Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>>fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
A "solution" to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1
and also to upload a new fop package with an embedded batik
library in the current version (with the affected Squiggle
class files removed from the library).
fop is not really a valid candidate, although it appears to be in
grep-excuses. Both libfop-java and libfop-java-doc are uninstallable on
their own right in unstable, because libfop-java depends on fop and fop
conflicts with libfop-java. You can safely ignore this package for the time
being...
There was a small discussion on debian-java the last minutes. I will
prepare a patched fop release which should compile against batik 1.5.1
Should therefore the libfop-java and libfop-java-doc binary packages
removed in the new package ? I think they are transitional packages
not needed anymore as fop is not in testing at all. Am I right ?
(I CC debian-java for this binary package removal question)
Regards,
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
