> On 04 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > also debian believes in leaving the runlevel configuration to the > > admin to define.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerfried Fuchs) wrote: > Sure - but there is the FHS (I hope that I read it there) that > defines what at least runlevel 2 and 3 are for. I would really > like to see that Debian complies with the FHS in that case, when it > complies to it in the other meanings also, quite strict, even. Not quite. The FHS briefly mentions *System V's* runlevel 2 and 3 (along with Berkley's multiuser state). It does not specify anything about runlevels for Linux or any other OS. - Brian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]