On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:20:54 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > Upstream thinks that it is a new problem with Gtk2/Glib 1.230: > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-perl-list/2010-July/msg00012.html > At the moment, there is no patch.
Thanks for checking! > I'll test the new stable branches, but I assume they are unaffected, > so I suggest that we upload these. Hm. What make me a bit unhappy about that is uscan will again show us 1.230 if they are in the same directory (and use the same filename/versioning scheme). And 1.230 is not yet in testing, so we now have an unstable version in unstable :) (Just some random morning thoughts.) > We would have to bump the epoch to > upload 1.222 over 1.230, wouldn't we? Either that, or use 1:1.230+is+really+1.220-1. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- BOFH excuse #76: Unoptimized hard drive
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature