On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:11:37AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 23:42, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It would be equally valid to say that aoetools does not support
> > automounting, and therefore /usr/sbin is appropriate.
> So you're saying that a person that has an aoe
Package: libselinux1-dev
Version: 1.30.27-3
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log of e2fsprogs:
...
CC prof_err.c
LD e2fsck.shared
CP e2fsck
LD e2fsck.static
/usr/lib/libselinux.a(setrans_client.o): In function
`fini_context_translations':
/home/srivasta/li
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:35:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388336: Uninstallable due to libgcj7 -> libgcj7-0
transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:35:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388336: Uninstallable due to libgcj7 -> libgcj7-0
transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:35:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388336: Uninstallable due to libgcj7 -> libgcj7-0
transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Package: kdemultimedia-kio-plugins
Version: 4:3.5.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
The default command line configuration, or any modification of it
accessible through kcontrol interface, will spawn lame with the -x
option.
This results in mp3 files containing almost
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 388215 - upstream
Bug#388215: fails to install without root user profile/Setup.xcu
Tags were: upstream
Tags removed: upstream
> notforwarded 388215
Bug#388215: fails to install
severity 388382 normal
thanks
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 09:58:20AM +0200, Alberto Marmodoro wrote:
> Package: kdemultimedia-kio-plugins
> Version: 4:3.5.4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
This is not data loss; I assure you, ripping CDs is a non-destructive
operatio
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:01:51PM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Thanks for the help. Can you send me your patch with the memmove()'s and
> I'll have a look at it?
The attached patch makes tinysnmpd survive a full snmpwalk on sparc. As I
said, I don't think this is the correct fix, since noth
# Fixed in r306 by kink
tag 388331 + pending
thanks
These bugs are fixed in revision 306 by kink
Log message:
* Fix postrm scripts to work when debconf is not present anymore
(Closes: #388331).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Fixed in r306 by kink
> tag 388331 + pending
Bug#388331: phpbb2: purging the package try to use debconf which was already
removed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:21:07 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS: "Failed to link Mesa source tree" fixed in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On 19.09.06 Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> I'm seeing the same errors on my sparc64 (log file looks the same
> too).
>
Relevant log message seems to be:
(/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
! LaTeX must be made using an initex with no format preloaded.
l.78 ... using an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388382 normal
Bug#388382: kdemultimedia-kio-plugins: wrong lame encoding option results in
static-like files copying audio CD via konqueror
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 02:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388331: fixed in phpbb2 2.0.21-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: tex-common
Version: 0.28
Severity: serious
Hi,
The latest version (0.29) of tex-common fails to be installed here:
Preparing to replace tex-common 0.28 (using .../tex-common_0.29_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement tex-common ...
dpkg: error processing
/debian/debian/pool/main/t/tex-com
Package: zabbix-frontend-php
Version: 1:1.1.2-1
Severity: critical
We have problems with the login page which prevent the whole front-end
to works. I'm filing this bug report in order to prevent this version of
the package to migrate to testing.
--
Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Has a rebuild happened? The "libpisock8" wasn't there before. Is that
a new problem?
apt-get install evolution
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are usi
Hi
I experience the same problem on amd64. To answer your question:
> The other errors just seems to be subsequent.
> 1. Which version of jadetex package do you use?
iU jadetex3.13-7
> 2. What gives you "ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d"?
# ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d
i
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:00 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
>
> Relevant log message seems to be:
>
> (/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
> ! LaTeX must be made using an initex with no format preloaded.
> l.78 ... using an initex with no format preloaded}
This happens after fmtutil ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 388410 grave
Bug#388410: Zabbix PHP front-end doesn't allow to login
Severity set to `grave' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 11:00, you wrote:
> 1. Which version of jadetex package do you use?
iU jadetex 3.13-7
Previously installed version is: 3.13-6
> 2. What gives you "ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d"?
$ ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d
total 28
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1364 Oct 31 2005 00tex.c
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:48:04AM +0200, =?UTF-8?Q? =C3=98yvind?= Harboe wrote:
> Has a rebuild happened?
For most architectures.
> The "libpisock8" wasn't there before. Is that a new problem?
It's bug #341172, now marked as 'serious'.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 354622 serious
Bug#354622: Using Firefox as the app name without official branding is still a
trademark violation
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian b
James Andrewartha wrote:
As for your straw man about security bugs, what security bugs would
you be fixing with your own patches? If there are security bugs,
they should be fixed upstream, not in your own tree. We've had this
discussion repeatedly in the context of the security group, and we
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:56:05AM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:00 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> >
> > Relevant log message seems to be:
> >
> > (/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
> > ! LaTeX must be made using an initex with no format preloaded.
> > l.78
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reopen 388142
Bug#388142: libgalago1: uninstallable, needs rebuilt against libdbus-1-3
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:19:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libgalago2 available in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
As for your straw man about security bugs, what security bugs would you
be fixing with your own patches? If there are security bugs, they
should be fixed upstream, not in your own tree. We've had this
discussion repeatedly in the context of the security group, and we
expect that branded build
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388149: fixed in firefox-sage 1.3.6-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Steve Langasek wrote:
Are the Debian logos and trademarks free?
No, the Debian logos are not free. This is considered a bug.
Since there's no way of making the logo free without losing control over
the mark, why not adopt a generic branding switch like we did? Its
non-trivial to do
Hello,
I looked at the result of the build-binary-clean cycle.
The files removed are automatically generated files.
I this raised the question on debian-qa and the opinion there seemed
to be that the "clean" target not be faulted for removing such files.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-q
I solved this bug by doing:
debian:~# mkdir /usr/share/ggz/modules/ggz-txt-client
debian:~# apt-get -f install
Who can tell me how to run postinst or prem scripts by hand? Maybe I can
find the solution by myself next time :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
hey ralf,
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 11:56 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> However, Frans and Sean, please answer these questions:
>
> > The other errors just seems to be subsequent.
> > 1. Which version of jadetex package do you use?
> > 2. What gives you "ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d"?
> > 3. Please send u
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 348729 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#348729: strange interaction with my network settings at work
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
tags 348729 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Hello,
To use a phrase from the the old adventure game.
The door closing time is approaching ...
As indicated by the maintainer the original submitters
have not indicated that the bug is reproduced with the
newer versions (post 0.8) of zeroco
reassign 388407 latex-ucs-doc
stop
On 20.09.06 Samuel Mimram ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
> The latest version (0.29) of tex-common fails to be installed here:
>
> Preparing to replace tex-common 0.28 (using .../tex-common_0.29_all.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement tex-common ...
> dpkg: e
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382842: fixed in alsaplayer 0.99.76-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
tags 388026 patch
thanks
Since this is a regression introduced in an NMU, I'm skipping over the
waiting period and uploading a fix directly to incoming. The patch for this
is attached.
With this patch, the package is again no longer binNMU-safe. There are ways
to construct a binNMU-safe dep fro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 388026 patch
Bug#388026: libgnome-java - FTBFS: error: Package requirements (gtk2-java >=
2.8) were not met.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Package: libpam-modules
Version: 0.79-3.2
Severity: critical
Module pam_limits.so blindly sets almost all available limits to
the unlimited value, including RLIMIT_NICE and RLIMIT_RTPRIO that should
be set to zero instead (this is also kernel's default). This gives all
users unlimited access t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388407 latex-ucs-doc
Bug#388407: tex-common: Trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf/doc'
Bug reassigned from package `tex-common' to `latex-ucs-doc'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 388026 + fixed
Bug#388026: libgnome-java - FTBFS: error: Package requirements (gtk2-java >=
2.8) were not met.
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388410 normal
Bug#388410: Zabbix PHP front-end doesn't allow to login
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 388410 normal
thanks
hi,
this is an bug in the database SQL script, see:
http://www.zabbix.com/forum/showpost.php?p=13899&postcount=6
it does only occur if http://localhost/zabbix/ is used to access the
zabbix page, http://127.0.0.1/zabbix/ or some other ip/hostname will
still work. F
package ftp.debian.org
block 382907 with 370436
block 384179 with 370436
block 378751 with 370436
block 378752 with 370436
severity 382907 normal
thanks mate
Hi,
As Jeroen pointed out in #370436 a while ago, mozilla won't be removed from
the archive until a suitable replacement (i.e. seamonkey) i
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388124: fixed in findimagedupes 0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388139: fixed in findimagedupes 0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package ftp.debian.org
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ftp.debian.org
> block 382907 with 370436
Bug#382907: RM: mozilla-locale-fr -- RoM; RC-buggy
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 382907 added: 370436, 382956
> block 384179 with 370436
Bu
Upon further investigation, I think that /dev/MAKEDEV is SUPPOSED to be
there! Please look at the thread for bug 387995. Run the following
command to put the symlink back in /dev/
apt-get --reinstall install makedev
Marc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Package: mail-notification
Version: 3.0.dfsg.1-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
launching 'mail-notification' from a terminal gives the following error:
mail-notification: error while loading shared libraries: liblinc.so.1:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or d
Package: mgp
Version: 1.11b-7
Severity: grave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>mgp presentation.mgp
libm17n-X.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Segmentation fault
I am using png graphics within the presentation, but I don't know if
it's related.
I just rebuilt mgp with pbuilder and
Package: tomcat5.5
Version: 5.5.17-1
Severity: serious
Just for complete clarity: Bug #358575 "mailman deletes all
ucf-managed files on purge" is present in version 2.1.5-8sarge3 _only_
for architecture i386. All other architectures (including source) have
the fix in 2.1.5-8sarge3. People running mailman on sarge on i386 are
recommended to recompile th
Subject: update-manager dies with a segmentation fault.
Package: update-manager
Version: 0.42.2ubuntu22-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
After starting update-manager, it shows a dialog with title 'Examining
your
system' and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 380136 patch
Bug#380136: lucene: FTBFS: can not find stubs for class: class
org.apache.lucene.search.RemoteSearchable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks for stopping processing here
Unknown command or malformed arguments to comman
tags 388451 unreproducible moreinfo
thx!
--
Hi Claudio,
i'm quite surprised by your bugreport.
Executing "ldd /usr/bin/mail-notification" shows no dynamic linking
against that librairy neither on i386 nor amd64.
Can you try this on your side?
-Pascal
PS: obviously, i'm unable to reproduce
tags 380136 patch
thanks for stopping processing here
I found that dpkg-buildpackage would fail various different ways
depending on what the /usr/bin/java alternative was pointing to. This
patch makes it work regardless of the alternative.
Thanks,
stew
diff -ru lucene-1.4.3.debian.orig/debian/ru
Hi again Claudio,
i see there's no reference to the library you mentionned: liblinc.
Could you run strace on mail-notification and see me over the result
as an attached file please?
thanks,
-Pascal
On 9/20/06, Claudio Belotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
on 20/09/2006 17:12 Pascal Giard wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 388451 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#388451: mail-notification: does not start, looks for liblinc.so.1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> thx!
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> --
Unknown command o
f-spot is looking for the library libgphoto2_port.so, but
libgphoto2-port0 (as of version 2.2.1-4) only provides
libgphoto2_port.so.0, so you have to create it:
ln -s /usr/lib/libgphoto2_port.so.0 /usr/lib/libgphoto2_port.so
Then it should work. So this is probably actually a bug in libgphoto2-p
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 12:42:51AM +0200, Ji Pale??ek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >I'd be stunned if this was actually a server problem, and not a
> >client-side problem related to grabs. Which window manager do you use?
> >Does changing it fix anything?
>
> I use openbox. However, I don't think it's a
clone 388163 -1
reassign -1 libc6-i386
retitle -1 libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf
retitle 388163 ia32-libs: Obsolete /etc/ldconfig/* links
thanks
Hi,
since libc6-i386 ships the 32bit ld.so and libc6 I feel that it is its
responsibility to setup the ld.so.conf correctly f
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7-smp
Version: 2.6.16-18
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I use the following kernel linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7 on my workstation. My home
is on the server mounted
with nfs. Starting Mozilla Firefox works fine.
As soon as I use the linux-imag
reassign 388461 libm17n-0
thanks
On further investigation I have found out that libm17n-0 stopped
providing /usr/lib/libm17n-X.so. So mgp fails miserably.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ll /usr/lib/libm17n*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 2006-09-20 16:01 /usr/lib/libm17n-core.so.0 ->
libm17n-core.so.0.1.0
-rw
merge 388461 384425
thanks
Nah, it was already reported...
--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' :-- Emma Goldman
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
`- www.amayita.com www.malapec
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 388125 upstream
Bug#388125: osgcal FTBFS (sparc): bus error in xvfb
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 388125
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2006-September/018251.html
Bug#388125: osgcal FTBFS (sparc): bus erro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388461 libm17n-0
Bug#388461: segmentation fault (fixed by just rebuilding mgp from source)
Bug reassigned from package `mgp' to `libm17n-0'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
I do not know if this helps, but in the log you have attached there is a
null pointer error...:
-
# This fails on current free JVMs, according to Blair Zajac.
# Thus the "-" prefix, to ignore failure, for now.
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules check-javahl
make[1
Just used aptitude to upgrade etch to current versions of everything
(except python; some package depended on the old version).
Still using the 2.6.16 kernel, though.
The problem still exists, so I'll be back to Ubuntu for another while.
I ask again -- is there anything I can do here to help ide
Package: xserver-xorg-video-chips
Version: 1:1.1.1-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xserver-xorg-video-chips_1:1.1.1-3 on peri by sbuild/hppa
> 85
> Build started at 20060920-0958
[...]
> ** Using build dependenc
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Version: 1:1.4.1.dfsg.1-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xserver-xorg-video-mga_1:1.4.1.dfsg.1-3 on peri by
> sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20060920-1021
[...]
> ** Using build
Package: xserver-xorg-video-cyrix
Version: 1:1.1.0-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xserver-xorg-video-cyrix_1:1.1.0-3 on caballero by
> sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060920-0541
[...]
> ** Using build
severity 388477 important
stop
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:16:20PM +0200, Matthias Kreis wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7-smp
> Version: 2.6.16-18
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
no one broken fs on one box is not critical
> I use the following kernel linux-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388461 m17n-lib
Bug#388461: segmentation fault (fixed by just rebuilding mgp from source)
Bug reassigned from package `libm17n-0' to `m17n-lib'.
> severity 388461 normal
Bug#388461: segmentation fault (fixed by just rebuilding mgp from source)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388477 important
Bug#388477: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7-smp: NFS Server no response with smp kernel
on AMD
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Package: xserver-xorg-video-rendition
Version: 1:4.1.0.dfsg.1-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xserver-xorg-video-rendition_1:4.1.0.dfsg.1-3 on peri by
> sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20060920-1030
[...]
> **
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 388163 -1
Bug#388163: ia32-libs: ldconfig files installed in wrong directory?
Bug 388163 cloned as bug 388489.
> reassign -1 libc6-i386
Bug#388489: ia32-libs: ldconfig files installed in wrong directory?
Bug reassigned from package `ia32-libs' to
Package: tla
Version: 1.3.5+dfsg-4
Severity: grave
The following sequence of commands show that tla is mostly
useless. This is an old style tla archive, but I use tla and baz
interchangeably -- until tla stopped working.
manoj
__> tla tree-id
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/libselinux--
Package: network-manager-kde
Version: 0.09+0.1r577960-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When you call knetworkmanager its answers:
Error requesting name, org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied:
Connection ":1.9" is not allowed to own the service
"o
Package: php4
Version: 4:4.4.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
I'm trying to rebuild the php4 package however it is impossible
to satisfy the build requirements. The source package seems to
require apache-dev and apache2-prefork-dev yet apt does not allow
me to i
__> tla update
* tree is already up to date
__> baz update
* Scanning for full-tree revision: ..
* from revision library (linking): [EMAIL
PROTECTED]/libselinux--devo--1.30--patch-13
* Applying 1 revisions: . done.
* checking tree for local changes
* updating for new patches in archive
* applying
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:57:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Cloning this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:37:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388498: network-manager-kde: Does not run correctly, dbus
error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:12:02 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 12:42:51AM +0200, Ji Pale??ek wrote:
Hi!
>I'd be stunned if this was actually a server problem, and not a
>client-side problem related to grabs. Which window manager do you use?
>Does changing it fix an
Tags 386202 + pending
Thanks
I have reviewed Arjan's package, I consider it well done,
and I'm going to upload it.
Since gnome-pilot was uploaded to 3-day delayed queue, and
gnome-pilot-conduits needs gnome-pilot in order to build, I'm going to
upload the new conduits version to 4-day delayed qu
[Eugen Dedu]
> I do not know if this helps, but in the log you have attached there
> is a null pointer error...:
Indeed, but it's in the Java section. We've pretty much been ignoring
the Java testsuite ever since we added it to the build, because free
JVMs have _never_ been able to complete it s
tags 374173 - help
tags 374173 + patch pending
thanks
The attached patch should fix this bug, thanks to Diego Berrueta, the
upstream author.
Next upload will close #374173.
--
bye,
- Nacho
# Fixing #374173
# Thanks to Diego Berrueta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -ur zinc-compiler-1.0.2.orig
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 354622 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7-1
Bug#354622: Using Firefox as the app name without official branding is still a
trademark violation
Bug marked as found in version 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7-1.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 379413 grave
Bug#379413: fails to install
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Tags 386202 + pending
Bug#386202: gnome-pilot-conduits: FTBFS with libpisock9 (pilot-link 0.12.0)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 374173 - help
Bug#374173: zinc-compiler: Problems running cyi, the interactive interpreter
for Zinc.
Tags were: help upstream
Tags removed: help
> tags 374173 + patch pending
Bug#374173: zinc-compiler: Problems running cyi, the interactive interp
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 01:06, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm saying that forcing the removal of aoetools from etch because it
> doesn't support mounting aoe devices at boot time won't get you any closer
> to your goal; instead, it will prevent users from using this packages for
> applications
Hi all!
I cannot actually check something since I am in Georgia and far away from any
of my computers, kut I have some questions/comments:
. Original Message ...
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:07:33 +0200 "Frans Pop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Looks like the 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-new is there bec
Package: gij-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-13
Severity: grave
sh-3.1# gcj-dbtool-4.1 -n /var/lib/gcj-4.1/classmap.db
Segmentation fault
This happens on arm, and, according to vorlon, hppa. The postinst runs this
if /var/lib/gcj-4.1/classmap.db doesn't exist.
This is breaking various builds, like xulrunner
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:46:33PM +0400, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I cannot actually check something since I am in Georgia and far away from any
> of my computers, kut I have some questions/comments:
>
> . Original Message ...
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:07:33 +0200 "Frans Pop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 382907 with 370436
Bug#382907: RM: mozilla-locale-fr -- RoM; RC-buggy
Was blocked by: 370436 382956
Blocking bugs of 382907 removed: 370436, 382956
> unblock 384179 with 370436
Bug#384179: RM: mozilla-locale-sl -- RoM; depends on to-be-removed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> merge 387875 388505
Bug#387875: gij-4.1 4.1.1-13: segfault in postinst on hppa and arm
Bug#388505: gcj-dbtool-4.1 call in postinst segfaults on fresh installs on arm,
hppa
Merged 387
Package: libnotify-dev
Version: 0.4.2-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
libnotify.pc has GTK+2.O in the requires line but libnotify-dev doesn't
depends directly or inderectly on libgtk2.0-dev causing pkg-config
--libs libnotify to fail.
--
Xtophe
-- System Inf
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:05:59AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 06:36:34PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> >>> If you aren't aware of any free sample bank, this doesn't mean they
> >>> don't exist...
> >> This is not the way it works.
> > IMHO it is the way it w
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
