Package: elpa-magit-forge
Version: 0.3.2+git20231227.1.299bbaa-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Upgrading to the new snapshot of magit-forge on testing results in the
following:
install/magit-forge-0.3.2.50snapshot: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs
install/magit-forge-0.3.2.5
Package: rakarrack
Followup-For: Bug #1068431
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Please find attached a patch for this issue which has been uploaded to
Ubuntu.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1068431 [rakarrack] rakarrack dependencies unsatisfiable on 32-bit
non-i386 architectures.
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1068431: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068431
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Your message dated Sat, 13 Apr 2024 01:53:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056785: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013395,
regarding mpdecimal: FTBFS with Sphinx 5.0, docutils 0.18: make[1]: ***
[debian/rules:60: override_dh_sphinxdoc] Error 255
t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1067623 [src:acm] FTBFS: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type
‘long int’, but argument 2 has type ‘__time64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’}
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1067623: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067623
Debian Bug Tra
Package: acm
Followup-For: Bug #1067623
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Please find attached a patch for this issue which has been uploaded to
Ubuntu.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free
Your message dated Sat, 13 Apr 2024 00:36:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066612: fixed in prctl 1.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066612,
regarding prctl: FTBFS: prctl.c:82:31: error: implicit declaration of function
‘prctl’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be mar
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1066315 [src:kraptor] kraptor: FTBFS: src/main.c:57:5: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘mkdir’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1066315: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066315
Debian Bug T
Package: kraptor
Followup-For: Bug #1066315
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Please find attached a patch for this issue which has been uploaded to
Ubuntu.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a F
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 23:21:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066434: fixed in uucp 1.07-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066434,
regarding uucp: FTBFS: ../uucp.h:103:3: error: #error ANSI C compiler without
void or unsigned char or prototypes
to be marked as done.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 02:56:02PM -0600, Zixing Liu wrote:
> Package: ucspi-tcp
> Followup-For: Bug #1066629
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve t
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:35:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068586: fixed in ghc 9.4.7-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068586,
regarding ghc: Broken on arm{el,hf} because of time_t transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Package: scrollz
Followup-For: Bug #1066483
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* debian/patches/gcc13.patch: Fix build with GCC 13 and add mis
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1066483 [src:scrollz] scrollz: FTBFS: configure: error: Fatal: You must
get working getaddrinfo() function.
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1066483: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066483
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:19:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068880: fixed in fwbuilder 5.3.7-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068880,
regarding fwbuilder FTBFS: error: debhelper compat level specified both in
debian/compat and in debian/control
to be marked as don
control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
You will find a merge request for fixing CVE-2023-52160
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/wpa/-/merge_requests/15
I can do a NMU if neeeded
Bastien
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1064061 [src:wpa] wpa: CVE-2023-52160
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1064061: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064061
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1066529 [src:samhain] samhain: FTBFS: x_sh_prelude.c:840:42: error:
implicit declaration of function ‘isblank’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1066529: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066529
Deb
Package: samhain
Followup-For: Bug #1066529
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* debian/patches/gcc13.patch: Add missing includes and use va_c
Source: ucommon
Version: 7.0.1-0.3
X-Debbugs-Cc: vor...@debian.org
Severity: serious
Hi Steve,
with your last ucommon NMU you have fixed the armel/armhf builds but you have
introduced a symbol-based FTBFS on i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ucommon&arch=i386&ver=7.0.1-0.3&st
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1061519 + fixed-upstream
Bug #1061519 [src:shim] shim: CVE-2023-40546 CVE-2023-40547 CVE-2023-40548
CVE-2023-40549 CVE-2023-40550 CVE-2023-40551
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Package: ucspi-tcp
Followup-For: Bug #1066629
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* debian/patches/0006-implicit-declarations.patch: Add missin
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1066629 [src:ucspi-tcp] ucspi-tcp: FTBFS: tcpserver.c:143:29: error:
implicit declaration of function ‘getpid’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1066629: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066629
Deb
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:46:23 +0200
with message-id <11882ebd-7357-4e46-887d-e08bc8001...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: ucommon: FTBFS on armel and armhf: dpkg-gensymbols: error:
some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below
has caused the Debian
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 20:42:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1058396: fixed in pdudaemon 0.0.8.109.gaa25f15-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058396,
regarding pdudaemon: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest
-i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" retur
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:22:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068812: fixed in pcb-rnd 3.1.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068812,
regarding pcb-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
On 2024-04-12, at 10:58:59 -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Jeremy Sowden writes:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > On 2024-04-12, at 16:56:25 +0200, Clément Calmels wrote:
> >> Package: mu4e
> >> Version: 1.12.3-2
> >> Severity: grave
> >> Justification: renders package unusable
> >>
> >> Dear Ma
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:04:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068811: fixed in camv-rnd 1.1.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068811,
regarding camv-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:05:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068810: fixed in sch-rnd 1.0.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068810,
regarding sch-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:04:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066243: fixed in bristol 0.60.11-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066243,
regarding bristol: FTBFS: bristolmemorymoog.c:280:25: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘doPitchWheel’ [-Werror=implicit-fun
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:49:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066223: fixed in ftpcopy 0.6.7-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066223,
regarding ftpcopy: FTBFS: conftest1663576.c:7:9: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘_exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declarat
Gianfranco Costamagna writes:
> yes, but the library was renamed in librnd4t64, so either you need to
> depend on the new one, or drop it, to let the auto decrufter finish
> the time64_t transition and decruft it.
Ah, thank you, that's a useful observation. Since the relevant version
hasn't mad
Source: fwbuilder
Version: 5.3.7-7
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: Jeremy Bícha
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=fwbuilder&ver=5.3.7-7
...
fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh clean
dh: warning: Please specify the debhelper compat level exactly once.
dh: warning: * debian/co
Jeremy Sowden writes:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2024-04-12, at 16:56:25 +0200, Clément Calmels wrote:
>> Package: mu4e
>> Version: 1.12.3-2
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: renders package unusable
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> I upgraded my Sid machine with the latest mu4e and mai
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:39:29 +0200
with message-id <5225a1ac62a59534fe684972fc33ff676eb6d276.ca...@physics.uu.se>
and subject line Re: Bug#1068134: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts: arch:all
package depends on pre-t64 library
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068134,
regarding glob
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1068133 5.1-3
Bug #1068133 {Done: Mattias Ellert }
[src:globus-gram-audit] globus-gram-audit: arch:all package depends on pre-t64
library
Marked as fixed in versions globus-gram-audit/5.1-3.
> fixed 1068134 7.3-2
Bug #1068134 [src:globus-g
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:09:48 +0200
with message-id <23bcc6fd0dcd734d36e68aee94a4bf6e3f00.ca...@physics.uu.se>
and subject line Re: Bug#1068133: globus-gram-audit: arch:all package depends
on pre-t64 library
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068133,
regarding globus-gram-audit:
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:09:41 -0700
with message-id <87v84mbj8q@debian-hx90.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#1068754: circe: FTBFS: failing tests
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068754,
regarding circe: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Processing control commands:
> found 1068134 7.3-1
Bug #1068134 [src:globus-gram-job-manager-scripts]
globus-gram-job-manager-scripts: arch:all package depends on pre-t64 library
Marked as found in versions globus-gram-job-manager-scripts/7.3-1.
> notfound 1068134 7.3-2
Bug #1068134 [src:globus-g
Control: found 1068134 7.3-1
Control: notfound 1068134 7.3-2
The bug reported here is already fixed in the version for which the bug
was reported.
This bug was present in the previous version. The current version was
uploaded precisely to fix the problem reported.
Previous version (7.3-1) had
D
Processing control commands:
> found 1068133 5.1-2
Bug #1068133 [src:globus-gram-audit] globus-gram-audit: arch:all package
depends on pre-t64 library
Marked as found in versions globus-gram-audit/5.1-2.
> notfound 1068133 5.1-3
Bug #1068133 [src:globus-gram-audit] globus-gram-audit: arch:all pac
Control: found 1068133 5.1-2
Control: notfound 1068133 5.1-3
The bug reported here is already fixed in the version for which the bug
was reported.
This bug was present in the previous version. The current version was
uploaded precisely to fix the problem reported.
Previous version (5.1-2) had
D
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1068757 in python-musicpd reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-musicpd/-/commit/a9aca
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1068757 [src:python-musicpd] python-musicpd: FTBFS: dh_installchangelogs:
error: could not find changelog
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1068757: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068757
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:49:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066238: fixed in dvbackup 1:0.0.4-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066238,
regarding dvbackup: FTBFS: dvconnect.c:264:33: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘memcpy’ [-Werror=implicit-function-decla
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:25:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066626: fixed in lua-svn 0.4.0-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066626,
regarding lua-svn: FTBFS: src/luasvn.c:1306:13: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘svn_prop_needs_translation’ [-Werror=impli
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1068869 [mu4e] mu4e: Cannot open load file: No such file or directory, mu4e
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1068869: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068869
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2024-04-12, at 16:56:25 +0200, Clément Calmels wrote:
> Package: mu4e
> Version: 1.12.3-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I upgraded my Sid machine with the latest mu4e and maildir-utils
> packages : 1.12.3-2. Ema
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:19:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1049951: fixed in fwbuilder 5.3.7-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049951,
regarding fwbuilder: maintained by ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: mu4e
Version: 1.12.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I upgraded my Sid machine with the latest mu4e and maildir-utils
packages : 1.12.3-2. Emacs isn't able to find the mu4e command
anymore. From *Messages*: "Cannot open load file: No such file o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1052197 xorgxrdp
Bug #1052197 {Done: Gürkan Myczko } [xrdp] xrdp: after
bullseye-security upgrade, empty turquoise screen after logging in
Bug reassigned from package 'xrdp' to 'xorgxrdp'.
No longer marked as found in versions xrdp/0.9.2
reassign 1052197 xorgxrdp
affects 1052197 xrdp
found 1052197 1:0.2.12-1
fixed 1052197 1:0.2.12-1+deb11u1
fixed 1052197 1:0.9.19-1
thanks
Gürkan Myczko dixit:
> This bug has been closed upstream, and upstream packages have been in
> the archive for a while.
No, the bug has been fixed by binNMUing
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 14:37:16 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> What is that “GUI” view? src:cryptsetup doesn't provide that, I wonder
> if it might be what needs libphtread.
FWIW, I later noticed you used a splash screen (plymouth) and thought it
might be because of that, but I still cannot repro
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:09:33 + Graham Inggs wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Hi Maintainer
>
> While asserting that no warnings are raised is a useful test for the
> upstream developers, I don't think it makes sense for downstreams.
>
> I propose to disable the assertion as follows:
>
> -
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #1068849 [cryptsetup-initramfs] cryptsetup: Fails to unlock the filesystem
with missing libgcc_s.so.1
Bug #1068848 [cryptsetup-initramfs] cryptsetup: Fails to unlock the filesystem
with missing libgcc_s.so.1
Added tag(s) unrepro
Control: tag -1 + unreproducible moreinfo
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 12:45:09 +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> Just FYI (for upstream code): if cryptsetup/libcryptsetup is linked with
> OpenSSL >= 3.2,
> it does not need libphtread (as threads are implemented in OpenSSL for Argon2
> internally).
Thanks f
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 14:00, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Can you tell us which part was wanting libgcc_s.so.1?
> cryptsetup in the initramfs doesn't seem to be the (original)
> problem of that.
How would I find out? (I've never debugged such a problem, and have
basically no clue what is happenin
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:11:51AM +0200, Jan Katins wrote:
> Package: cryptsetup
> Version: 2:2.7.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> After a recent apt upgrade on a debian sid system (installed about 3
> years ago with an installer, choosing to encrypt the filesystem, no
> idea what
Processing control commands:
> severity 1062383 important
Bug #1062383 [src:dolfinx-mpc] dolfinx-mpc: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t
transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tags 1062383 moreinfo
Bug #1062383 [src:dolfinx-mpc] dolfinx-mpc: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t
transition
Added t
Source: dolfinx-mpc
Followup-For: Bug #1062383
Control: severity 1062383 important
Control: tags 1062383 moreinfo
This patch was never applied. Do we not need it after all? Can we
close this bug now?
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:21:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1067294: fixed in python-pomegranate 0.14.8-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067294,
regarding python-pomegranate: autopkgtest regression with NumPy 1.26
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:21:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1067233: fixed in python-pomegranate 0.14.8-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067233,
regarding python-pomegranate: autopkgtest regression with NumPy 1.26
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:21:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066854: fixed in ruby-magic 0.2.9-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066854,
regarding don't hard-code the name of the shared library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1067294 in python-pomegranate reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pomegranate/-/comm
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1067294 [src:python-pomegranate] python-pomegranate: FTBFS: dh_auto_test:
error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned
exit code 13
Bug #1067233 [src:python-pomegranate] python-pomegranate: autopkgtest
regressi
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1067233 [src:python-pomegranate] python-pomegranate: autopkgtest
regression with NumPy 1.26
Bug #1067294 [src:python-pomegranate] python-pomegranate: FTBFS: dh_auto_test:
error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" retu
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1067233 in python-pomegranate reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pomegranate/-/comm
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1066854 in ruby-magic reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-magic/-/commit/3a95d42fa6ea9355487927f2
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1066854 [src:ruby-magic] don't hard-code the name of the shared library
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1066854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066854
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> severity 1062587 important
Bug #1062587 [src:fenics-dolfinx] fenics-dolfinx: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t
transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tags 1062587 moreinfo
Bug #1062587 [src:fenics-dolfinx] fenics-dolfinx: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t
transi
Source: fenics-dolfinx
Followup-For: Bug #1062587
Control: severity 1062587 important
Control: tags 1062587 moreinfo
This time_t patch was never applied. I presume it's not needed after
all and we can close this bug now?
On 4/12/24 9:11 AM, Jan Katins wrote:
I snooped around in the source code a bit and found that libgcc_s
seems to be dlopened and is special cased:
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/blob/master/hook-functions?ref_type=heads#L248-249
(original bugreport:
https://bugs.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1066223 [src:ftpcopy] ftpcopy: FTBFS: conftest1663576.c:7:9: error:
implicit declaration of function ‘_exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1066223: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066223
Deb
Followup-For: Bug #1066223
X-Debbugs-Cc: Bastian Germann
Control: tag -1 pending
Hi Bastian,
I've fixed the remaining implicit function declarations and related bugs
in GIT. Do you want to take it from here again?
We should probably fix the nonverbose build in this very special build
system, too
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1064531 [src:amberol] src:amberol: unsatisfied build dependency in
testing: librust-lofty-0.17-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1064531: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064531
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
On 2024-02-23 08:33, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
> build dependency.
It's actually two build deps that are missing: librust-lofty-0.17-dev
and librust-mpris-server-0.6-dev. Setting both to the versions cu
Hi,
In ubuntu we applied the upstream's fix at
https://github.com/rlancaste/stellarsolver/pull/139. I adapted it to a
patch that I attach here for fixing this FTBFS.
I am sending this for your consideration, and I hope it helps.
Best,
Miriam
--
[image: Canonical-20th-anniversary]
Miriam Espa
Hi,
In ubuntu we applied the upstream's fix at
https://github.com/jedsoft/slrn/pull/1 (with some refreshing action) that
I'll attach here for fixing this FTBFS.
I am sending this for your consideration, and I hope that it helps.
Best,
Miriam
--
[image: Canonical-20th-anniversary]
Miriam Esp
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:51:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068115: fixed in tardy 1.25-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1068115,
regarding tardy: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}:
./tardy/main.cc:282:(.text.startup+0x578): undefined reference to
`tardy_mtime(long)'
to be mark
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:51:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066651: fixed in spectools 201601r1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066651,
regarding spectools: FTBFS: wispy_hw_gen1.c:296:15: error: implicit declaration
of function ‘wispy24x_adler_checksum’; did you
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/PythonOT/POT/issues/618
Bug #1068647 [src:python-pot] python-pot: autopkgtest regression on i386 with
NumPy 1.26.4
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/PythonOT/POT/issues/618'.
--
1068647: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/PythonOT/POT/issues/618
Thanks for the bug report.
This seems like a simple case of a missing floating point tolerance in
upstream's test. It's easy to patch, but I've sent a reproducible
example upstream [1] as they're likely to have better insight into t
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:35:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1065980: fixed in gfarm 2.7.20+dfsg-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065980,
regarding gfarm: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}:
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 1068849 1068848
Bug #1068849 [cryptsetup] cryptsetup: Fails to unlock the filesystem with
missing libgcc_s.so.1
Bug #1068848 [cryptsetup] cryptsetup: Fails to unlock the filesystem with
missing libgcc_s.so.1
Merged 1068848 1068849
> reassi
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug #1067957 [src:maude] FTBFS: error: call of overloaded
‘__gmp_expr(__time64_t&)’ is ambiguous
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious'
--
1067957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067957
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi,
maude has been -rm'ed on 32-bit archs as per
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068766
So this issue is now moot and I am downgrading the severity.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:53:08AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at
Control: tags 1065980 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for gfarm (versioned as 2.7.20+dfsg-1.2). The diff
is attached to this message.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
diff -Nru gfarm-2.7.20+dfsg/debian/changelog gfarm-2.7.20+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- gfarm-2.7.20+dfsg/debian/changelo
Processing control commands:
> tags 1065980 + patch
Bug #1065980 [src:gfarm] gfarm: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}:
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1065980 to the same tags previously set
--
1065980: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065980
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@b
Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 07:34:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1065778: fixed in libcdio 2.1.0-4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065778,
regarding libcdio: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: _cdio_stdio.c:53:20: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘fseeko64’; did you mean ‘fse
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1068811 {Done: Bdale Garbee } [camv-rnd] camv-rnd:
hardcoded librnd4 dependency
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked
control: reopen -1
control: notifxed -1 1.1.4-2
control: severity -1 serious
there is one left...
Package: camv-rnd-export-vector
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, camv-rnd-core (=
${binary:Version}), librnd4
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, camv-rnd
Processing control commands:
> tags 1065778 + patch
Bug #1065778 [src:libcdio] libcdio: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: _cdio_stdio.c:53:20:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘fseeko64’; did you mean ‘fseeko’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1065778 to t
Control: tags 1065778 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libcdio (versioned as 2.1.0-4.2). The diff
is attached to this message.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
diff -Nru libcdio-2.1.0/debian/changelog libcdio-2.1.0/debian/changelog
--- libcdio-2.1.0/debian/changelog 2024-02-29 11:3
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1068810 {Done: Bdale Garbee } [sch-rnd] sch-rnd: hardcoded
librnd4 dependency
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1068810 to the same values
previously set
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1068810 [sch-rnd] sch-rnd: hardcoded libr
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1068812 [pcb-rnd] pcb-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency
Bug 1068812 is not marked as done; doing nothing.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1068812 [pcb-rnd] pcb-rnd: hardcoded librnd4 dependency
Severity set to 'serious' from 'minor'
--
1068812: https://bu
control: reopen -1
control: severity -1 serious
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:17:44 -0600 Bdale Garbee wrote:
The librnd4 runtime dependency is needed to ensure at least a minimum
version of that library is available so required capability is present.
The "hard coded" dependency is not actually a bug,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 05:12:36PM +0800, i...@0w.al wrote:
> I have changed the compat version from 5 to 13 to fix the build error, and
> fixed some lintian warnings
Hello. As the package is orphaned, it's not very useful to send patches to
its bug reports unless you want to do the upload yoursel
97 matches
Mail list logo
