Hi again, I'm talking about semi-official (?) prerelease CD's from: http://cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/ (pre2) and from: http://cdimage.debian.org/pre-release-jigdo/ (pre1, See http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2002/18/ and http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2002/debian-cd-200204/msg00435.html)
Now I see pre3 in http://cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/ and there is anarchy in 1st CD too :( for example now mc-common and gmc are included in 1st CD, but there is no mc package and no xserver (now xfonts-75dpi are included in first CD, this is good, but all kernel-images-2.4.16 are still in 1st CD and maybe because of this full x-window-system does not fit in 1st CD) See list of packages, included in 1st CD on http://cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/3.0-pre3/jigdo/i386/woody-i386-1_NONUS.jigdo (this is gzipped text file) Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In previous prelelease (debian-30pre1-i386-binary-1_NONUS.iso) almost all >> x-window-system packages were in the 1st CD, why in pre2 most X packages >> are moved in second CD ? > > 1. What CD images are you referring to? The ones on ftp.fsn.hu are > unofficial, as are any other CD images floating around on the net. OK, I think that full x-window-system is most important (the majority of games, junior and science packages are not usefull without full x-window-system (xserver-xfree86, xserver-common, xfonts-base, xfonts-100dpi, xfonts-75dpi, maybe xfonts-*-transcoded, etc) Philip Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the tip about the kernel images, this could mean that all of > games, junior and science will end up on the first CD. I don't know about true Depend (I've not tested, because my debian system is full of packages and I don't know how to make a test without reinstaling OS. Maybe we just need to set the priorities differently for which packages to go on which CD. Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is that actually true do the "Depend" or are you just saying that most > people won't have much use for abiword if they don't have an xserver on > the same machine. Sorry, I did some manual tests of second CD (with mc) and didn't find any packages that really Depends on packages not from first or second CDs :( Maybe this is my mistake ? We need to do some automated test to ensure. >> second CD contains packages, that depends on other packages that are not in >> the first and second CD's and so on :( > > Could you cite some examples please. Mantas K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
