On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > I prepared a package for the batik 1.5.1 upstream release. > However during testing the package I realized that batik 1.5.1 > breaks fop ! As far as I see no other packages depend on > libbatik-java.
> fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate. > A "solution" to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1 > and also to upload a new fop package with an embedded batik > library in the current version (with the affected Squiggle > class files removed from the library). fop is not really a valid candidate, although it appears to be in grep-excuses. Both libfop-java and libfop-java-doc are uninstallable on their own right in unstable, because libfop-java depends on fop and fop conflicts with libfop-java. You can safely ignore this package for the time being... -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
