Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes ("Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question"): > Right. But the 'trad Debian menu' (as outlined in Policy §9.6) has never > reached the point where "applications that need not be passed any > special command line arguments for normal operat

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Sam Hartman
Ian, I'd like to encourage you to use less loaded words than "destroy." When I hear that term and disagree with your analysis, my emotional reaction is strong enough that I stop reading. Your term is loaded enough that you lose the opportunity to try and get me to think about whether you are right

Bug#741573: #741573: Menu Policy and Consensus

2015-08-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#741573: #741573: Menu Policy and Consensus"): > Having such serious objections that have not been adequately considered > means you don't have rough consensus at least in the ways I judge rough > consensus. Thanks for your thoughtful response and care when reading. Ho

Bug#741573: #741573: Menu Policy and Consensus

2015-08-28 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: Ian> Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#741573: #741573: Menu Policy and Ian> Consensus"): >> Having such serious objections that have not been adequately >> considered means you don't have rough consensus at least in the >> ways I judge rough cons

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question"): > Ian, I'd like to encourage you to use less loaded words than > "destroy." I can see why you are objecting but I'm afraid I cannot see these proposals any other way. Perhaps as you suggest it would

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: Hi. I'd appreciate it if you would look at the restatement at the bottom and help me make sure I'm understanding the technical implications of the proposal we're considering. >> I think I may be following what Ian's saying. Ian> I agree with what you s

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question"): > I'd appreciate it if you would look at the restatement at the bottom and > help me make sure I'm understanding the technical implications of the > proposal we're considering. ... > That doesn't make

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Ian Jackson
I realise that it was perhaps a tactical error to send both (a) a message with impassioned rhetoric and (b) a message containing constructive proposal. Let me repost the proposal with some extra commentary: Ian Jackson writes: > I had an interesting and helpful conversation with a member of the K

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Ian Jackson wrote: > - defining new field names for .desktop files to contain >the trad menu metadata, as necessary. I think we can safely >call these fields X-Debian-* or X-Debian-Menu-* or something. What is the use case for these fields? > - a small amount of work in the already-

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Maybe some people need to get rid of that mentality where other people > have to do more work to comply with their twisted view of reality. Calling someone else's viewpoint twisted is needlessly inflammatory and not acceptable when discussing bugs wh

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le vendredi, 28 août 2015, 13.51:52 Ian Jackson a écrit : > Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes: > > Keith's proposal doesn't imply that the trad menu would "be > > destroyed" (your words), > > It does. There is nothing in Keith's proposal which preserves the > existing trad menu metadata. According to `

Bug#741573: #741573: Menu Policy and Consensus

2015-08-28 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Aug 28 2015, Ian Jackson wrote: [ things about the menu system ] This really has become a farce. This issue been open for more than a year. Sam rephrased the entire issue earlier this year in terms of consensus and has just finished his analysis. And now it seems the discussion is restarting a

Bug#741573: #741573: Menu Policy and Consensus

2015-08-28 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Nikolaus" == Nikolaus Rath writes: Nikolaus> On Aug 28 2015, Ian Jackson wrote: Nikolaus> [ things about the menu system ] Nikolaus> This really has become a farce. This issue been open for Nikolaus> more than a year. Sam rephrased the entire issue earlier Nikolaus>

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Friday 28 August 2015 16:06:45 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: [snip] > I think apparmor is a fine example: the maintainers of apparmor do > maintain the apparmor-profiles package which collects apparmor profiles > for packages that don't ship them (or that ship outdated or broken > ones). This give

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Friday 28 August 2015 13:27:54 you wrote: > On Friday 28 August 2015 16:06:45 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > [snip] > > > I think apparmor is a fine example: the maintainers of apparmor do > > maintain the apparmor-profiles package which collects apparmor profiles > > for packages that don't shi

Re: Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Sam Hartman
Hi. Your recent post to Ian is inappropriate and not consistent with the rules of conduct we've established for our communication. Multiple members of our community have talked to you about this issue. Please stop. owner@bugs and listmaster copied, although I will not request any specific action

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Thursday 27 August 2015 18:11:56 Ian Jackson wrote: > So the real dispute is: should the existing application metadata > database (currently represented by the Debian trad menu files in > existing packages): > > (a) continue to be maintained in its existing file format > > (b) be translated

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Matthew Vernon
On 28/08/15 19:22, Sune Vuorela wrote: On Thursday 27 August 2015 18:11:56 Ian Jackson wrote: (c) be destroyed. Given that there are people who want to maintain it, I think (c) is unacceptable.[1] Unfortunately, the people who wants to maintain it are not the same people who has to carry

Bug#741573: Voting on Debian Menu Policy next Tuesday

2015-08-28 Thread Sam Hartman
hi. Keith and I hashed out proposed changes to option D on IRC. Unless there are significant concerns raised by TC members, I plan to call for votes on the following ballot next Tuesday. Whereas: 1. The Debian Policy Manual states (§9.6) that 'The Debian menu package provides a standar

Bug#741573: #741573: Menu Policy and Consensus

2015-08-28 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Aug 28 2015, Sam Hartman wrote: >> "Nikolaus" == Nikolaus Rath writes: > > Nikolaus> On Aug 28 2015, Ian Jackson > wrote: > Nikolaus> [ things about the menu system ] > > Nikolaus> This really has become a farce. This issue been open for > Nikolaus> more than a year. Sam

Bug#741573: Proposed draft of ballot to resolve menu/desktop question

2015-08-28 Thread Keith Packard
Ian Jackson writes: > * Overall, this would make it possible, therefore, to maintain the >menu information primarily in the more sophisticated .desktop >format, so that source packages with .desktop files would not need >to contain trad menu files too. Yes, the wording that Sam and