Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 158828
Bug#158828: Sketch: dependency with python
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Tobias Hoevekamp <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
> close 205053
Bug#205053: sketch: not i
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:13:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed with tinyerp-server 3.2.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Quoting Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Romain Francoise wrote:
> > Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Please remove these from 'main' ASAP.
> >
> >
> > Don't:
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001>
> >
> That's not directly relevant, since it's about t
Quoting Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You don't have any kind of authority, as far as I know.
>
> I didn't say I did. I quoted "like debian-legal tells me it needs to be
> done," and noted that debian-legal had in fact said that. A clear
> majority at any rate. That's all.
debian-l
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:02:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348644: fixed in kdeedu 4:3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Ryan Richter wrote:
> Would someone please kindly fix this? It's been almost 6 months now,
> and I'm getting rather sick of recompiling mozilla myself.
>
> AMD64 gets no respect...
>
Loic, you a time-slot NMU this? I am currently under 120% load, so I p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 351023 grave
Bug#351023: myspell-et: Myspell dictionary is unusable
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Package: libmail-spf-query-perl
Version: 1.998-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
/usr/bin/make test
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libmail-spf-query-perl-1.998'
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Ryan Richter wrote:
> Loic, you a time-slot NMU this? I am currently under 120% load, so I probably
> won't have time for it in the near future!
What's the correct patch to
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Ryan Richter wrote:
> > Loic, you a time-slot NMU this? I am currently under 120% load, so I
> > probab
[ note that I am *not* myspell-et's maintainer, but myspell-de-*'s which also
is buiolt from ispell, but with upstreams Makefile. Which is apparently what
Björn does also for the de_DE* stuff for the zips ]
Hi,
most packages in Debian do build directly from the ispell stuff and work.
Thast est
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Ryan Richter wrote:
>> Loic, you a time-slot NMU this? I am currently under 120% load, so
>> I probably
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:40:47PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Ryan Richter wrote:
>>> Loic, you a
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:10:25PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Ryan Richter wrote:
>
> >> L
Daniel Schepler wrote:
> If I add netbase to the Build-Depends, the package builds fine [in my
> pbuilder chroot].
Is it really necessary to list "netbase" in a package's "Build-Depends
(-Indep)" control field? Or could there be something wrong with your
pbuilder?
(Sorry, I have little experi
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 06:02:44 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350694: fixed in velocity 1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:30:54PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:10:25PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Note: The upstream log mentions gcc bugs thrown is *as* *well*:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22591
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
On 02/02/06, Hasso Tepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: myspell-et
> Version: 20030606.2
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Myspell dictionary in the package is useless for estonians. Because you
> decided not to take myspell dictionaries from original site, but to generate
> it from the ispell dicti
Le Jeudi 02 Février 2006 15:01, vous avez écrit :
> Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > If I add netbase to the Build-Depends, the package builds fine [in my
> > pbuilder chroot].
>
> Is it really necessary to list "netbase" in a package's "Build-Depends
> (-Indep)" control field? Or could there be somethi
There is no way to generate myspell dictionary from ispell one for
Estonian. Ispell just doesn't have support for compound words. Using -C
is ugly workaround, which makes ispell dictionary somewhat usable for
estonians, but it's acceptable only because there is no better
alternatives for apps n
Daniel Schepler wrote:
Le Mardi 31 Janvier 2006 17:35, vous avez écrit :
Daniel Schepler wrote:
I got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ ./mmap-test
Successfully mapped NUL page at 0xb7fe9000 (is 0)
THANK YOU. I now have complete confidence that adding 1 (one) to the
initial mmap fix
Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Julian Mehnle wrote::
> > Is it really necessary to list "netbase" in a package's "Build-Depends
> > (-Indep)" control field? Or could there be something wrong with your
> > pbuilder?
> >
> > (Sorry, I have little experience with Debian packages that require a
> > net conn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 347556 + fixed
Bug#347556: linux-image-2.6.15-1-alpha-generic: undefined symbols in xfs.ko on
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> tag 347711 + fixed
Bug#347711: kernel: linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-generic panics when pppd is run
Tags were: patch
Package: ant
Version: 1.6.5-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The example build.xml file reports the following error with 1.6.5-4,
1.6.5-5, but worked up to 1.6.5-3 (explicitly checked with 1.6.2):
build.xml:3: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access field
org.apac
Package: libcontactsdb
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
libcontactsdb failed to build on all buildds, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder.
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for CONTACTSDB... configure: error: Package requirements (sqlite
li
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 350458 serious
Bug#350458: Xft.h includes freetype headers, .pc file does not reflect this
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 351076 normal
Bug#351076: ant: Java illegalAccess exception with the kaffee compiled version
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
severity 351076 normal
thanks
Hi Akos,
this is not grave if it fails for one type of build file, therefore
lowered severity to normal. ant is used here in almost all the package builds
and no build failed because of the new upload.
Frohner Akos wrote:
> The example build.xml file reports the f
reassign 350903 tetex-base
thanks
Hi Matt, hi teTeX Debian Masters!
I don't know exactely how this can happen, but I guess I will add a bug
report script echoing various settings.
It seems that this happens with tetex3 (as pdfetex in texlive packages
are 1.30.5 version (and not 1.21a).
As it on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 350988 serious
Bug#350988: rss-glx: installs /#usr dir
Severity set to `serious'.
> merge 350988 350985
Bug#350985: rss-glx: Installs dirs in /#usr !
Bug#350988: rss-glx: installs /#usr dir
Merged 350985 350988.
>
End of message, stopping pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 350903 tetex-base
Bug#350903: cmr10 not loadable
Bug reassigned from package `texinfo' to `tetex-base'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:32:20 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350985: fixed in rss-glx 0.8.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:32:20 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350985: fixed in rss-glx 0.8.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:32:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349627: fixed in twisted 2.1.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:32:22 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350895: fixed in twisted-runner 0.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Daniel Schepler wrote:
If I add netbase to the Build-Depends, the package builds fine [in my
pbuilder chroot].
Is it really necessary to list "netbase" in a package's "Build-Depends
(-Indep)" control field? Or could there be something wrong with your
pbuilder?
Package: xfonts-terminus
Version: 4.16-2
Severity: serious
Justification: build-depends must exist
Hi,
I just tried to build this package from source and realized that
it build depends on a non-existing package `bdf2psf'. Please specify
the correct build dependencies.
Regards,
Bastian
-- Syst
Your message dated Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:12:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not an NMU, closing.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:17:21 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Uninstallable due to unmet dep on bzr (< 0.7)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Subject: elinks shows no content
Package: elinks
Version: 0.10.4-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Elinks only shows URI (upper right) and statusline: OK [-]
but no content on one host. On other host it works fine.
What i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 334235
Bug#334235: visualboyadvance: FTBFS: g++ needs lots of RAM.
Bug#334727: visualboyadvance - fails to build
Disconnected #334235 from all other report(s).
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:57:56PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Package: xfonts-terminus
> Version: 4.16-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: build-depends must exist
>
> I just tried to build this package from source and realized that
> it build depends on a non-existing package `bdf2psf'
Please let me know, Alan, if you need some help to resolve this issue
also I found online your fresh version of the plug-in I believe
http://users.aber.ac.uk/ajw05/debian/mozilla-stumbleupon_2.2-1_all.deb
is it in working condition? what is the reason why it wasn't duploaded
to Debian repository?
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:33:58 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#205742: fixed in python-reportlab 1.20debian-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:33:44 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349845: fixed in mednafen 0.4.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hello.
Apparently, procmail 3.22-14 has entered testing today (don't know why yet),
so I have uploaded procmail_3.22-15 for unstable, which hopefully
fixes this bug, but I'm not completely sure.
Will close this bug by hand once I verify that it's actually fixed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Your message dated Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:47:40 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351097: elinks shows no content
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:32:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350689: fixed in libmpeg3 1.5.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:32:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287422: fixed in libmpeg3 1.5.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> user debian-release@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-release@lists.debian.org (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> usertag 328031 rc-sparc
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: rc-sparc.
> severity 328031 important
Bug#328031: erlang: ftbfs [sparc]
clone 310551 -1
severity -1 normal
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt -- RoQA; unmaintained, does not apply to
current kernels
thanks
Hi Russell,
Since this bug has been open for 9 months with no response, the patch has
not been applicable to current kernels for lo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 310551 -1
Bug#310551: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
Bug 310551 cloned as bug 351187.
> severity -1 normal
Bug#351187: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
Severity set to `nor
clone 310580 -1
severity -1 normal
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: kernel-patch-psd -- RoQA; unmaintained, does not apply to
current kernels
thanks
Hi Pawel,
Since this bug has been open for 9 months with no response, the patch has
not been applicable to current kernels for longer, and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 310580 -1
Bug#310580: 'kernel-patch-psd' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
Bug 310580 cloned as bug 351188.
> severity -1 normal
Bug#351188: 'kernel-patch-psd' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
Severity set to `normal'.
> reass
Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:13:35 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing: build successful on hppa
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:02:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343034: fixed in ccmalloc 0.4.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
clone 255382 -1
severity -1 normal
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: kernel-patch-scanlogic -- RoQA; unmaintained, does not apply to
current kernels
thanks
Hi Rene,
I'm thinking that since this kernel patch hasn't applied to any current
kernel in two years, it should probably be removed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 255382 -1
Bug#255382: supports only older kernels, probably should be removed from testing
Bug 255382 cloned as bug 351194.
> severity -1 normal
Bug#351194: supports only older kernels, probably should be removed from testing
Severity set to `nor
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:47:21 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314988: fixed in geomview 1.8.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:01:02AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Daniel Schepler wrote:
>
> >Le Mardi 31 Janvier 2006 17:35, vous avez écrit :
> >
> >
> >>Daniel Schepler wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I got:
> >>>
> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ ./mmap-test
> >>>Successfully mapped NUL page at 0xb7fe9000
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 06:25:59PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> As it only happens on alpha, could it be a new instance of the failed
> hardware problem?
I don't know. I asked the administrator of the machine and they
didn't seem to think it was hardware-specific.
> I assume that it is an up
Hi,
I'm sorry, but I have a question:
Is Sarge / stable going to get an update for these problems?
In particular, CVE-2005-3390 (GLOBALS array overwrite) for PHP, which
I believe Sarge / stable is vulnerable to (CVE entry says it applies
to "PHP 4.x up to 4.4.0"), and it is (IMO) a real-world se
Your message dated Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:06:38 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line evolution-webcal: 350413: needs binNMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
63 matches
Mail list logo
