Package: wireguard-dkms
Version: 1.0.20200429-1~bpo10+1
Followup-For: Bug #959157
Dear Maintainer,
look like problem is still here:
$ sudo aptitude -f install
The following partially installed packages will be configured:
wireguard wireguard-dkms
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or re
On Fri, 1 May 2020 15:30:40 + Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> The changes made do not address the bug, I'm afraid. wireguard-dkms
> fails to install because kernel-image 4.19.0-9 includes a backported
> change that is not caught by the pragmas in compat.h. This backport
> might be a Debian-ism that pe
Package: wireguard-dkms
Followup-For: Bug #959157
Dear Maintainer,
wireguard-dkms 1.0.20200429-2 (from unstable) compile module successfully
so this set fixed the problem for me
$ dpkg -l | grep wireguard
ii wireguard 1.0.20200319-1~bpo10+1 all
ii wireguard-dkms
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 958419 swi-prolog/8.1.29+dfsg-2
Bug #958419 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [src:swi-prolog, src:eye]
swi-prolog breaks eye autopkgtest: Failed 7/15 subtests
Marked as fixed in versions swi-prolog/8.1.29+dfsg-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 954259 + pending
Bug #954259 [src:innoextract] src:innoextract: fails to migrate to testing for
too long
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
954259: https://bugs.debian.org/
Package: debhelper
Version: 13
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
Dear Maintainer,
when upgrading to dh 13 with ebumeter, dh complains about source files from
ebumeter/source missing in the binary.
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/ebumeter
B
Hi Craig,
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 10:31:24AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> This is the analysis of the latest WordPress security bugs.
> Is it awesome upstream already has CVE IDs and (almost) clear patches of
> the fixes? Yes, it is!
>
> Sid: 5.4
> All vulnerabilities, use upstream 5.4.1
>
> Bull
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 959421 upstream
Bug #959421 [debhelper] debhelper 13 complains about source files missing in
the binary of ebumeter
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #959421 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #959421 [debhelper] debhelper 13 complains about source files missing in
the binary of ebumeter
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #959421 [debhelper] debhelper 13 complains about source files missing in
the binary
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Dennis Braun:
> Package: debhelper
> Version: 13
> Severity: serious
> Tags: upstream ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> when upgrading to dh 13 with ebumeter, dh complains about source files from
> ebu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 930991 gajim in Debian stretch does not start anymore
Bug #930991 [gajim] gajim in Debian Stable does not start anymore
Changed Bug title to 'gajim in Debian stretch does not start anymore' from
'gajim in Debian Stable does not start anym
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 11:18:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#954691: fixed in stunnel4 3:5.56+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #954691,
regarding stunnel4: FTBFS: A fatalerror occurred writing to the 127.0.0.1:48164
connection: Connection reset by peer
to be mark
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 956735 normal
Bug #956735 [qv4l2] qv4l2: No sound when capture a video VHS.
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
956735: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #959393 [ruby2.7] ruby2.7 breaks diaspora-installer autopkgtest: sh: 1:
bundle: not found
Added tag(s) pending.
--
959393: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959393
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #959393 in ruby reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby/-/commit/969df5fe2fae4176f8061d333e20c9de652a7
Am Freitag, den 01.05.2020, 21:20 -0300 schrieb Antonio Terceiro:
> Control: reassign -1 libruby2.7
> Control: found -1 2.7.0-6
>
> On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:12:57PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > Control: reassign -1 ruby2.7
> > Control: found -1 2.7.0-6
> >
> > On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:2
Package: openexr
Version: 2.3.0-6
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for openexr, all are
fixed in 2.4.1.
CVE-2020-11758[0]:
| An issue was discovered in OpenEXR before 2.4.1. There is an out-of-
| bounds rea
Package: s3ql
Version: 3.3.2+dfsg-2+b1
Followup-For: Bug #959117
Dear Maintainer,
This seems to be solved by upstream's commit
752da96c1b0c71e666ac0263eaa46b1620f32e92,
which is preset in release-3.4.0
It's also worth updating the "Homepage:" field, as the project has moved to
https://github.c
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 02:59:36PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 01.05.2020, 21:20 -0300 schrieb Antonio Terceiro:
> > Control: reassign -1 libruby2.7
> > Control: found -1 2.7.0-6
> >
> > On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:12:57PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > Control: reassign -1
Package: src:am-utils
Version: 6.2+rc20110530-3.2
Severity: serious
linux-kernel-headers was removed from unstable in 2007 (I think). It
is now effectively a virtual package provided by linux-libc-dev, but
it's not a documented virtual package name and I would like to stop
providing it. Please c
Package: src:array-info
Version: 0.16-4
Severity: serious
linux-kernel-headers was removed from unstable in 2007 (I think). It
is now effectively a virtual package provided by linux-libc-dev, but
it's not a documented virtual package name and I would like to stop
providing it. Please change the
Package: src:dvbtune
Version: 0.5.ds-1.1
Severity: serious
linux-kernel-headers was removed from unstable in 2007 (I think). It
is now effectively a virtual package provided by linux-libc-dev, but
it's not a documented virtual package name and I would like to stop
providing it. Please change the
Package: src:dvbstream
Version: 0.6+cvs20090621-2
Severity: serious
linux-kernel-headers was removed from unstable in 2007 (I think). It
is now effectively a virtual package provided by linux-libc-dev, but
it's not a documented virtual package name and I would like to stop
providing it. Please c
Package: src:inotify-tools
Version: 3.14-8
Severity: serious
linux-kernel-headers was removed from unstable in 2007 (I think). It
is now effectively a virtual package provided by linux-libc-dev, but
it's not a documented virtual package name and I would like to stop
providing it.
linux-libc-dev
Package: src:isakmpd
Version: 20041012-8
Severity: serious
linux-kernel-headers was removed from unstable in 2007 (I think). It
is now effectively a virtual package provided by linux-libc-dev, but
it's not a documented virtual package name and I would like to stop
providing it.
linux-libc-dev is
Package: src:fakeroot-ng
Version: 0.18-4
Severity: serious
linux-kernel-headers was removed from unstable in 2007 (I think). It
is now effectively a virtual package provided by linux-libc-dev, but
it's not a documented virtual package name and I would like to stop
providing it.
linux-libc-dev is
On Fri, 1 May 2020 09:18:20 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Source: libcap-ng
> Version: 0.7.9-2.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs patch
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: rebootstrap
>
> libcap-ng fails to build from source, because linux-libc-dev no longer
> provides linux-kernel-headers, wh
Package: src:matchbox-panel
Version: 0.9.3-10
Severity: serious
linux-kernel-headers was removed from unstable in 2007 (I think). It
is now effectively a virtual package provided by linux-libc-dev, but
it's not a documented virtual package name and I would like to stop
providing it.
linux-libc-d
Package: src:netsend
Version: 0.0~svnr250-1.3
Severity: serious
linux-kernel-headers was removed from unstable in 2007 (I think). It
is now effectively a virtual package provided by linux-libc-dev, but
it's not a documented virtual package name and I would like to stop
providing it.
linux-libc-d
Package: src:paxtest
Version: 1:0.9.15-1
Severity: serious
linux-kernel-headers was removed from unstable in 2007 (I think). It
is now effectively a virtual package provided by linux-libc-dev, but
it's not a documented virtual package name and I would like to stop
providing it.
linux-libc-dev is
Package: src:raidutils
Version: 0.0.6-22
Severity: serious
linux-kernel-headers was removed from unstable in 2007 (I think). It
is now effectively a virtual package provided by linux-libc-dev, but
it's not a documented virtual package name and I would like to stop
providing it.
linux-libc-dev is
Actually, since linux-libc-dev is (transitively) build-essential, you
do not need to Build-Depend on it at all.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Actually, since linux-libc-dev is (transitively) build-essential, you
do not need to Build-Depend on it at all.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Actually, since linux-libc-dev is (transitively) build-essential, you
do not need to Build-Depend on it at all.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Actually, since linux-libc-dev is (transitively) build-essential, you
do not need to Build-Depend on it at all.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 959462 with 959225 959451 959452 959453 959454 959455 959456 959457
> 959458 959459 959460 959461
Bug #959462 [linux-libc-dev] Provides undocumented virtual package
linux-kernel-headers
959462 was not blocked by any bugs.
959462 was not bl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 955689 + fixed-upstream
Bug #955689 [src:libcatmandu-filestore-perl] libcatmandu-filestore-perl: FTBFS:
dh_auto_test: error: perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 17:04:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959223: fixed in librime 1.5.3+dfsg1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #959223,
regarding fcitx won't start anymore
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 17:18:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959378: fixed in gap-guava 3.15+ds-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #959378,
regarding gap-guava-bin: please update for new GAP ABI
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Processing control commands:
> tags 955680 + patch
Bug #955680 [src:birdfont] birdfont: FTBFS: ld: build/bin//libbirdfont.so:
undefined reference to `cairo_gobject_surface_get_type'
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 955680 + pending
Bug #955680 [src:birdfont] birdfont: FTBFS: ld: build/bin//libbirdfont.
Control: tags 955680 + patch
Control: tags 955680 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for birdfont (versioned as 2.28.0-1.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru birdfont-2.28.0/debian/changelog birdfont-2.28.0/debian/
Package: orthanc-dicomweb
Version: 1.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
x-debbugs-cc: node-axios
My self-contained buildability check script detected that armel binaries for
orthanc-dicomweb were present in testing, but the build-dependencies for
orthanc-dicomweb could not be satisified on armel. Speci
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 944018 with 950611
Bug #944018 [ocsinventory-reports] ocsinventory-reports: depends on no longer
available libjs-select2.js
944018 was not blocked by any bugs.
944018 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 944018: 950611
> than
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 920261 serious
Bug #920261 [ocsinventory-reports] ocsinventory-reports doesn't depend on
php-zip
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
920261: https://bu
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 18:48:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959461: fixed in raidutils 0.0.6-23
has caused the Debian Bug report #959461,
regarding raidutils: Build-Depends on obsolete package linux-kernel-headers
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Package: screenkey
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The python3 version seems almost entirely broken on my Debian testing system.
Almost all settings are ignored, regardless of whether I change them using
command-line switches or the settings GUI. Backspace s
Control: tags 954259 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for innoextract (versioned as 1.8-1.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru innoextract-1.8/debian/changelog innoextract-1.8/debian/changelog
--- innoextract-1.8/d
Processing control commands:
> tags 954259 + patch
Bug #954259 [src:innoextract] src:innoextract: fails to migrate to testing for
too long
Added tag(s) patch.
--
954259: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954259
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:55:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959213: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937431,
regarding pyepl: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:54:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959203: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #935413,
regarding ruby2.5: flaky autopkgtest: base dir expected vs actual mismatch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:55:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959216: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #956862,
regarding ho22bus: Consider removing this package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:55:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959217: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #955792,
regarding python-imaging-doc-handbook: Please remove this package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:52:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959200: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937484,
regarding pymtp: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:58:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959370: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #941539,
regarding mh-e: build-depend on texlive-plain-generic, not obsolete
texlive-generic-recommended
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:58:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959370: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #934993,
regarding mh-e: FTBFS because transitional emacs25 et al. doesn't exist anymore
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:57:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959368: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #918241,
regarding frown FTBFS: Fails to build docs - missing font, plue more problems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:58:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959371: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #932951,
regarding pspp build-depends on cruft package.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:57:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959369: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #932949,
regarding gri build-depends on cruft package.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:56:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959218: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #956472,
regarding atitvout: Consider removing this package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:59:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959372: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #941513,
regarding c-graph: build-depend on texlive-plain-generic, not obsolete
texlive-generic-recommended
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:57:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959368: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #895376,
regarding frown FTBFS: Encountered missing dependencies: base <4.10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:57:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959369: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #941557,
regarding gri: texi file need @documentencoding
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:58:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959370: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #935041,
regarding mh-e: unbuildable in testing due to missing B-D
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 20:57:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959369: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #941557,
regarding gri: texi file need @documentencoding
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 21:01:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959435: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #953376,
regarding src:mailman: Depends/Build-Depends on cruft package python-dnspython
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 21:01:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#959435: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #958930,
regarding mailman: CVE-2020-12137
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 21:04:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#956359: fixed in netgen 6.2.1804+dfsg1-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #956359,
regarding netgen: FTBFS with new opencascade 7.4 (library transistion)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 953369 3.8.3~rc1-1
Bug #953369 [libpython3.8-minimal] RuntimeWarning: line buffering (buffering=1)
isn't supported in binary mode, the default buffer size will be used
Bug #953125 [libpython3.8-minimal] libpython3.8-minimal:
/usr/lib/pytho
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 21:22:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#958051: fixed in homebank 5.3.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #958051,
regarding src:homebank: fails to migrate to testing for too long
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 959453 + sid bullseye
Bug #959453 [src:dvbstream] dvbstream: Build-Depends on obsolete package
linux-kernel-headers
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
> tags 959455 + sid bullseye
Bug #959455 [src:fakeroot-ng] fakeroot-ng: Build-Depends on obsol
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 21:48:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952619: fixed in deltachat-core 0.45.0+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #952619,
regarding deltachat-core: FTBFS: dh_auto_configure: error: cd
obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 meson .. --wrap-mode=n
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 21:48:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952619: fixed in deltachat-core 0.45.0+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #952619,
regarding deltachat-core: FTBFS: dh_auto_configure: error: cd
obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 meson .. --wrap-mode=n
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1.0.8-1
Bug #929450 [caml-crush] caml-crush, build-dependencies unsatisfiable on armel
There is no source info for the package 'caml-crush' at version '1.0.8-1' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.0.8-1'
Marked as found in ve
Control: found -1 1.0.8-1
Control: tag -1 = sid
Control: close -1
On Tue, 09 Jul 2019 13:56:40 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The armel binaries have been removed from sid.
and buster, too.
Andreas
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #958789 [src:libmodule-manifest-skip-perl] libmodule-manifest-skip-perl:
FTBFS and unusable: Can't locate object method "_install_subs"
Added tag(s) pending.
--
958789: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958789
Debian Bug Tracking
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #958789 in libmodule-manifest-skip-perl reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libmodule
Your message dated Sat, 02 May 2020 23:49:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#958789: fixed in libmodule-manifest-skip-perl 0.23-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #958789,
regarding libmodule-manifest-skip-perl: FTBFS and unusable: Can't locate object
method "_install_subs"
to be marke
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 912941 serious
Bug #912941 [src:mozjs52] mozjs52: No longer maintained upstream
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 908234 serious
Bug #908234 [src:cjs] cjs: Please switch to mozjs60
Severity set to 'serious' from 'impor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 958841 erlang/1:22.3+dfsg-1
Bug #958841 {Done: Sergei Golovan } [src:erlang,
src:elixir-lang] erlang breaks elixir-lang autopkgtest: killed
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #958841 to the same values
previously set
> than
Source: salmon, trinityrnaseq
Control: found -1 salmon/1.2.1+ds1-1
Control: found -1 trinityrnaseq/2.6.6+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of
Processing control commands:
> found -1 salmon/1.2.1+ds1-1
Bug #959503 [src:salmon, src:trinityrnaseq] salmon breaks trinityrnaseq
autopkgtest: /usr/bin/ParaFly -c recursive_trinity.cmds -CPU 2 -v -shuffle died
with ret 256
Marked as found in versions salmon/1.2.1+ds1-1.
> found -1 trinityrnaseq
82 matches
Mail list logo
