close 590394 0.16.999.49898-1
thanks
--
Albin Tonnerre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 590394 0.16.999.49898-1
Bug#590394: e17: FTBFS: No package 'ecore-job' found
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.16.999.49898-1, send any further explanations
to Lucas Nu
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:02:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590481: fixed in python-numpy 1:1.4.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #590481,
regarding python-numpy: FTBFS on alpha: error: storage size of 'ux' isn't known
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 586160 + pending
Bug #586160 [src:fte] fte: Didn't build fte-console on some architecture
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
586160: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
tags 586160 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for fte (version 0.50.2-1.2) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2.
Please see changelog for more details.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
fte-0.50.2-1.2.debd
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 586160 serious
Bug #586160 [src:fte] fte: Didn't build fte-console on some architecture
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
586160: http://bugs.debi
Hi Jörg,
On Do, 12 Nov 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> This new version of Xindy contains a bug. It merges entries with numbers.
> This causes wrong/missing entries in the index of a document and hence,
> this version should not go into testing aka the next release. But it
> should stay in untable to g
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * We decided to refer to the Release Team the question as to
>whether the package is releaseable in its current state.
>
> So, we would appreciate it if you would take a look at this situation
> and decide. When you've decided you should probably set
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 562945 runit-run
Bug #562945 [tech-ctte] fails to install
Bug #574223 [tech-ctte] runit-run: installation fails
Bug reassigned from package 'tech-ctte' to 'runit-run'.
Bug reassigned from package 'tech-ctte' to 'runit-run'.
> thanks
Stopp
severity 558999 important
thanks
On 27.07.2010 18:30, Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi,
maybe we should try gcc -mlong-calls on java-gnome and/or gtk+?
I can do as soon as I have access to my own machine where I have a key
to the Debian hppa porter box.
I confirm that that adding -mlong-calls to CFL
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 558999 important
Bug #558999 [gcc-4.4] FTBFS [hppa] - recompile with -ffunction-sections
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
558999: http://bugs.deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 589459 gcj-4.4
Bug #589459 [gcj-jdk] vtk: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error:
'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Bug reassigned from package 'gcj-jdk' to 'gcj-4.4'.
> tag 589459 + pending
Bug #589459 [gcj-4.4] vtk: FTBFS on kfreebs
Your message dated Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:02:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590320: fixed in minitube 1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590320,
regarding Please upload a git > 20010-07-25 commit to fix Y0utube interface
change
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:32:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590343: fixed in python-csa 0.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590343,
regarding python-csa: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named numpy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
* Lucas Nussbaum , 2009-12-11, 09:09:
c++ -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -fPIC -pipe -fno-implicit-templates -I.
-I/build/user-singular_3-0-4-3.dfsg-3-amd64-aEMvZn/singular-3-0-4-3.dfsg/debian/tmp//usr/include/singular/
-I/build/user-singular_3-0-4-3.dfsg-3-amd64-aEMvZn/singular-3-0-4-3.dfsg/debian/tmp//
* Lucas Nussbaum , 2010-06-03, 11:57:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary
test -x debian/rules
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs -A
mkdir -p "."
if test -e /usr/share/misc/config.guess ; then \
for i in ./config.guess ; do \
if ! test -e $i.cdbs-ori
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:49:59 -0400
with message-id <20100727224959.ga21...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Closing again with versioning
has caused the Debian Bug report #571571,
regarding a2ps: Please update Build-Depends emacs22 to emacs23
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:47:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#568291: fixed in gmime2.2 2.2.25-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #568291,
regarding possible buffer overflows
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:04:22PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 04/06/10 19:37, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Do GNOME maintainers plan to include gmime2.2 in Squeeze or will it
> > dropped in favour of gmime2.4?
>
> I've dropped the Mono bindings in our svn. The C library still has f
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:34:50 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> > But versioning seems to follow a scheme: 1.2xy is unstable if and only
> > if x is odd. That should be something we can filter on. We should make
> > sure upstream really uses this system before though.
> Well spotted! Thanks. This
On 27 July 2010 22:18, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> But versioning seems to follow a scheme: 1.2xy is unstable if and only
> if x is odd. That should be something we can filter on. We should make
> sure upstream really uses this system before though.
Well spotted! Thanks. This is true.
http://sf.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 590224
Bug #590224 {Done: Piotr Ożarowski } [python-sqlalchemy]
python-sqlalchemy: sqlalchemy crashes on import
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
reopen 590224
thanks
should be fixed in python-defaults 2.6.5-10
Well, it's not fixed. Having up-to-date python-default, I installed
python-sqlalchemy 0.6.3-1 and got this:
$ python2.5 -c 'import sqlalchemy.orm.exc'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "/usr/lib
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:42:42 +0200
with message-id <20100727204242.ga...@jwilk.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#560550: dnsproxy: FTBFS: dnsproxy.c:63: undefined
reference to `event_gotsig'
has caused the Debian Bug report #560550,
regarding dnsproxy: FTBFS: dnsproxy.c:63: undefined r
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:34:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590373: fixed in stardict 3.0.1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #590373,
regarding stardict: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libestools1.2-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Hi,
Jeffrey Ratcliffe writes:
> Looking further, I see the download page puts 'unstable' fairly
> clearly on the appropriate entries:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtk2-perl/files/
>
> I'm not a uscan wiz - can you think how to use this to filter them out?
As far as I know, uscan does not
Package: xmedcon
Version: 0.10.5-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
xmedcon FTBFS on mips and mipsel with linker errors. From the mips
build log:
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link mips-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -lm -o
xmedcon xcolmap.o xcolgbc.o xdefs.o xicons.o xerror.o xextract.o xfancy.o
xfil
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 590350 + unreproducible
Bug #590350 [src:flasm] flasm: FTBFS: assembler.tab.c:132:1: error:
unterminated #ifndef
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
>
End of message, stop
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:45:48 +0200
with message-id <20100727194548.ga4...@debian.org>
and subject line Bug #590029: fixed in 0.7.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590029,
regarding remmina-plugin-rdp: this plugin causes remmina to crash
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On 27 July 2010 19:31, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> I'll talk to upstream about maybe rearranging things so that the tools
>> can distinguish between unstable and stable.
>
> Cool, thanks!
> Let's wait for the outcome before making any further decisions, ok?
Looking further, I see the download page
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 590408 + pending
Bug #590408 [src:pilot-qof] pilot-qof: FTBFS: /usr/bin/install: cannot stat
`./html/*.gif': No such file or directory
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
59
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:32:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590594: fixed in dbus 1.2.24-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #590594,
regarding dbus: FTBFS with "dh_link: link destination
debian/dbus-1-dbg/usr/share/doc/dbus-1-dbg is a directory" if dh-buildinfo is
ins
2010/7/27 Luca Falavigna :
> 0.7.3 is now in unstable, mind trying again with that version?
Yep, freerdp 0.7.3-1 fixes the problem for me.
I don't have an RDP server handy to test that it actually works, but
now remmina doesn't crash anymore (with remmina-plugin-rdp installed).
Thanks for the qu
Hi Guillem,
Thanks for your comment, which brings me to say the following.
As you wrote, either test the first patch again and include libkvm-dev
or try with the second patch that builds with -linux.c, otherwise
simply keep the project off from building for kbsd.
For your information, the -linux
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 08:41 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part:
> > gcc -Wall -g -DCONFIG_PATH=\"/etc/flasm.ini\" -O2 -c -o assembler.tab.o
> > assembler.tab.c
> > assembler.tab.c:132:1: error: unterminated #ifndef
> > assembler.tab.c:325: error: expected ',' or '}' at end of input
>
from
http://people.skolelinux.org/~pere/debian-upgrade-testing//test-20100727-lenny-squeeze-gnome-aptitude.txt
>.
This seem to be caused by a missing conflicts/replaces statement for
the update-notifier package.
See also #590604 for another issue caused by this error.
Happy hackin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 575742
Bug #575742 {Done: Arne Wichmann } [libmikmod] CVE-2009-3995
CVE-2009-3996: Multiple heap-based buffer overflows
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed ve
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 04:30:42PM +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote:
> I prepared the appended patch as an NMU, it will be uploaded to delayed/2
> by a...@debian.org soon.
Upstream's patch turned out to be incomplete/wrong, I'll upload an
updated version.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:48:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590417: fixed in scim-chewing 0.3.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #590417,
regarding scim-chewing: FTBFS: libtool: link: cannot find the library
`/usr/lib/libltdl.la' or unhandled argument `/usr/lib/liblt
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 08:03:49PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> reassign 556393 gvfs
> forcemerge 548336 556393
> thanks
>
> Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> > Package: gedit
> > Version: 2.28.2-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> >
> > When trying to sta
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:43:51 -0400
with message-id <20100727184350.ga7...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: This is not a bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #569148,
regarding does not verify that hostname of destination and common name in
certificate match
to be marked
0.7.3 is now in unstable, mind trying again with that version?
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 590594 -1
Bug#590594: dbus: FTBFS with "dh_link: link destination
debian/dbus-1-dbg/usr/share/doc/dbus-1-dbg is a directory" if dh-buildinfo is
installed
Bug 590594 cloned as bug 590601.
> reassign 590594 dbus
Bug #590594 [dh-buildinfo] d
clone 590594 -1
reassign 590594 dbus
found 590594 1.2.24-1+exp1
reassign -1 cdbs
retitle -1 should run dh_buildinfo only on request, and/or after dh_installdocs
found -1 0.4.71
thanks
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 at 19:16:32 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> reassign 590594 dh-buildinfo
I don't think this is
On 27.07.2010 19:16, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> $ ls -alF debian/dbus-1-dbg/usr/share/doc/dbus-1-dbg
>> total 8
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 abe abe 512 Jul 27 18:19 ./
>> drwxr-xr-x 3 abe abe 512 Jul 27 18:19 ../
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 abe abe 2321 Jul 27 18:19 buildinfo.gz
>> $
>>
>> Adding a Build-Conflicts on dh-
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:11:55 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> On 27 July 2010 16:18, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > What make me a bit unhappy about that is uscan will again show us
> > 1.230 if they are in the same directory (and use the same
> > filename/versioning scheme).
> I'll talk to upstream
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # severity change crossed with the reassign, so moving it back
> severity 590594 serious
Bug #590594 [dh-buildinfo] dbus: FTBFS with "dh_link: link destination
debian/dbus-1-dbg/usr/share/doc/dbus-1-dbg is a directory" if dh-buildinfo is
install
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # missing build conflicts are not RC
> severity 590594 important
Bug #590594 [dh-buildinfo] dbus: FTBFS with "dh_link: link destination
debian/dbus-1-dbg/usr/share/doc/dbus-1-dbg is a directory" if dh-buildinfo is
installed
Severity set to 'impo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 590594 dh-buildinfo
Bug #590594 [dbus] dbus: FTBFS with "dh_link: link destination
debian/dbus-1-dbg/usr/share/doc/dbus-1-dbg is a directory" if dh-buildinfo is
installed
Bug reassigned from package 'dbus' to 'dh-buildinfo'.
Bug No long
reassign 590594 dh-buildinfo
found 590594 0.9
thanks
On 27.07.2010 19:01, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Package: dbus
> Version: 1.2.24-2
> Severity: serious
>
> For testing the fix for http://bugs.debian.org/589662, I built the
> patched version on my own kfreebsd-i386 box where it FTBFS with the
> foll
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:10:43 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id
and subject line Re: gettext: new upstream release 0.18 available
has caused the Debian Bug report #581637,
regarding gettext 0.18-1 breaks packages using autopoint still having cvs in
build-depends
to be marked as done.
T
Hi.
When fixing #567770 please fix #572465 as well.
This is just to tell that I'm skipping the NMU for Bug#572465
because the package would still be unsuitable for release.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Package: dbus
Version: 1.2.24-2
Severity: serious
For testing the fix for http://bugs.debian.org/589662, I built the
patched version on my own kfreebsd-i386 box where it FTBFS with the
following error message:
dh_link -pdbus-1-dbg
dh_link: link destination debian/dbus-1-dbg/usr/share/doc/dbus-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 581637 by 572465
Bug #581637 [gettext] gettext 0.18-1 breaks packages using autopoint still
having cvs in build-depends
Was blocked by: 572465 572471
Removed blocking bug(s) of 581637: 572465
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
The two-liner patch can easilly be applied to gcc-4.4.4 and it seems to work.
It is already included in gcc-4.5 .
--
Marcos Marado
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
(Resending, this time with correct email address. Doh. --Dirk)
Dear MIPSers,
I am in need of some help here -- r-base stopped building with tcl/tk
support, and this now trickles down to R packages using tcl/tk (which fail,
as in this FTBFS).
There was no change whatsoever at R, and other arches
Dear MIPSers,
I am in need of some help here -- r-base stopped building with tcl/tk
support, and this now trickles down to R packages using tcl/tk (which fail,
as in this FTBFS).
There was no change whatsoever at R, and other arches continue to work.
I can accomodate things, but I would need a
Hi,
maybe we should try gcc -mlong-calls on java-gnome and/or gtk+?
I can do as soon as I have access to my own machine where I have a key
to the Debian hppa porter box.
bye,
Roland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:02:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590273: fixed in phasex 0.12.0~pre1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #590273,
regarding phasex: FTBFS: wrong -m$foo switches
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:26:47 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> If there anything I can do to help fix this in lenny, please
> don’t hesitate to let me know.
>
Nico Golde (cc:ed) said he'd upload the fix to p-u.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 590481 + pending
Bug #590481 [src:python-numpy] python-numpy: FTBFS on alpha: error: storage
size of 'ux' isn't known
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
590481: http://bugs.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 590026 git-core/1:1.5.6~rc0-1
Bug #590026 {Done: Jonathan Nieder } [git-core] git-core:
upstream fix for exploitable buffer overrun (CVE-2010-2542)
Bug Marked as found in versions git-core/1:1.5.6~rc0-1.
> # commit 1b0b962d
> # included (be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 590273 pending
Bug #590273 [src:phasex] phasex: FTBFS: wrong -m$foo switches
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
590273: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=5902
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:27:54 -0400
with message-id <1280244474.2004.176.ca...@workhorse>
and subject line Fixed in -5 upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #577873,
regarding illuminator: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -llapackgf-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 577873 0.11.0-4
Bug #577873 [src:illuminator] illuminator: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -llapackgf-3
The source illuminator and version do not appear to match any binary packages
Bug Marked as fixed in versions illuminator/0.11.0-4.
> fixed 55378
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 590026 + lenny squeeze sid
Bug #590026 {Done: Jonathan Nieder } [git-core] git-core:
upstream fix for exploitable buffer overrun (CVE-2010-2542)
Added tag(s) sid, squeeze, and lenny.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
tags 590026 + lenny squeeze sid
quit
Julien Cristau wrote:
> I ended up using the first patch from Jonathan after fixing my
> environment to have HOME exported, and I'll upload that in a minute.
Thanks!
If there anything I can do to help fix this in lenny, please
don’t hesitate to let me know.
On 27 July 2010 16:18, gregor herrmann wrote:
> What make me a bit unhappy about that is uscan will again show us
> 1.230 if they are in the same directory (and use the same
> filename/versioning scheme).
I'll talk to upstream about maybe rearranging things so that the tools
can distinguish betwe
- On one of my systems, i was unable to reproduce the bug with
python-defaults 2.6.5-5 and python-sqlalchemy 0.6.2-1
- On another one of my systems, i had the bug with python-defaults
2.6.5-5 and python-sqlalchemy 0.6.2-1. Upgrading to python-defaults
2.6.5-10 fixed the exception "ValueErro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 590566 normal
Bug #590566 [wpasupplicant] wpasupplicant: wpa authentication suddenly no
longer works on eeepc901
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> tags 590566 + moreinfo
Bug #590566 [wpasupplicant] wpasupplicant: wpa authenticatio
severity 590566 normal
tags 590566 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi
On Tuesday 27 July 2010, folkert wrote:
> Package: wpasupplicant
> Version: 0.6.10-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
wpasupplicant 0.6.10-2 is working fine over here, furthermore it's in
testing since march 11th
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:20:54 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> Upstream thinks that it is a new problem with Gtk2/Glib 1.230:
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-perl-list/2010-July/msg00012.html
> At the moment, there is no patch.
Thanks for checking!
> I'll test the new stable branches, but
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 590574 important
Bug #590574 [xserver-xorg-video-ati] [xserver-xorg-video-ati]
xserver-xorg-video-ati: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi->space_accounted'
failed
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 589459 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40816
Bug #589459 [gcj-jdk] vtk: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error:
'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
Hello Ralf, hello Loïc,
Thank you for the bugreport.
* Ralf Treinen [Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:07:24PM +0200]:
> Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
> (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
> slightly out of sync):
>
> /usr/bin/ecm
> /usr/s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 589459 gcj-jdk
Bug #589459 [src:vtk] vtk: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error:
'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded
Bug reassigned from package 'src:vtk' to 'gcj-jdk'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions vtk/5.6.0-2.
> thanks
St
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 589182 serious
Bug #589182 [libisc52] Installing libisc52 tries to overwrite files in libisc50
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
589182: http://bugs.
This is not a bug in VTK, this is a bug in GCC/GCJ:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40816
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 590561 important
Bug #590561 [calibre] calibre: Should depend on python-routes
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
590561: http://bugs.debian.org/cg
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:47:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590026: fixed in git 1:1.7.1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590026,
regarding git-core: upstream fix for exploitable buffer overrun (CVE-2010-2542)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 590026 + pending
Bug #590026 [git-core] git-core: upstream fix for exploitable buffer overrun
(CVE-2010-2542)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
590026: http://bugs.debian.
tags 590026 + pending
thanks
I ended up using the first patch from Jonathan after fixing my
environment to have HOME exported, and I'll upload that in a minute.
Gerrit, I'm uploading to ftp-master directly since afaik you're on VAC;
please find the NMU patch attached.
Thanks again for the fix, Jo
Looks similar to http://bugs.debian.org/558999
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello, Bastian. Sorry to bother you. I reopened this bug log because
it appears to be installable only on the amd64 architecture. I tried
to install it today on the i386 architecture and it failed with the
original symptoms. I have subscribed to this bug log; so there's no
need to CC me.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 553481
Bug #553481 {Done: Bastian Blank } [3270-common] 3270-common:
dependency problem
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> thanks
Stopping proces
On 26/07/10 at 02:53 -0500, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
> * Lucas Nussbaum [2010-07-26 08:48:43 +0200]:
>
> > Source: scribus-ng
> > Version: 1.3.7.dfsg~svn20100715-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: squeeze sid
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100725 qa-ftbfs
> > Just
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 0.6.10-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
entering incorrect passphrases returns immediately, entering the correct one
lets it sit there doing nothing (all from within networkmanager). none of the 2
dots become green
this problem occurs wit
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:20:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590514: fixed in haskell-pretty-show 1.1.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #590514,
regarding haskell-pretty-show: FTBFS: missing build dependency on happy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for guile-pg (versioned as 0.16-4.2) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/3. This fixes the info dir.gz problem which made the
previous NMU REJECTED. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay
it longer.
Regards.
--
/"\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731
\ /
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:19:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590358: fixed in pygobject 2.21.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590358,
regarding pygtk-codegen-2.0: exec: 11: /usr/bin/python2.5: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:19:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590358: fixed in pygobject 2.21.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590358,
regarding pygtk-codegen-2.0: exec: 11: /usr/bin/python2.5: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:19:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590358: fixed in pygobject 2.21.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590358,
regarding pygtk-codegen-2.0: exec: 11: /usr/bin/python2.5: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:19:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590358: fixed in pygobject 2.21.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590358,
regarding pygtk-codegen-2.0: exec: 11: /usr/bin/python2.5: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:19:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590358: fixed in pygobject 2.21.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590358,
regarding pygtk-codegen-2.0: exec: 11: /usr/bin/python2.5: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:19:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590358: fixed in pygobject 2.21.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590358,
regarding pygtk-codegen-2.0: exec: 11: /usr/bin/python2.5: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:19:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590358: fixed in pygobject 2.21.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590358,
regarding pygtk-codegen-2.0: exec: 11: /usr/bin/python2.5: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:19:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590358: fixed in pygobject 2.21.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590358,
regarding pygtk-codegen-2.0: exec: 11: /usr/bin/python2.5: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:19:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590358: fixed in pygobject 2.21.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590358,
regarding pygtk-codegen-2.0: exec: 11: /usr/bin/python2.5: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:19:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590358: fixed in pygobject 2.21.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590358,
regarding pygtk-codegen-2.0: exec: 11: /usr/bin/python2.5: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:19:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590358: fixed in pygobject 2.21.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590358,
regarding pygtk-codegen-2.0: exec: 11: /usr/bin/python2.5: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
