Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 13:38:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:21:39PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:14:11PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:55:16AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 22:11 +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > > > Uploaded.
> > >
> > > Thank
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 350344 critical
Bug#350344: syslog-ng: Filter rule and level(debug) problem
Bug#350120: syslog-ng: certain facilities are completely ignored in the conf;
goes into syslog as a result
Severity set to `critical' from `important'
> thanks.
Stopp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> severity 369299 serious
Bug#369299: libasound2: pcm.c:2146:(snd_pcm_open_noupdate) Unknown PCM default
Bug#369302: ALSA lib control.c:816:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Invalid CTL default
B
Suggestions on how to make eclipse work under Debian should be
included under /usr/share/doc/eclipse. This should include suggested
vm, and how to start eclipse with that vm. Please be very specific.
If eclipse crashes, then the bug should stay open, even if the eclipse
developer can't do anythi
Hi Steve,
it seems that gmp 4.2.1 has been released 2006-05-04 and is readily
available for download. I'm not sure why there hasn't been an
announcement, but the known issues list indicates that this should be fixed.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUB
Replying to two emails at once here:
On 30 May 2006 at 10:37, Camm Maguire wrote:
| Greetings!
|
| Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > On 26 May 2006 at 22:45, Frederik Schueler wrote:
| > | Hi,
| > |
| > | On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:18:35PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:26:21AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to note: a new upstream version 4.2.1 is at "release candidate"
> status. I have alerted upstream about this problem and expect that it
> will be addressed in the next upstream release. I'll leave it until
> then.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 369469 serious
Bug#369469: libasound2: invalid datadir path - alsa.conf not found
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> severity 369455 serious
Bug#369455: alsa-base: Wrong path to alsa.conf causes mplayer, xmms to fail
Severity set to
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Fabio Marzocca wrote:
> I am strictly compliant with Gnome Policy about AppIcons:
> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/AppIcon
> It is hard to follow 2 diverging policies
So follow the Debian policy, which is the controlling one for Debian
packages?
--
I think this bug it due to ongoing removal of evil libtool .la files in
Debian since the last month.
It is probably already solved with the latest packages in Sid.
Hope it helps.
--
Jérôme Warnier
FLOSS Consultant
http://beeznest.net
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 21:42:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line CAN-2005-0605: buffer overflow
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 05:41:12PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Package: lesstif1
> Version: 1:0.93.18-5
> Severity: grave, woody
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> I am not sure if lesstif1 is affected of CAN-2005-0605. If it is not,
> then please add an entry to
>
> h
Il giorno ven, 12/05/2006 alle 00.25 +0800, Steven McCoy ha scritto:
> Package: phpldapadmin
> Version: 0.9.8.2-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
I'm sorry, but I can't reproduce the bug on my sid machines.
Is the bug still present or have you found a fix for it? Could
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:06:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libasound2 counterstrike
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:06:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libasound2 counterstrike
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:06:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libasound2 counterstrike
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 13:06:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326246: due to removal of libtool .la files in Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
reopen 300421
close 300421 1:0.93.94-11.1
thanks
sorry for the previous wrong closing message. this bug has in fact
been fixed in 1:0.93.94-11.1 upload by [EMAIL PROTECTED], that was
in the changelog. Sorry I've missed something that obvious.
that mail will reopen and use the nice BTS version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 300421
Bug#300421: CAN-2005-0605: buffer overflow
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> close 300421 1:0.93.94-11.1
Bug#300421: CAN-2005-0605: buffer overflow
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367038 grave
Bug#367038: every upload of gcc breaks links in include directory
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Please find attached an updated version of the patch suggested by Andreas
Jochens.
diff -urN gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1.old/debian/compat
gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/compat
--- gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1.old/debian/compat 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ gcc-h8300-hms-2.95.2.2.1/debian/c
Firstly, I'm really sorry that you filed this bug 52 days ago. One of
the problems with using a list as a Maintainer is that this got held for
moderation (I assume or rejected out right) because of the size of the
attachments. And the list admin is AWOL and hasn't been doing work on
xfce for a wh
severity 366370 important
thanks
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:05:44AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 03:02:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Is there any progress on this bug? This is currently among the issues
> > blocking us from having an installable desktop task for a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 366370 important
Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Package: cl-irc
Severity: grave
Heya,
You're depending on a non-existant package (and I don't see something
fitting waiting in NEW).
Marc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles
Severity: grave
Heya,
This package isn't installable, as pike7.6 seems to be too new. Either
update the package or ask for removal, please.
Thanks,
Marc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/s390-udeb'
> make: *** [/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/stamp-dir/build_udeb] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060530-0803
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage di
Package: schroot
Version: 0.2.10-1
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
The session cleanup in 10mount ignores failures of umount invocations
and cleanup continues. In the case of file chroots with a /home bind
mount that failed to umount, the rm -rf in 05file blindly descen
Package: ysm
Severity: grave
Hi,
Your package build system is severly broken, leading to a broken Depends
field. In its current state, it is missing some dependencies and is
uninstallable on those archs which don't provide a libc6 package.
This patch fixes the problem:
--- debian/control.orig 2
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Version: 1:1.2.1.3.dfsg.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I can't install xserver-xorg-video-mga on my etch system, which I just
upgraded from sarge. Dselect reports:
xserver-xorg-video-mga depends on xserver-xorg-core (>= 0.99.0-1)
x
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 369611 -1 -2
Bug#369611: uninstallable in unstable (pike7.6 too new)
Bug 369611 cloned as bugs 369628-369629.
> reassign -1 pike7.6-public.network.pcap
Bug#369628: uninstallable in unstable (pike7.6 too new)
Bug reassigned from package `pike7.6-p
Hi!
The issue you are experiencing seems to be due to record-marker length
lack of interoperability.
In brief, AIUI, the problem is that Fortran standard specifications do
not mandate any low level form for unformatted file I/O.
Hence every compiler adopts its own form and *no* unformatted file
i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 350344 important
Bug#350344: syslog-ng: Filter rule and level(debug) problem
Bug#350120: syslog-ng: certain facilities are completely ignored in the conf;
goes into syslog as a result
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopp
severity 350344 important
thanks
> I'm upgrading the severity as well as this causes serious problems when
> evaluating logs using logcheck or the like.
That does not conform to the definition of a "critical" severity bug,
downgrading back to important.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:26:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369624: xserver-xorg-video-mga: uninstallable on etch -
depends on unavailable version of xserver-xorg-core
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Package: libc6-udeb
Version: 2.3.6-11
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
It seems that libc6-udeb breaks d-i since the last hour or so:
"Loading libc6-udeb failed for unknown reasons. Aborting." (in syslog:
annash: error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open
shared object fi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> close 254785 3.0+3.0.1rc11-1
Bug#254785: dhcp3-server: purging fails on woody
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 362318 ftp.debian.org
Bug#362318: FTBFS: build-dependencies cannot be fulfiled
Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-di-powerpc' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 362318 RM
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:58:36AM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Yes, no arch seemed to build it, however:
> > configure.ac:44: error: m4_defn: undefined macro: _AC_LANG
> > autoconf/lang.m4:157: AC_LANG_POP is expanded from...
> > aut
Luca Bruno writes:
Runnnig `foomatic-db-engine -O` in gdb says that the bug is at line
1840:
Running it under valgrind is more telling. It's a buffer overflow.
I get this first:
==8614== Source and destination overlap in strcpy(0xBEEED388, 0xBEEED388)
==8614==at 0x401E83B: strcpy (mac_
reassign 369547 gfortran-4.0
tags 369547 + fixed-upstream
tags 369547 + upstream
severity 369547 important
thanks
gfortran-4.0 is not generally unusable.
Francesco Poli writes:
> Hi!
>
> The issue you are experiencing seems to be due to record-marker length
> lack of interoperability.
>
> In br
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 369547 gfortran-4.0
Bug#369547: gfortran: strange behaviour in unformatted writing
Bug reassigned from package `gfortran' to `gfortran-4.0'.
> tags 369547 + fixed-upstream
Bug#369547: gfortran: strange behaviour in unformatted writing
There we
* Michael Stone [Sat, 27 May 2006 13:19:29 -0400]:
> See 5.96-3 for my current strategy for dealing with these changes.
Can this bug be closed, then?
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 368917 important
Bug#368917: lbdb: does not work with coreutils 5.96-1 (sort: open failed: +1:
No such file or directory)
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
severity 368917 important
thanks
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 26 May 2006 00:05:12 +0200]:
> Package: lbdb
> Version: 0.31.1
> Severity: serious
The POSIX compatibility change was reverted in coreutils 5.96-3, and it
seems it'll stay like that for etch. Now the following warning is
emitted:
% lbdbq fo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 364959 +testing
Unknown tag/s: testing.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n e
Hi all,
You're right: 4.2.1 has been released. I didn't realize that because
only a "release candidate" has been announced on the email list
http://swox.com/list-archives/gmp-announce/2006-April/14.html
Unfortunately, release 4.2.1 has the same library version bug
for libgmpxx. So we'll
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 18:02:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364791: fixed in foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20060530-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
I can reproduce this, with both 2.3.6-11 and 2.3.6-12, on i386.
Apparently, libc.so.6 is now linked with libgcc_s.so.1 on i386, which was
not previously the case with version -9.
Version -9:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>ldd /lib/libc.so.6
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xa7feb000)
linux-gate.so.1 =
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 18:02:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362586: fixed in foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20060530-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 18:02:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366254: fixed in foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20060530-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 18:02:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366254: fixed in foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20060530-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 18:02:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364791: fixed in foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20060530-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
clone 368883 -1
reassign -1 g++-4.0
severity -1 important
thanks
This ICE also happens with g++-4.1 and gcc-snapshot.
Working on a minimal test case.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 21:00 -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Unfortunately, release 4.2.1 has the same library version bug
> for libgmpxx. So we'll have to wait for 4.2.2.
Ew, I tend to disagree. The changelog on their web page lists a "shared
library version correct" as a bugfix and indeed the t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 367038 etch
Bug#367038: every upload of gcc breaks links in include directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 368883 -1
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Bug 368883 cloned as bug 369642.
> reassign -1 g++-4.0
Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Bug reassigned from package `qt4-x11' to `g++-4.0'.
> severity -1 important
Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on al
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 04:00:52AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 21:00 -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Unfortunately, release 4.2.1 has the same library version bug
> > for libgmpxx. So we'll have to wait for 4.2.2.
>
> Ew, I tend to disagree. The changelog on their web pa
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:50:29AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Michael Stone [Sat, 27 May 2006 13:19:29 -0400]:
See 5.96-3 for my current strategy for dealing with these changes.
Can this bug be closed, then?
No. I'd like to see how it goes before the package migrates to testing.
Mike Sto
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 367502 cacao_0.95-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: undeclared functions
Bug#367502: cacao_0.95-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on amd64: undeclared functions
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
retitle 367502 cacao_0.95-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: undeclared functions
thanks
I've confirmed that this bug is also reproducible on i386 where the package
has previously built, not just on amd64. So this is indeed an RC bug.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a
clone 367048 -1 -2
retitle 367048 synfig: floating point exception on alpha
retitle -1 synfig: uses lots of memory, triggering the OOM killer
severity -1 serious
forwarded -1
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1497893&group_id=144022&atid=757416
tags -1 + upstream
retitle -2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 367048 -1 -2
Bug#367048: synfig: crashes on alpha, m68k, mipsel, powerpc
Bug 367048 cloned as bugs 369646-369647.
> retitle 367048 synfig: floating point exception on alpha
Bug#367048: synfig: crashes on alpha, m68k, mipsel, powerpc
Changed Bug t
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 05:32:11PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> > > The package conflicts with libgl1-mesa-dev but does not provide
> > >
> > > /usr/include/GL/glx.h
> > > /usr/include/GL/glxext.h
> > > /usr/include/GL/glx_mangle.h
> >
> > Yeah, these are all specific to GLX, which
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:50:41AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 May 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc
> > Well, running -reconfigure just complains its not installed... Trying to
> dpkg-reconfigure
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313605: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315784: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349120: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349442: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349442: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349120: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313605: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315784: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
clone 369448 -1
reassign 369448 linux-2.6
reassign -1 kernel-package
retitle 369448 [powerpc] failure in pre-inst script, package fails to install
retitle -1 [powerpc] failure in pre-inst script, package fails to install
thanks
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 12:47:55AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
>
> On
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 08:40:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366852: phpldapadmin: PHP segfault on tree.php
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
201 - 276 of 276 matches
Mail list logo
