On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Ryan Richter wrote: > > Loic, you a time-slot NMU this? I am currently under 120% load, so I > > probably > > won't have time for it in the near future! > > What's the correct patch to apply here? Build with -O instead of -O2, or > to try the bugzilla patch provided by Lionel? > > I'll try to trick lool so we prepare a NMU in the next few days. >
>From what I read in the bugzilla bug-report it looks as if this is in fact a gcc-4.0 bug. Thus, I would probably prefer -O to work around this instead of patching the code-base. Of course, I cannot confirm that it really works flawlessly with that option set, but IMO its worth a try :) - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack | : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `- http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
