Le dimanche 28 novembre 2004 à 22:48 +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan a
écrit :
> > Proably because there are no udebs at all, let alone kernel udebs, on
> > the second CD. So I'm reassigning this to debian-cd; if the second full
> > CD is intended to be bootable, it needs to have the d-i udebs on i
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:12:53PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> What's the point of booting from the second CD? Will it use syslinux
> instead of isolinux for old systems that cannot handle isolinux?
Yes - my impression with woody is that a number of machines out there
cannot boot using syslinux. Apa
Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> > Proably because there are no udebs at all, let alone kernel udebs, on
> > the second CD. So I'm reassigning this to debian-cd; if the second full
> > CD is intended to be bootable, it needs to have the d-i udebs on it.
>
> :-??? Does this seem reasonable? I mean
> Proably because there are no udebs at all, let alone kernel udebs, on
> the second CD. So I'm reassigning this to debian-cd; if the second full
> CD is intended to be bootable, it needs to have the d-i udebs on it.
:-??? Does this seem reasonable? I mean, isn't it more reasonable to inform
the u
reassign 283137 debian-cd
thanks
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> This report was done with RC2 CDs, downloaded via bittorrent
>
> Known by my will to do weird things, this time I tried booting from the
> second CD, instead of the first. It listed only "linux" and "expert" as
> booting methods, so I
5 matches
Mail list logo
