On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:12:35PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> >>fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
> >>A "solution" to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1
> >>and also t
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>>fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
A "solution" to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1
and also to upload a new fop package with an embedded batik
library in the current versi
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> I prepared a package for the batik 1.5.1 upstream release.
> However during testing the package I realized that batik 1.5.1
> breaks fop ! As far as I see no other packages depend on
> libbatik-java.
> fop is currently not in testing
Hi,
I prepared a package for the batik 1.5.1 upstream release.
However during testing the package I realized that batik 1.5.1
breaks fop ! As far as I see no other packages depend on
libbatik-java.
fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
A "solution" to the problem would be to u
4 matches
Mail list logo