Am Freitag, den 01.05.2020, 21:20 -0300 schrieb Antonio Terceiro: > Control: reassign -1 libruby2.7 > Control: found -1 2.7.0-6 > > On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:12:57PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Control: reassign -1 ruby2.7 > > Control: found -1 2.7.0-6 > > > > On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:23:56PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > Using system bundler... > > > Installing gems with rubygems ... > > > sh: 1: bundle: not found > > > > libruby2.7 now has some Provides: for libraries builtin to the standard > > library, including ruby-bundler. But since ruby-bundler also provides a > > `bundle` binary, which libruby2.7 does not, then this Provides: is not > > really correct. > > > > Instead, libruby2.7 should depend on ruby-bundler, like it already does on > > rake, ruby-test-unit and others, and not provide it. > > It's on libruby2.7, not ruby2.7
The binary is in ruby2.7. IMHO our approach should be: - ship a symlink /usr/bin/bundle -> /usr/bin/bundle2.7 with ruby(-defaults), - handle the symlink via dpkg-divert if ruby-bundler gets installed, and - keep the provides in libruby2.7. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ > Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list > pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers -- Regards, Daniel Leidert <dleid...@debian.org> | https://www.wgdd.de/ GPG-Key RSA4096 / BEED4DED5544A4C03E283DC74BCD0567C296D05D GPG-Key ED25519 / BD3C132D8B3805D1808123AB7ACE00941E338C78 If you like my work consider sponsoring me via https://www.patreon.com/join/dleidert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
