Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 424029 serious
Bug#424029: portmap: segfault on upgrade (HPPA)
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Package: python-gmpy
Version: 1.01-1
Severity: grave
Hi!
The orig.tar.gz does not have any license text. Please ask upstream to
include a copy of COPYING.LIB and repackage the tarball to include one
in the meantime.
Right now the orig.tar.gz is not redistributable, so this should not
even have p
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:26:20AM +0200, Sébastien Bernard wrote:
>Package: portmap
>Version: 6.0-0
>Followup-For: Bug #424029
Bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/424029
>I identified the problem as a -pie link which seems to be broken.
Thank you!
>The folowing lines explains the problem :
>---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 426952 -security
Bug#426952: iceweasel: CVE-2007-2671 reported may 2007 allows remote attacker
to caus denial of service
Tags were: security
Tags removed: security
> severity 426952 normal
Bug#426952: iceweasel: CVE-2007-2671 reported may 2007 al
I'd like to adopt the mercury (and mercury-docs) packages, unless someone more
qualified wishes to do it.
I've been using Mercury on Debian (i386 and amd64) for some years now, and want
this easily available to other Debian users.
I am not a Mercury developer, but the feedback I've had from th
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426825: fixed in doodle 0.6.6-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: gnome-mount
Version: 0.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
gnome-mount should depend on libeel2-2.18 which is the only version
available in Sid. I forced it's install with dpkg and it seems to work
well.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
Architecture: i3
"Tshepang Lekhonkhobe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: coreutils
> Version: 5.97-5
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/home/wena/temp/coreutils-5.97/build-tree/coreutils-5.97/tests/chgrp'
> /usr/bin/make check-TESTS
> make[4]:
Le Friday 01 June 2007 13:19:04 Rafal Czlonka, vous avez écrit :
> Hi,
> Module builds and installs, but when I try to load it:
> # modprobe ov51x-jpeg
> FATAL: Module ov51x_jpeg not found.
>
> The module is build using module-assistant if that makes any difference.
Did you actually *installed* th
tags 426952 -security
severity 426952 normal
thanks
Browser crashes triggered from parsing HTML are not treated as security
problems, but as regular bugs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426818: fixed in rus-ispell 0.99g4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: ov51x-jpeg-source
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
Module builds and installs, but when I try to load it:
# modprobe ov51x-jpeg
FATAL: Module ov51x_jpeg not found.
The module is build using module-assistant if that makes any difference.
Regards,
rjc
-- System Information:
Debian Re
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420174: fixed in fglrx-driver 8.37.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420174: fixed in fglrx-driver 8.37.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420174: fixed in fglrx-driver 8.37.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420174: fixed in fglrx-driver 8.37.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420174: fixed in fglrx-driver 8.37.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Le Friday 01 June 2007 14:08:27, vous avez écrit :
> Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > Did you actually *installed* the generated module ?
>
> Yes I did install (not installed) it. Who do you take me for?
Sorry for previous question, but I needed to ask...
> The only module in the package which got build
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426960: fixed in bitstormlite 0.2k-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420174: fixed in fglrx-driver 8.37.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:39:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426904: coreutils: FTBFS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:43:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427010: uninstallable due to missing libeel2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
tags 427021 unreproducible moreinfo
severity 427021 important
thanks
Hi !
Tagging and downgrading the bug until it can be reproduced and confirmed..
Romain
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 427021 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#427021: FATAL: Module ov51x_jpeg not found.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> severity 427021 important
Bug#427021: FATAL: Module ov51x_jpeg not found.
Severity set to `important' fro
Package: libapache2-mod-fcgid
Version: 1:2.1-1
Severity: critical
After upgrading libapache2-mod-fcgid from 1:1.10-2 to 1:2.1-1 apache2
throws a floating point exception upon attempting to start.
This is what the init.d script returns on run:
Starting web server (apache2).../usr/sbin/apache2c
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426019: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425552: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425564: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425550: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425727: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425438: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425479: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # affets buildds
> severity 427032 serious
Bug#427032: texlive-latex-base: No graphics driver defined.
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Package: lighttpd
Followup-For: Bug #422254
Hi,
This bug doesn't look harmless. What is the reason it hasn't been fixed yet?
Olaf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425390: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425559: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425438: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425672: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425476: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425476: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426844: fixed in firebird1.5 1.5.4.4910rel-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:04:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug resolved by fixed libzipios
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On 01.06.07 Bruce MacDonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> After installing the updated package, latex'ing a document that
> uses the graphics package results in a complaint that there is no
> default driver. This can be fixed by creating
> /etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/graphics.cfg with the line
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426859: fixed in firebird2.0 2.0.1.12855.ds1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> I decided to give pitivi a try tonight, and it resulted in:
>
> % pitivi
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pitivi", line 85, in ?
> _init_gobject_gtk_gst()
> File "/usr/bin/pitivi", line 57, in _init_gobject_gtk_gst
> imp
clone 427032 -1
retitle -1 config.ps is missing
reassign -1 texlive-base-bin
severity -1 important
thanks
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To make the postinst scripts work again, we have forcibly resurrected
> modes.mf and pdftexconfig.tex. I wasn't aware that graphics.cfg is
> mandato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 427032 -1
Bug#427032: texlive-latex-base: No graphics driver defined.
Bug 427032 cloned as bug 427059.
> retitle -1 config.ps is missing
Bug#427059: texlive-latex-base: No graphics driver defined.
Changed Bug title to `config.ps is missing' from
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:48:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425738: madwifi: several DOS-able holes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi,
>>> In Message "Bug#427046: libapache2-mod-fcgid upgrade to 1:2.1-1 breaks
>>> apache2"
>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>> Andrew Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said;
> Package: libapache2-mod-fcgid
> Version: 1:2.1-1
> Severity: critical
> Starting web server (apache2).../usr/sbin/apache2c
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we should reintroduce graphics.cfg, too, but I'm unsure about
> the rest.
Here's the rest (I upgraded from etch/texlive-full/debiandoc-sgml (with
tetex-base "rc") to sid, purged tetex-base and readded pdftexconfig.tex
and modes.mf):
-/etc/texmf/d
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:33:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424032: FTBFS (broken build-dependencies)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:31:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423979: libgtkhtml3.8-15: experimental version not
installable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:15:24AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > E: Couldn't find package python-numarray-dbg
There are few python packages that suddenly started to build depend on
"-dbg" packages. And I fail to see why you would want to have the debug
symbols when building those packages.
Ku
Hi,
I have fixed the bug you documented in debian/copyright and will be
closing your report.
The author of gpsbabel does not believe there is an issue here, and your
bug report did not document why you believe the coldsync license to be
incompatible with the GPL. I will not attempt to guess as t
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421769: fixed in gpsbabel 1.3.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 426425 important
Bug#426425: sa-exim: sa-exim does not depend on a recent enough version of exim
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tags 421769 pending
thanks
A commit relevant to this bug has occurred.
Revision: b40c0698c8d1310bc876082453d1d41e0fe818a7
changeset: 38:b40c0698c8d1310bc876082453d1d41e0fe818a7
user:John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
date:Fri Jun 01 02:41:13 2007 -0500
description:
Fixed typo i
severity 426425 important
thanks
On Monday 28 May 2007 19:49, Shalon Wood wrote:
> When I upgraded my system yesterday, mail broke. After investigation, it
> turned out that sa-exim had been upgraded, but exim4 had not. The new
> version of sa-exim used the local_scan() version 1.1 ABI, but the ol
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 421769 pending
Bug#421769: gpsbabel: links with or includes GPL-incompatible code
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 391003 + help
Bug#391003: talksoup.app: uninstallable, needs updated build-depends
Tags were: sid
Tags added: help
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 399758 + help
Bug#399758: antigravitaattori: does not start
Tags were: patch
Tags added: help
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 399758 + unreproducible
Bug#399758: antigravitaattori: does not start
Tags were: help patch
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
Package: libxul-dev
Version: 1.8.1.4-1
Severity: grave
xulrunner-config --cflags broken for components:
while js component can now be properly queried:
$ xulrunner-config --cflags js
-I/usr/include/mozjs -I/usr/include/nspr
other (non-special case) components fail:
$ xulrunner-config --cflag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 375518 + help
Bug#375518: cenon.app: Critical error executing Cenon
Tags were: patch confirmed
Tags added: help
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:49:17PM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: libxul-dev
> Version: 1.8.1.4-1
> Severity: grave
>
>
> xulrunner-config --cflags broken for components:
>
> while js component can now be properly queried:
>
> $ xulrunner-config --cflags js
> -I/us
reopen 421769
found 421769 1.3.3-1
thanks
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:39:02 -0500 John Goerzen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have fixed the bug you documented in debian/copyright and will be
> closing your report.
>
> The author of gpsbabel does not believe there is an issue here, and
> your bug report did not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 421769
Bug#421769: gpsbabel: links with or includes GPL-incompatible code
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> foun
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:04:36PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:49:17PM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Package: libxul-dev
> > Version: 1.8.1.4-1
> > Severity: grave
> >
> >
> > xulrunner-config --cflags broken for components:
> >
> > while js c
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:18:46PM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:04:36PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:49:17PM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Package: libxul-dev
> > > Version: 1.8.1.4-1
> > > S
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:18:56PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > The author of gpsbabel does not believe there is an issue here, and
> > your bug report did not document why you believe the coldsync license
> > to be incompatible with the GPL.
>
> It's claimed to be the (original) Artistic Lice
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:26:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:18:46PM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:04:36PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:49:17PM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL
> > > PROTEC
tags 427079 + patch
thanks
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:26:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I put 2 %includedir%'s in one line...
>
> As a workaround, I'd suggest you to use pkg-config instead.
>
> I won't fix this bug before taking care of stable security updates.
patch replacement attached.
Y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 427079 + patch
Bug#427079: xulrunner-config --cflags MODULES broken
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
> The orig.tar.gz does not have any license text. Please ask upstream to
> include a copy of COPYING.LIB
python-gmpy-1.01/setup.py line 31:
'License :: OSI Approved :: GNU Library or Lesser General Public License (LGPL)'
pysymbolicext.c is copyrighted by different person but also under LGPL
Mar
Hi Piotr,
Piotr Ożarowski [2007-06-01 22:39 +0200]:
> 'License :: OSI Approved :: GNU Library or Lesser General Public License
> (LGPL)'
That is a pointer to a license, but you need to ship the entire
license (file COPYING.LIB).
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.d
> Piotr Ożarowski [2007-06-01 22:39 +0200]:
> > 'License :: OSI Approved :: GNU Library or Lesser General Public License
> > (LGPL)'
>
> That is a pointer to a license, but you need to ship the entire
> license (file COPYING.LIB).
debian/copyright file points to /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL,
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:15:24AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > E: Couldn't find package python-numarray-dbg
>
> And I fail to see why you would want to have the debug
> symbols when building those packages.
the packages do build the extensions for the python-dbg interp
reassign 419742 quantlib-swig
found 419742 0.3.14-1
thanks
Dirk,
This reassignment of an RC bug to the toolchain has blocked all of lenny for
another day, because it happened right when glibc was ready to enter
testing. Please consider when reassigning bugs to the toolchain whether
these bugs ar
You fixed it up for amd64 - what about the rest of us?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 419742 quantlib-swig
Bug#419742: quantlib-swig: FTBFS on mips/mipsel due to relocation error
Bug reassigned from package `binutils' to `quantlib-swig'.
> found 419742 0.3.14-1
Bug#419742: quantlib-swig: FTBFS on mips/mipsel due to relocation e
On 1 June 2007 at 15:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
| reassign 419742 quantlib-swig
| found 419742 0.3.14-1
| thanks
|
| Dirk,
|
| This reassignment of an RC bug to the toolchain has blocked all of lenny for
| another day, because it happened right when glibc was ready to enter
| testing. Please con
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:52:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:14:29PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You fixed it up for amd64 - what about the rest of us?
>
Be patient ... let the buildd finish :).
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack| : :' : The unive
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426370: fixed in cl-portable-aserve
1.2.42+cvs.2007.05.07-dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425436: fixed in slime 1:20070409-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:25:01PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | I'm reassigning this bug back to quantlib-swig, because this *is* the
> | package with the RC bug; as Thiemo noted, the build failure happens as a
> | consequence of the special-case use of -O0 on mips* in the package's build
>
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419742: fixed in quantlib-swig 0.8.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> reassign 414535 sun-java6-bin
Bug#414535: sun-java6-jre: Java GUI programs don't work because "Assertion
`c->xlib.lock' failed."
Bug reassigned from package `sun-java6-jre' to `sun-j
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:17:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422628: fixed in haskell-anydbm 1.0.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> # Will break with any graphical program as soon as libx11-6 hits unstable
> severity 402165 grave
Bug#402165: sun-java5-bin: Broken locking causes assertion failure with
Xlib/XCB whe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package l2tpd
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: l2tpd
> tags 393381 + confirmed pending
Bug#393381: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags added: confirmed, pending
> tags 402660 + confirmed pending
Bug#402660: l2tpd
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:20:23PM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> + component_includes="$component_includes -I%includedir% \
> + -I%includedir%/$n"
I think it might be better to end the quote before the end of line and
reopen it a
Josh Triplett schrieb:
> Would the Debian maintainers of sun-java5-bin and sun-java6-bin please
> consider applying these workarounds to the packages, to avoid locking
> assertion failures when libx11-6 with Xlib/XCB enters unstable?
sorry, we are only allowed to distribute the unmodified package.
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:45:58PM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:26:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:18:46PM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:04:36PM +0200, Mike Homme
> I need to add dependency field for new libc6.
Rather, since your package contains dynamically-linked ELF objects, you
should be using ${shlibs:Depends} in your control file.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
95 matches
Mail list logo
