Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:51:31 +0000
with message-id <e1rvdzd-00epyf...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1066651: fixed in spectools 201601r1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066651,
regarding spectools: FTBFS: wispy_hw_gen1.c:296:15: error: implicit declaration
of function ‘wispy24x_adler_checksum’; did you mean ‘wispy1_adler_checksum’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1066651: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066651
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: spectools
Version: 201601r1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_DEBUG -I./ -g -O2
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=.
> -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat
> -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c spectool_net_server.c -o
> spectool_net_server.o
> wispy_hw_dbx.c: In function ‘wispydbx_usb_setposition’:
> wispy_hw_dbx.c:1289:27: warning: assignment to ‘uint8_t *’ {aka ‘unsigned
> char *’} from incompatible pointer type ‘wispydbx_rfsettings_v2 *’ {aka
> ‘struct _wispydbx_rfsettings_v2 *’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> 1289 | use_rfset = &rfset2;
> | ^
> wispy_hw_dbx.c:1312:27: warning: assignment to ‘uint8_t *’ {aka ‘unsigned
> char *’} from incompatible pointer type ‘wispydbx_rfsettings *’ {aka ‘struct
> _wispydbx_rfsettings *’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> 1312 | use_rfset = &rfset;
> | ^
> spectool_net_client.c: In function ‘spectool_netcli_block_sweep’:
> spectool_net_client.c:367:62: warning: format ‘%u’ expects argument of type
> ‘unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat=]
> 367 | snprintf(errstr, SPECTOOL_ERROR_MAX, "Got
> sweep frame too small to hold "
> |
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> spectool_net_client.c:368:99: note: format string is defined here
> 368 | "indicated number of
> samples, bailing - %u samples %u < %u",
> |
> ~^
> |
> |
> |
> unsigned int
> |
> %lu
> wispy_hw_gen1.c: In function ‘wispy1_usb_init_path’:
> wispy_hw_gen1.c:296:15: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘wispy24x_adler_checksum’; did you mean ‘wispy1_adler_checksum’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 296 | cid = wispy24x_adler_checksum(combopath, 128);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | wispy1_adler_checksum
> ubertooth_hw_u1.c: In function ‘ubertooth_u1_device_scan’:
> ubertooth_hw_u1.c:266:41: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘wispy24x_adler_checksum’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 266 |
> wispy24x_adler_checksum(combopath, 128);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> spectool_net_client.c:426:17: warning: ignoring return value of ‘write’
> declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
> 426 | write(((spectool_net_dev_aux *)
> (sni->phydev->auxptr))->spipe[1], "0", 1);
> |
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> wispy_hw_gen1.c: In function ‘wispy1_usb_open’:
> wispy_hw_gen1.c:557:21: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘wispy24x_usb_detach_hack’; did you mean ‘wispy_usb_detach_hack’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 557 | if (wispy24x_usb_detach_hack(auxptr->devhdl, 0,
> phydev->errstr) < 0) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | wispy_usb_detach_hack
> spectool_net_client.c: In function ‘spectool_netcli_enabledev’:
> spectool_net_client.c:517:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘pipe’
> declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
> 517 | pipe(aux->spipe);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> spectool_net_client.c: In function ‘spectool_net_poll’:
> spectool_net_client.c:634:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘read’
> declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
> 634 | read(((spectool_net_dev_aux *) phydev->auxptr)->spipe[0],
> junk, 8);
> |
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> spectool_raw.c: In function ‘main’:
> spectool_raw.c:320:29: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘spectool_netcli_writepoll’; did you mean ‘spectool_netcli_poll’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 320 | if (spectool_netcli_writepoll(&sr, errstr) <
> 0) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | spectool_netcli_poll
> spectool_raw.c:376:48: warning: too many arguments for format
> [-Wformat-extra-args]
> 376 | printf("Configured device %u
> (%s)\n",
> |
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ubertooth_hw_u1.c:259:61: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated
> writing up to 4096 bytes into a region of size 64 [-Wformat-truncation=]
> 259 | snprintf(auxpair->bus, 64, "%s",
> bus->dirname);
> | ^~
> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:906,
> from ubertooth_hw_u1.c:16:
> In function ‘snprintf’,
> inlined from ‘ubertooth_u1_device_scan’ at ubertooth_hw_u1.c:259:5:
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:54:10: note: ‘__builtin_snprintf’
> output between 1 and 4097 bytes into a destination of size 64
> 54 | return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 55 | __glibc_objsize (__s), __fmt,
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 56 | __va_arg_pack ());
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ubertooth_hw_u1.c: In function ‘ubertooth_u1_device_scan’:
> ubertooth_hw_u1.c:260:61: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated
> writing up to 4096 bytes into a region of size 64 [-Wformat-truncation=]
> 260 | snprintf(auxpair->dev, 64, "%s",
> dev->filename);
> | ^~
> In function ‘snprintf’,
> inlined from ‘ubertooth_u1_device_scan’ at ubertooth_hw_u1.c:260:5:
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:54:10: note: ‘__builtin_snprintf’
> output between 1 and 4097 bytes into a destination of size 64
> 54 | return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 55 | __glibc_objsize (__s), __fmt,
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 56 | __va_arg_pack ());
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> wispy_hw_24x.c: In function ‘wispy24x_usb_device_scan’:
> wispy_hw_24x.c:274:61: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated
> writing up to 4096 bytes into a region of size 64 [-Wformat-truncation=]
> 274 | snprintf(auxpair->bus, 64, "%s",
> bus->dirname);
> | ^~
> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:906,
> from wispy_hw_24x.c:17:
> In function ‘snprintf’,
> inlined from ‘wispy24x_usb_device_scan’ at wispy_hw_24x.c:274:5:
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:54:10: note: ‘__builtin_snprintf’
> output between 1 and 4097 bytes into a destination of size 64
> 54 | return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 55 | __glibc_objsize (__s), __fmt,
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 56 | __va_arg_pack ());
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> wispy_hw_24x.c: In function ‘wispy24x_usb_device_scan’:
> wispy_hw_24x.c:275:61: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated
> writing up to 4096 bytes into a region of size 64 [-Wformat-truncation=]
> 275 | snprintf(auxpair->dev, 64, "%s",
> dev->filename);
> | ^~
> In function ‘snprintf’,
> inlined from ‘wispy24x_usb_device_scan’ at wispy_hw_24x.c:275:5:
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:54:10: note: ‘__builtin_snprintf’
> output between 1 and 4097 bytes into a destination of size 64
> 54 | return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 55 | __glibc_objsize (__s), __fmt,
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 56 | __va_arg_pack ());
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> gcc -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_DEBUG -I./ -g -O2
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=.
> -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat
> -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c spectool_curses.c -o
> spectool_curses.o
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:97: ubertooth_hw_u1.o] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/spectools_201601r1-3_unstable.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: spectools
Source-Version: 201601r1-4
Done: Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
spectools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 1066...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> (supplier of updated spectools package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:37:25 +0200
Source: spectools
Architecture: source
Version: 201601r1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org>
Closes: 1066651
Changes:
spectools (201601r1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* QA upload.
* Import package history into GIT.
* Fix building with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration.
(Closes: #1066651)
* Declare Rules-Requires-Root: no.
Checksums-Sha1:
430a0bf3d005db3a8800e7c5463ad11eb1d223b4 1878 spectools_201601r1-4.dsc
7b0beb9ab61fcdc8054f705a6e3efe7c08b69bf9 10172
spectools_201601r1-4.debian.tar.xz
a3e0104442ccb95b7579b674a794e5135ff1072a 5812
spectools_201601r1-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
cde90c776204d3003184b6fbf3e53aeb9ea4af0e33ecc516d8f5c73c800cf199 1878
spectools_201601r1-4.dsc
f5fdd204baa4c445e60f22cec1858542ce6bc7d17c86213f93c2fdaa83d44011 10172
spectools_201601r1-4.debian.tar.xz
77698377b1abf9a620e983ee44b8d9be397a7c8734343fced738f6b1af05a0a3 5812
spectools_201601r1-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
54e1aa48a247edfa7b6143f77b9539bf 1878 electronics optional
spectools_201601r1-4.dsc
ef9bf40adc72ad26cfde16d9f8724309 10172 electronics optional
spectools_201601r1-4.debian.tar.xz
174cecbb87d51c012a698a92d2b0bf7f 5812 electronics optional
spectools_201601r1-4_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=h9iT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpD8mmV9zKyJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
