About jigdo, pre12-14, etc

2002-07-01 Thread Mantas K.
Hi, Cool, in pre 12-14 are all user-friendly tools, that I mentioned several times :) But it won't be good if powerpc loses mc from 1st CD :( Also I found one problem - in jigdo files there are no md5sum section of template file. This is pretty bad, because I had to restart jigdo-lite for few

Improving woody installation? NOT to late !!!

2002-06-18 Thread Mantas K.
Hi, Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If there are some packages, that are important to newbies and are in no task >> (and not marked as standard) and so newbies will only see them once they've >> stopped being newbies, then we really have to do something to ease their fate :) > > Agree

About harware detection and configuration tools in 1st CD

2002-05-31 Thread Mantas K.
Hello, I still think, that including some packages on 1st CD (which use just little space) would improve much debian woody installation from CDs. I got no answer to my suggestions about improving 1st debian CD and desktop task from official maintainer :( Previously Philip Hands wrote: > OK, th

About the improving of 1st debian CD (there are some 'duplicates',etc.)

2002-05-30 Thread Mantas K.
Hi again, I got no answer to my suggestions about improving 1st debian CD and desktop task :( Maybe debian-cd maintainer can say if 1st CD would include more packages for beginners: hardware autodetection packages, user-friendly package managers, user-friendly configuration tools, etc. and wo

Re: Re: About the improving of 1st debian CD (there are some 'duplicates',etc.)

2002-05-24 Thread Mantas K.
Hi again, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Take care, some packages may be there because they are part of a task. >Double check that before deciding to exclude a package from CD1. I know, but we can split task between 1st and 2nd CD or remove for example *-dev packages from task an

About the improving of 1st debian CD (there are some 'duplicates',etc.)

2002-05-24 Thread Mantas K.
Hi, I found some 'duplicates' in the 1st debian CD: emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_i386.deb - ~10MB emacs20_20.7-13.1_i386.deb - ~9MB emacs21_21.2-1_i386.deb - ~12MB I understand - emacs is a very goot thing, but I think 3 different versions of emacs in the1st CD is a luxury. Maybe only one, newest versi

Re: About 1st debian CD

2002-05-04 Thread Mantas K.
o some automated test to ensure. >> second CD contains packages, that depends on other packages that are not in >> the first and second CD's and so on :( > > Could you cite some examples please. Mantas K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

About 1st debian CD

2002-05-03 Thread Mantas K.
Hi, I think 1st debian CD is very important for all users, especially for beginners and should not contain duplicates like now: See for example /pool/main/k - there are about 130MB of various kernel-images: /kernel-image-2.2.20-i386 - ~9MB /kernel-image-2.2.20-reiserfs-i386 - ~2MB /ke

Anarchy on CD's (lot of packages on first CD depends on packagesthat are not in the first CD, etc)

2002-05-02 Thread Mantas K.
Hi, I love debian, but I not understand why there are anarchy with packages on CD's) I just want to ask: Why there are *big* anarchy (with packages) on first CD of pre2 ? There are no xserver-common, no xserver-xfree86, no xserver-common-v3, no xfonts, etc. but there are included many X applica