Le dimanche 28 novembre 2004 à 22:48 +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan a écrit : > > Proably because there are no udebs at all, let alone kernel udebs, on > > the second CD. So I'm reassigning this to debian-cd; if the second full > > CD is intended to be bootable, it needs to have the d-i udebs on it. > > :-??? Does this seem reasonable? I mean, isn't it more reasonable to inform > the user of this problem and ask him to change the cd and introduce the one > with the udebs on it rather than having the udebs on each bootable cd?
I agree with you. Responding to Joey Hess : > What's the point of booting from the second CD? > Will it use syslinux instead of isolinux for old systems that cannot > handle isolinux? Yes, that was the idea of the other bootable images... keep syslinux for machines were isolinux is failing. I'm against copying udebs on all CD, so if d-i doesn't support the suggestion above we'll just remove the possibility to boot on other CD than the first. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
