Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> severity 429123 normal
Bug#429123: RM: libapache-mod-iptos -- RoM; obsolete; apache1 only
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
severity 429081 normal
reassign 429081 ftp.debian.org
retitle 429081 RM: libapache-mod-text2html -- RoQA; obsolete
severity 429131 normal
reassign 429131 ftp.debian.org
retitle 429131 RM: libapache-mod-rpaf -- RoQA; obsolete
severity 429099 normal
reassign 429099 ftp.debian.org
retitle 429099 RM: l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 429081 normal
Bug#429081: please update/request removal of your package
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 429081 ftp.debian.org
Bug#429081: please update/request removal of your package
Bug reassigned from package `libapache-m
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:15:14AM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Why is 456898 marked as a blocker for this bug?
> Because in the process of resolving this unrelated bug I believe I got
> hit by the same issue:
> /usr/bin/../lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined reference to `cbla
Package: virtualbox-ose
Version: 1.5.4-dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hi !
When upgrading from 1.5.2 to 1.5.4, virtual hosts cannot be restored
from saved states or snapshots. Since many people may rely on this
functionality to save important data, I think this
Package: bulmages
version: 0.9.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/buil
Package: aqsis
version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080101 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-source: building aqsis in aqsis_1.2.0-2.dsc
> d
Package: llvm
version: 1.8b-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> /build/user/llvm-1.8b/llvm-gcc4-1.8b-source/build/
Package: octave3.0
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: grave
just try
echo version | octave
or
octave
on an arm machine:
$ uname -a
Linux arm 2.6.18-4-versatile #1 Sun Jun 17 14:34:28 UTC 2007 armv5tejl GNU/Linux
$ octave
GNU Octave, version 3.0.0
Copyright (C) 2007 John W. Eaton and others.
This
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 08:27 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> Package: boo
> Version: 0.8.0.2730-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
> boo 0.8.0 breaks ABI compared to the older versions and depending
> packages, like banshee, fail to load the boo assemblies after an
> upgrade.
>
> Please package the runt
Package: supercollider
version: 20060416-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules cl
Package: lib32bz2-1.0
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -c
/org/ftp.root/debian/pool/main/b/bzip2/lib32bz2-1.0_1.0.4-1_amd64.deb |grep
/lib32/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-12-23 05:31 ./usr/lib32/
-rw-r--r-- root/root 66276 2007-12-23 05:31 ./usr/lib32/libbz
Not only does mime-support add a (buggy) alternative for view in
postinst, but it doesn't remove it in prerm. Please fix this by
removing the alternative in postinst on upgrades from 3.40-1.
Thanks,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Just for reference, testing the build of 0.8.5-1 on powerpc in Ubuntu
hardy worked (whereas 0.8.1-1 had failed, with similar symptoms to
those reported in this bug). It may be worth testing 0.8.5-1 against
a Debian powerpc build environment to see if this bug is still
present.
--
Emmet HIKORY
Under current circumstances at least, losing Adobe Flash Player from a
Debian desktop system is a big deal because of the loss of YouTube
because, as I understand it, the free Flash players don't work with
YouTube.
Hi. YouTube already works with Gnash the free Flash player, so that in
particula
Hi,
I've run into the bug again a few times, but most recently on a rather
inconspicuous bit - just scrolling within one single message crashed rxvt.
Because this message wasn't signed or anything, so not that many colors
would be involved in the crash, I then also took a wild guess and reduced
t
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:21:23PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I've run into the bug again a few times, but most recently on a rather
> inconspicuous bit - just scrolling within one single message crashed rxvt.
>
> Because this message wasn't signed or anything, so not that many colors
> would be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 457402 by 457589
Bug#457589: sdcc should be in main
Bug#457402: gnuradio: Build-Depends on non-free package sdcc
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 457402 added: 457589
> severity 457402 serious
Bug#457402: gnuradio: Build-Depends on n
block 457402 by 457589
severity 457402 serious
thanks
On 23/12/07 at 12:08 -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> severity 457402 normal
> tags 457402 +wontfix
> thanks
>
> I believe the move of sdcc to non-free was in error, and in particular the
> component of sdcc upon which gnuradio build-depends is a
Hi. Can you still reproduce this bug? I couldn't reproduce it, trying
both Debian unstable and Debian 4.0 with the 3.0.0~beta2-4 filezilla
packages installed in both (on 4.0, installed from unstable). In the
latter case, I had the same libwx* versions as you had.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Hi Lucas
Bdale has come up with a nice idea on how to fix this issue and I
will do it in the next few days. Then I will finish comedi as well :)
Cheers
Gudjon
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:19:12PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> block 457402 by 457589
> severity 457402 serious
> thanks
>
> On 23
Package: gfpoken
version: 0.30-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> checking whether we are cross compiling...
Package: bmpx
version: 0.40.11+debian-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> if x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Package: haskell-http
version: 30010004-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> Warning: Network.HTTP: the follow
Package: python-qt4
version: 4.3.3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -Wl,--no-undefined -shared -Wl,--vers
Package: asterisk
version: 1:1.4.16.2~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies suppl
Package: tau
version: 2.16.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> dh_testdir
> ./configure -prefix=/build/us
Package: jaxme
version: 0.5.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> [junit] Runn
Package: debian-edu-doc
version: 0.9.20071204
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-source: building debian-edu-
Package: libopensync-plugin-gpe
Version: 0.35-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Hi,
Your package build-depends on libopensync1exp2-dev, which is only
available in experimental. Maybe you mistakenly uploaded it to unstable?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
Package: packagesearch
version: 2.2.6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -Wl,--no-undefined -shared
Package: xindy
version: 2.2~beta2-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/xi
Package: haskell-uulib
version: 0.9.3~snapshot20071230-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> <> <+>
Package: fassets
version: 260.72-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary
>
Package: ktoon
version: 0.8.1-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -Wl,--no-undefined -shared -Wl,-son
Package: gauche-gtk
version: 0.4.1-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/u
Package: axiom
version: 20050901-10
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> compiling ODERTRIC.spad to ODERTRIC.NR
Package: mimms
version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-source: building mimms in mimms_2.0.1-1.
Hi,
Thanks for reporting this. However, I don't understand what's wrong. I
hope you have some of the logs from the build process, or can regenerate
them (in particular config.log).
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:11:22PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > checking for imlib-config... /usr/bin/imlib-c
On 3 January 2008 at 13:10, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| Package: fassets
| version: 260.72-1
| Severity: serious
| User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
| Justification: FTBFS on amd64
|
| Hi,
|
| During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:28:29PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: libopensync-plugin-gpe
> Version: 0.35-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package build-depends on libopensync1exp2-dev, w
On 03/01/08 at 06:45 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 3 January 2008 at 13:10, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> | Package: fassets
> | version: 260.72-1
> | Severity: serious
> | User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
> | Justification: FT
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:32:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458638: fixed in mu-cade 0.11.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:32:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458638: fixed in mu-cade 0.11.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On 03/01/08 at 14:04 +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for reporting this. However, I don't understand what's wrong. I
> hope you have some of the logs from the build process, or can regenerate
> them (in particular config.log).
>
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:11:22PM +0100, Lucas Nussba
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458637: fixed in titanion 0.3.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:32:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458282: fixed in mu-cade 0.11.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458283: fixed in titanion 0.3.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:32:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458282: fixed in mu-cade 0.11.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458637: fixed in titanion 0.3.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458283: fixed in titanion 0.3.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458280: fixed in tumiki-fighters 0.2.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458280: fixed in tumiki-fighters 0.2.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
r: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > | Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
> > | Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> > |
> > | Hi,
> > |
> > | During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > amd64.
> > |
> > | Releva
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458642: fixed in torus-trooper 0.22.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458279: fixed in torus-trooper 0.22.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
severity 429127 normal
reassign 429127 ftp.debian.org
retitle 429127 RM: libapache-mod-mp3 -- RoQA; obsolete
thanks
On 03/01/08 at 14:12 +0100, Andreas Wenning wrote:
> Hi Lucas
>
> You missed one package:
> libapache-mod-mp3
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=429127
Indeed. done.
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458642: fixed in torus-trooper 0.22.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458633: fixed in tumiki-fighters 0.2.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 458884 by 458558
Bug#458558: libqt4-dev: qmake adds --no-undefined to Makefile for LIB template
- causes linker errors
Bug#458884: packagesearch: FTBFS: aptplugincontainer.cpp:(.text+0xb1):
undefined reference to `NPlugin::BasePluginContainer::~
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 458844 grave
Bug#458844: f-spot: Extensions broken
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> reassign 458844 libflickrnet2.1.5-cil
Bug#458844: f-spot: Extensions broken
Bug reassigned from package `f-spot' to `libflickrnet2.1.5-cil'.
> retitle
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458633: fixed in tumiki-fighters 0.2.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 429127 normal
Bug#429127: please update/request removal of your package
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 429127 ftp.debian.org
Bug#429127: please update/request removal of your package
Bug reassigned from package `libapache-m
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458279: fixed in torus-trooper 0.22.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 229700 serious
Bug#229700: lprfax: Should use Debconf for its configuration
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> tags 229700 + patch
Bug#229700: lprfax: Should use Debconf for its configuration
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 12:19 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> In #457589, the maintainer of sdcc said that he thinks that sdcc really
> belongs to non-free. Until this is clarified, I'm setting the severity
> back to serious, and marking this bug as blocked by #457589.
Sadly, most of the discussion
Package: wound-up
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: triggers system hang via bugginess elsewhere
woundup, by default, tries to open a window covering the entire desktop
(2560x1024), and doesn't get much further before reliably causing a system
hang. (I recognise that the hang isn't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 458666 pending
Bug#458666: hdbc-postgresql: FTBFS: ./setup build files: 256 at
/usr/share/haskell-devscripts//Dh_Haskell.pm line 145, line 1.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 458900 normal
Bug#458900: wound-up: doesn't understand multiple monitors
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Hello
Le Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:56:37 -0700,
Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> OK, can you try one more thing? Can you install
> libgnustep-ba/usr/share/GNUstep/Makefiles/filesystem.shse1.14,
> gnustep-base-common, and gnustep-base-runtime from the experimental
> distribution ("deb http:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 458644 pending
Bug#458644: hdbc-odbc: FTBFS: hdbc-odbc-helper.c:1:20: error: HsBase.h: No such
file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 445914 imlib should limit itself to 24-bit to prevent crashes in
Bug#445914: nethack-gnome: fails to run.
Changed Bug title to `imlib should limit itself to 24-bit to prevent crashes
in' from `nethack-gnome: fails to run.'.
> various applicati
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:48:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line amule: not installable in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
tags 458666 pending
thanks
A commit relevant to this bug has occurred.
Revision: 218
Thu Jan 3 09:27:31 CST 2008 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Added build-dep on libhugs-parsec
fixes deb#458666
More details are available at:
http://software.complete.org/hdbc-postgresql/changese
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.2.7-4etch2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
CUPS does not depend on foomatic filters package that is needed to print.
My HP LaserJet could be installed and set-up with config but didnt want to
print, except it blinked LED once.
I got the solutio
severity 458900 normal
thanks
On Thu Jan 03 14:23, Darren Salt wrote:
> woundup, by default, tries to open a window covering the entire desktop
> (2560x1024), and doesn't get much further before reliably causing a system
> hang. (I recognise that the hang isn't really wound-up's fault, but it *is*
tags 458644 pending
thanks
A commit relevant to this bug has occurred.
Revision: 275
Thu Jan 3 09:42:03 CST 2008 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Removed HsBase.h import
fixes deb#458644
More details are available at:
http://software.complete.org/hdbc-odbc/changeset/275
--
To
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458666: fixed in hdbc-postgresql 1.1.3.0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
You may skip my ramblings to find the actual fix, to imlib, in the
bottom. I'm just including some of the stuff I wrote for completeness
sake, and since I spent many hours debugging before finding the actual
problem.
I compiled nethack with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nostrip noopt"
dpkg-buildpackage -rfak
Hi, submitters:
According to the changelog for python2.4,
python2.4 (2.4.4-7) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
* Rename all exported symbols to avoid conflicts with similarly named
symbols in other libraries (Robert Edmonds). Closes: #440272.
[...]
Can you please try to replicate #411487 (
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#448454: fixed in a2ps 1:4.14-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:02:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458644: fixed in hdbc-odbc 1.1.3.1.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
tags 422729 - help
merge 422729 449135
severity 422729 important
reassign 422729 grub-ieee1275
thanks
This does only affect Apple hardware, and I don't consider it RC.
Nevertheless, note that it's being worked on in upstream. I expect there
will be a fix soon.
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 02:23:48PM
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 422729 - help
Bug#422729: [ppc] recent snapshot doesn't work at all and drops me to OF
Tags were: help
Tags removed: help
> merge 422729 449135
Bug#422729: [ppc] recent snapshot doesn't work at all and drops me to OF
Bug#449135: Booting fails with
On 15.09.07 Andreas Putzo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On May 12, Dr. Claudia Neumann wrote:
Hi Claudia,
> > Package: wwwoffle
> > Version: 2.9a-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
This bug actually keeps wwwoffle from migrating into testing
(http://ftp-master.d
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:26:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458334: fixed in kde4libs 4:3.98.0~svn755919-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
On Thu 03 Jan 2008, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> Starting HTTP cache proxy server: wwwoffled
>
>
>
> wwwoffled[12054] Warning: The WWWOFFLE root CA private key file
> 'certificates/root/root-key.pem' does not exist; creating it.
>
> Paul, if this is really the point in time, when wwwoffle creates
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 423646 generating the WWWOFFLE root CA private key file takes ages
> (half an hour)
Bug#423646: wwwoffle: The WWWOFFLE root CA private key file
'certificates/root/root-key.pem' cannot be loaded.
Changed Bug title to `generating the WWWOFFLE ro
Sorry, it totally slipped my mind that I should have cut a release
soon after fixing these. I will do so for tomorrow.
--
things change.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 423646 generating the WWWOFFLE root CA private key file takes ages
(half an hour)
severity 423646 normal
stop
On 03.01.08 Claudia Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Claudia,
> Yes, waiting a long time solved the problem. I don't know any more
> how long it took, but it could have bee
Il giorno 02/gen/08, alle ore 11:49, Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto:
Package: drapes
version: 0.5.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080101 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
build on i386.
[.
Hi. One more thing, I made a fixed package and it's now available at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/imlib/imlib_1.9.15-6.dsc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > Correct, it uses gnustep-make and I pass -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed
> > in the new version of the package.
>
> Ok, so it's not a blocker other than the fact that you've chosen to
> modify the package in a way that it fails to build given the current
> state of the arc
Hi Mirco,
Sorry, I didn't see this bug report.
On Thu, 03 Jan, 2008 at 02:42:00PM +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote:
> severity 458844 grave
> reassign 458844 libflickrnet2.1.5-cil
> retitle 458844 libflickrnet2.1.5-cil: broke ABI (breaking other applications
> like f-spot) and violates the Debian CLI Po
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#450478: fixed in agenda.app 0.28-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> retitle 457062 exiftags: CVE-2007-635{5,6} multiple vulnerabilities
Bug#457062: exiftags: CVE-2007-635{4,5,6} multiple vulnerabilities
Changed Bug title to `exiftags: CVE-2007-635{5,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> retitle 457062 exiftags: CVE-2007-635{4,5,6} multiple vulnerabilities
Bug#457062: exiftags: CVE-2007-635{5,6} multiple vulnerabilities
Changed Bug title to `exiftags: CVE-2007-635{4,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 458318 "Four security issues in vlc"
Bug#458318: Three security issues in vlc
Changed Bug title to `"Four security issues in vlc"' from `Three security
issues in vlc'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
retitle 458318 "Five security issues in vlc"
thanks
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-30 12:56]:
[...]
> According to http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/485488/30/0/threaded ,
> there
> are two more unfixed security issues in vlc:
>
> A] buffer-overflow in the handlin
retitle 458318 "Four security issues in vlc"
thanks
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-30 12:56]:
> http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/2007-December/037726.html
> https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/1371
>
> describe a security issue which allows to write to ar
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
