Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1
> tags 498621 - pending
Bug#498621: PHP5 - ext/standard/rand.c is not dfsg conform
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:02:03 GMT
with message-id <200901272002.n0rk23xo009...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line slocate has been removed from Debian, closing #502005
has caused the Debian Bug report #502005,
regarding Removing slocate 3.1-1.1 breaks
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:00:50 GMT
with message-id <200901272000.n0rk0otm009...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line sfs has been removed from Debian, closing #499244
has caused the Debian Bug report #499244,
regarding sfs: should this package be removed?
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:00:52 GMT
with message-id <200901272000.n0rk0qfx009...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line sfs has been removed from Debian, closing #453259
has caused the Debian Bug report #453259,
regarding sfs-client: hangs with linux >= 2.6.22
to be marked as done.
This m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 512713 http://code.google.com/p/chmsee/issues/detail?id=16
Bug#512713: chmsee: segfaults with some files
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://code.google.com/p/chmsee/issues/detail?id=16.
>
End of message, stoppin
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> With the same file _index.chm from S60 Nokia SDK I can reproduce this crash:
>
please send _index.chm to my email: lidaob...@gmail.com
this patch is not perfect(consider a node with null data, but with
children, the children will be ignor
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:56:39 +0100
with message-id <200901281056.45245.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#513321: roundcube: Send mail button disabled with
latest package update
has caused the Debian Bug report #513321,
regarding roundcube: Send mail button disabled
Yup
i am travelling a lot these days. I may not be able to make the upload
before next week
let me know if that's ok with you
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>>> Yep. But the build you attached actually builds the pac
OK, thanks to the help of Lorenzo Catucci, I was able to pinpoint one
problem that can cause a race. I will write up the details soon, but
this requires some time ;) I think I have a fix for the debian_lenny
branch, you can pull it from git and also find it on its gitweb:
http://git.adiscon.com/?p
Sorry, there was a copy&paste error in the commit. It is corrected now.
Please pull the latest version from that git branch.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:rgerha...@hq.adiscon.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 1:00 PM
> To: Michael Biebl
> Cc: Juha Koho; 509.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:33:08PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:44:09AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the
> > problem?
> >
> > patch /etc/grub.d/10_linux.in 10_linux.diff
> > update-gru
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about what's needed/expected here.
For the lenny release we can only expect to fix RC bugs at this time.
This means the copyright/licensing fix, and possibly taking the most
critical stuff from 1.4.3 and incorporating it.
I can't ask for all of 1.4.3 to be included because
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 5:39 PM, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>> With the same file _index.chm from S60 Nokia SDK I can reproduce this crash:
>>
> please send _index.chm to my email: lidaob...@gmail.com
>
> this patch is not perfect(consider a
Package: wide-dhcpv6-client
Version: 20080615-1lenny1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
In lenny, version 20080615-1lenny1 runs through debconf and generates a config
file, but dpkg --configure output goes thus:
=
Setting up wide-dhcpv6-client (20080615-1lenny1) ...
Star
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package wide-dhcpv6-client
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wide-dhcpv6-client
> found 513375 20080615-4
Bug#513375: wide-dhcpv6-client: fails to install properly
Bug marked as found in version 20080615-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
* dann frazier [2009-01-28 12:49]:
> Package: grub-pc
> Version: 1.96+20080724-14
> Severity: grave
>
> hey,
> After a recent upgrade, my laptop became unbootable. I don't have
> local access to the machine rigth now, so unfortunately the preboot
> information will have to come from memory.
>
>
Cyril Brulebois (28/01/2009):
> I'll follow up in a few hours with a proposed patch, and an NMU short
> afterwards, thus tagging pending.
NMU just uploaded, using the attached patch.
Mraw,
KiBi.
diff -u guile-1.6-1.6.8/debian/rules guile-1.6-1.6.8/debian/rules
--- guile-1.6-1.6.8/debian/rules
++
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:17:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#510998: fixed in libgeda 1:1.4.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #510998,
regarding libgeda: Incorrect licensing terms in copyright file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:47:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#510999: fixed in geda-symbols 1:1.4.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #510999,
regarding geda-symbols: Incorrect licensing terms in copyright file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:32:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#510995: fixed in geda-gnetlist 1:1.4.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #510995,
regarding geda-gnetlist: Incorrect licensing terms in copyright file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:47:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#510993: fixed in geda-doc 1:1.4.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #510993,
regarding geda-doc: Incorrect licensing terms in copyright file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:32:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#510997: fixed in geda-gsymcheck 1:1.4.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #510997,
regarding geda-gsymcheck: Incorrect licensing terms in copyright file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:32:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#510996: fixed in geda-gschem 1:1.4.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #510996,
regarding geda-gschem: Incorrect licensing terms in copyright file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:47:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#510992: fixed in geda 1:1.4.0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #510992,
regarding geda: Incorrect licensing terms in copyright file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:47:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#511000: fixed in geda-utils 1:1.4.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #511000,
regarding geda-utils: Incorrect licensing terms in copyright file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:32:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#497740: fixed in guile-1.6 1.6.8-6.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #497740,
regarding guile-1.6_1.6.8-6.2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS on hppa with gcc-4.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags #513222 moreinfo
Bug#513222: fglrx-driver: crashes Xorg
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.5.99.901-2
Severity: serious
The X server crashed with the following trace:
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X(xorg_backtrace+0x26) [0x4ee016]
1: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x39) [0x483109]
2: /lib/libc.so.6 [0x7fc244364f60]
3: /usr/bin/X(CopyKeyClass+0x75) [0x53ac05]
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 13:40, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I will upload fixes for the licensing bug tonight.
OK, thanks.
I'll check on it tomorrow and NMU if need be.
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:47:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#510994: fixed in geda-examples 1:1.4.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #510994,
regarding geda-examples: Incorrect licensing terms in copyright file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 513384 upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#513384: xserver-xorg-core: server crash in CopyKeyClass when pressing
special keys
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream
> forwarded 513384 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?i
Package: openoffice.org-dmaths
Version: 3.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
No matter where I click, dmaths only produces BASIC runtime errors within
openoffice.org (e.g. when clicking anywhere on the dmaths toolbar, or when
clicking on help, FAQ, etc. within dmaths-men
Package: synaptic
Version: 0.62.5
Tags: confirmed
Followup-For: Bug #495228
I just tested this by forcibly removing hicolor-icon-theme, and can confirm
that synaptic is drastically less usable under that condition.
I hate to raise something to RC with the hopes of a release soon, but this
could
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 512625 serious
Bug#512625: davfs2: cannot mount davfs: double free or corruption (!prev) error
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> tag 512625 lenny
Bug#512625: davfs2: cannot mount davfs: double free or corruption (!prev) error
Tag
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Christophe Prud'homme
wrote:
> Yup
>
> i am travelling a lot these days. I may not be able to make the upload
> before next week
>
> let me know if that's ok with you
No, that is not ok. :) So I'll make the upload, but what should I do
about the svn, which already
Hi,
Given #495683 is months old, and the maintainer hasn't commented on it, and
it's never been in a stable release, should it just get removed from
testing?
regards
Andrew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:47:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#512625: fixed in davfs2 1.3.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #512625,
regarding davfs2: cannot mount davfs: double free or corruption (!prev) error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:17:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#513375: fixed in wide-dhcpv6 20080615-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #513375,
regarding wide-dhcpv6-client: fails to install properly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:17:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#513158: fixed in moin 1.7.1-3+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #513158,
regarding CVE-2009-0260: Multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:17:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#513375: fixed in wide-dhcpv6 20080615-1lenny2
has caused the Debian Bug report #513375,
regarding wide-dhcpv6-client: fails to install properly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:17:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#513158: fixed in moin 1.8.1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #513158,
regarding CVE-2009-0260: Multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:15:23PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:33:08PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:44:09AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Please could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the
> > > probl
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:46:14 +0100
with message-id <4980a7f6.2050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: libghc6-utf8-string-dev: Fails to install
has caused the Debian Bug report #513302,
regarding libghc6-utf8-string-dev: Fails to install
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.5.99.901-2
Severity: grave
Hi,
here are the steps to reproduce this bug:
1. start an X server (with kdm in my case)
2. hit a "multimedia" key on an USB keyboard, for instance a volume control key
(mute sound, ...)
3. the X server crashes with this backtr
Hello!
I had a really quick look and there seems to be several issues.
Next after parsing the command line options, the server forks and kills
off the parent (in wzdftpd/wzd_main.c line 402). This leaves no room for
returning a proper error/exit code if something in the startup process
fails.
Th
severity 513136 important
thanks
Hi Fernando,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:44:30 -0200 Fernando Toledo wrote:
> Package: xpn
> Version: 1.0.0-3
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
Which one?
> i found some errors when browsing the nntp server
> the test server is nntp://
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 513136 important
Bug#513136: xpn: error message when reading news
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
retitle 507587 CVE-2008-5282,CVE-2008-6005: multiple buffer overflows
thanks
Hi,
The following CVE id was assigned to the issue I reported:
==
Name: CVE-2008-6005
Status: Candidate
URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-6005
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 507587 CVE-2008-5282,CVE-2008-6005: multiple buffer overflows
Bug#507587: CVE-2008-5282: multiple buffer overflows
Changed Bug title to `CVE-2008-5282,CVE-2008-6005: multiple buffer overflows'
from `CVE-2008-5282: multiple buffer overflow
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1
> forwarded 513407 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19574
Bug#513407: xserver-xorg-core: pressing a multimedia key crashes the X server
Noted your statement that
severity 511517 normal
tags 511517 -security
thanks
This should be fixed as a general bug, but upstream points out that
it is w/o security relevance:
http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2009-January/002133.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 511517 normal
Bug#511517: libnasl: Return values of DSA_do_verify
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> tags 511517 -security
Bug#511517: libnasl: Return values of DSA_do_verify
Tags were: security
Tags removed: security
> thanks
St
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 511519 - pending
Bug#511519: libcrypt-openssl-dsa-perl: return values of openssl functions.
Tags were: pending security
Tags removed: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Hi Daniel
This is interesting as it works very well on my systems. On other hand that
system is a 686 based one.
You write that you have not significantly changed your system, but at the
same time you write that you are not sure that it has ever worked with the
2.6.26 kernel.
Can you please elab
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20080724-14
Followup-For: Bug #512787
Perhaps I can help, as I have the same problem and I have not yet run
grub-install.
What I have detected is that I have to delete the search line *before* it is
run.
If I let the system to try to run once, and then I edit boot
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:47:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#513135: fixed in twinkle 1:1.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #513135,
regarding twinkle_1:1.4-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error:
readline/readline.h: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
Th
Hi Kurt,
-=| Kurt Roeckx, Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 08:36:34PM +0100 |=-
> Package: libcrypt-openssl-dsa-perl
> Severity: serious
> Tags: security
>
> I've been checking packages to see if they properly check the return
> value of some of the functions in openssl.
>
> It seems that your package calls
Package: gnumeric
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for gnumeric.
CVE-2009-0318[0]:
| Untrusted search path vulnerability in the GObject Python interpreter
| wrapper in Gnumeric allows local users to execute arbitrary
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:52:18PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > However those functions can also return -1 on failure. This
> > would then mean that other applications making use of this
> > could wrongly check the return value.
>
> Since $dsa->verify(...) croaks in underlying OpenSSL call ret
Package: nautilus-python
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for nautilus-python.
CVE-2009-0317[0]:
| Untrusted search path vulnerability in the Python language bindings
| for Nautilus (nautilus-python) allows local user
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: causes libgsf to no longer build from source; regression
compared to testing's gcc-4.3 packages.
What am I trying to do:
* Build libgsf from source again on amd64 (or build libgsf svn trunk).
How am I trying to do it / steps to re
-=| Kurt Roeckx, Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:12:20PM +0100 |=-
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:52:18PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > > However those functions can also return -1 on failure. This
> > > would then mean that other applications making use of this
> > > could wrongly check the return value.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 512787 important
Bug#512787: upgrade makes system unbootable
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 512787 important
thanks
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:21:20AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > Thanks. That's very annoying, because it makes no sense.
> >
> > It could be that older versions of GRUB couldn't handle this syntax in the
> > parser. Please could you verify that you're running
Hi Harald,
Marcus confirmed [1] that this bug disappeared after upgrading grub-pc.
This seems to indicate it's a duplicate of #512787.
Please could you check if re-running grub-install with 1.96+20080724-14
makes it disappear?
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502333#29
--
# The affected code is part of the python-loader plugin.
reassign 513418 gnumeric-plugins-extra
tags 513418 + upstream
thanks
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 22:59:25 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> The attached patch should fix this problem (but I haven't
> tested it).
Going by http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # The affected code is part of the python-loader plugin.
> reassign 513418 gnumeric-plugins-extra
Bug#513418: gnumeric: CVE-2009-0318 untrusted search path vulnerability in
GObject wrapper
Bug reassigned from package `gnumeric' to `gnumeric-plugi
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 14:18:21 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:59:18AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Anyway, yes, I guess the best option is to not install non-native 10_*
> > scripts, and add support for the Hurd and others into the os-prober one,
> > which should be mor
Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> Sorry, there was a copy&paste error in the commit. It is corrected now.
> Please pull the latest version from that git branch.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:rgerha...@hq.adiscon.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 1:00 PM
>> To: Mi
This ought to be fixable by a binNMU, but linux-modules-contrib-2.6 is
not binNMU-safe. And rebuilding it properly in unstable will add new
binary packages for the vserver flavour. Perhaps a testing-security
upload is in order.
I did at least find the magic runes to add a build-dependency on the
2009/1/28 Miguel Landaeta :
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:16 AM, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
>> check whether this commit fix this bug:
>> http://github.com/lidaobing/chmsee/commit/f9f54e33c7ee211ac54f1734fbc2cd40328fb5bc
>>
>> we also need another patch to process the new index format. so please
>> sti
The new xine with xdg-screensaver prevents xscreensaver from locking
the screen. But it does not prevent the same screen from beeing
blanked (old xine did). I don't think proposed patches in #511248 are
going to fix that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 513420 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR39015
Bug#513420: Breaks building libgsf from source
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR39015.
> tag 513420 + upstream
Bug#513420: Breaks building libgsf from source
Ther
forwarded 513420 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR39015
tag 513420 + upstream
tag 513420 + pending
thanks
preparing 4.3.3-3.
caused by the fix for PR38615. would it be possible to track down the
miscompiled source file and update the upstream report?
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) schrieb:
> Package: gcc-4.3
> Version
Package: duplicity
Version: 0.5.02-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
duplicity 0.5.02-2 has dependency on python << 2.5
This makes it unistallable on any installation having packages which
need python 2.5, one of the most important being reportbug itself.
-- System Inform
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:02:01 +0100
Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Hi Harald,
>
> Marcus confirmed [1] that this bug disappeared after upgrading
> grub-pc. This seems to indicate it's a duplicate of #512787.
But the symptoms in #512787 are completely different. I don't get
complaints about ``initrd''
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:57:37 +0100
Harald Braumann wrote:
> I already tried with 1.96+20080724-14 and also with 1.96+20081201-1
> . Same problem and there's no newer version in Debian.
Sorry, I didn't test with 1.96+20080724-14. I'll try that, though I
have my doubts, that the ``set root'' comman
This is caused by newer kernel headers (in this case on a build system
that was used to build this vzctl package), and is fixed in
vzctl-3.0.23. See the following git commit:
http://git.openvz.org/?p=vzctl;a=commit;h=0d6bfad92c7cb6a193801ce8dac3a0dc64396ca8
So the solution is either to upgrade
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:47:15 +0100, Erwan David writes:
>duplicity 0.5.02-2 has dependency on python << 2.5
i mistakenly built the package on the wrong box (which runs etch)
and will fix this later today.
regards
az
--
+ Alexander Zangerl + DSA 42BD645D + (RSA 5B586291)
If Java had true garbag
Hi Ray,
I've spent a while looking at what runs what, and realised that it
will be quite time consuming for someone not familiar with your
package to extact a test case. Would it be possible for you to
isolate the gsf-scan bit; and provide the arguments and input
files to run it in isolation rath
Hi Kir
I will backport this fix. I thought I already did that. Thanks!
// Ola
Quoting Kir Kolyshkin :
This is caused by newer kernel headers (in this case on a build system
that was used to build this vzctl package), and is fixed in
vzctl-3.0.23. See the following git commit:
http://git.open
81 matches
Mail list logo
