> Proably because there are no udebs at all, let alone kernel udebs, on > the second CD. So I'm reassigning this to debian-cd; if the second full > CD is intended to be bootable, it needs to have the d-i udebs on it.
:-??? Does this seem reasonable? I mean, isn't it more reasonable to inform the user of this problem and ask him to change the cd and introduce the one with the udebs on it rather than having the udebs on each bootable cd? Regards... -- Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
