and thus no automatic runage of X.
Sure. But whenever you install something that gets you a display
manager, your system will boot up in X. To get it to
Paul Slootman wrote:
> > On http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/developers.loc , there's supposed
> > to be a jpeg of a world map with debian developers. On the main
> > website, www.debian.org, there is.
> >
> > It seems that the .nl webserver is interpreting the filename
> > "developers.map.jpeg" as
On Sun 03 Sep 2000, Dr. Guenter Bechly wrote:
> I intend to package Country Codes 1.0.3, a text-based ISO3166 country code
> finder (yes, I know there is a Perl module that does the same, but this
> little tool is easier and more flexible). The package is actually already
> made
> and lintian cl
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:15:42AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> | The follwing packages need a new maintainer:
> | ...
> | mpsql (68054), 33 days old
I'm sorry, but I don't have the original mail anymore. But I thought it said
the packages including mpsql will be moved to project/orphane
LAME Ain't an MP3 Encoder
I'm surprised that lame hasn't been packaged already. Was it discussed and
rejected previously?
Original source available from http://www.sulaco.org/mp3
Licence is 100% GPL'ed code since May 2000
There is a possible problem with the Fraunhoffer (sp?) patent on mp3 but I
do
On Fri 01 Sep 2000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/developers.loc , there's supposed
> to be a jpeg of a world map with debian developers. On the main
> website, www.debian.org, there is.
>
> It seems that the .nl webserver is interpreting the filename
> "develo
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:32:07AM +0200, Per Lundberg wrote:
> (Sorry if this has been discussed earlier, and/or this is the wrong list...)
>
> How come Debian don't have a "non-X" runlevel, like some other
> distributions, in the default configuration? I think this would be
> pretty convenient.
(Sorry if this has been discussed earlier, and/or this is the wrong list...)
How come Debian don't have a "non-X" runlevel, like some other
distributions, in the default configuration? I think this would be
pretty convenient.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Hi,
>> Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:55:29AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > please do close bug #68054 if the package is no longer up for
^^
> > adoption. The number after th
Hello all,
Two colleagues and myself have tried to get sound working
on 2.2.17 systems with Potato.
[I have also tried on a Woody system]
Kernel builds - sound modules aren't there.
Devices in /dev are all there OK.
If the soundcard drivers are built into the kernel - all appears OK -
cat /de
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:55:29AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> please do close bug #68054 if the package is no longer up for
> adoption. The number after the package name is the bug number on
It is up for adoption but this is not the same as orphaned by any means.
> ...
> As to
On Fri 01 Sep 2000, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>
> What about for users who want to rebuild the package for whatever
> reasons? Many times you get half way through some huge package and it
> craps out because you didn't have some esoteric header file or
> library. Build-depends is invluable for avoi
>> Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:55:16PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > mpsql (68054), 33 days old
>
> How on earth did this make it onto your list. I cannot remeber orphaning it
> at all.
please do close bug #68054 if the package is no l
"Sergey I. Golod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>> Thus spake Sergey I. Golod ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> > Why apt/dpkg doesn't use bzip2 for Packages file?
>> > -rw-r--r--1 root root 749427 Sep 3 00:56 Packages.bz2
>> > -rw-r--r--1 root root 1024180 Sep
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:54:25AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> Um, why send such a message to a widely-read mailing-list?
As a joke...
--
G. Branden Robinson | Psychology is really biology.
Debian GNU/Linux| Biology is really chemistry.
[EMA
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:55:16PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> mpsql (68054), 33 days old
How on earth did this make it onto your list. I cannot remeber orphaning it
at all.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL
Hi!
I've noticed a serious problem with libgd1 (or, libgd1g) during the
last month. And I don't really know what to do about.
webalizer and linuxconf now depends on libgd1g, which currently isn't
anymore available from our ftp-servers. And on the other hand
libgd-perl depends on libgd1
On 2903T152152-0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
...
> -END PGP MESSAGE-
gpg: encrypted with 1024-bit ELG-E key, ID 22CC9EBE, created 2000-08-17
"Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: no secret key for decryption available
gpg: decryption faile
> > > > I had a 486 with 8Mb and with `bzip2 -s' I could use bzipped packages
> > > > perfectly... are we talking about 4 Mb mechines?
> > > Do you realize how much ram dpkg itself already takes up? Add that to
> > > bzip2 and you are definitely swapping, even with 8 megs of RAM. Heck,
> > > doing
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 09:07:42PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 12:31:03PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 03:12:40AM +0200, Enrique Robledo Arnuncio wrote:
> > > I have not found any other free graphical MIDI notator for
> > > linux. Maybe we wil
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 11:49:32PM -0300, Nicol?s Lichtmaier wrote:
> > > > > Speed reasons - gzip is significantly faster than bzip2, which matters
> > > > > for old ix86 (x=3,4) and m68k machines which run Debian.
> > > >
> > > > bzip2 also uses more memory which can be an issue with lowmemory
>
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
