Your message dated Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:48:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#565829: fixed in libdb-ruby 0.6.5-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #565829,
regarding libdb-ruby1.9: Please drop the dependency on ruby 1.9.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:17:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#560653: fixed in guile-1.8 1.8.7+1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #560653,
regarding guile-1.8: FTBFS: ERROR: file: "libtest-asmobs", message: "file not
found"
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
I've been able to test grub2 version 1.98~20100115-1 with reiserfs.
Both of my systems booted fine with the latest grub
* Code:*
$ apt-cache policy grub2
grub2:
Installed: 1.98~20100115-1
Candidate: 1.98~20100115-1
Version table:
1.98~experimental.20100111.1-1 0
1 http://ftp
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:32:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#562240: fixed in guile-1.6 1.6.8-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #562240,
regarding `strptime' implicitly converted to pointer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
-=| Cyril Brulebois, Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:45:33PM +0100 |=-
> Package: src:firebird2.5
> Version: 2.5.0.25784~ReleaseCandidate1.ds2-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
>
> Hi,
>
> your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-* in experimental
On Jan 18, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 13:17 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Jan 17, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Julian Hernandez Gomez wrote:
The only powerpc computer that I have (PS3) is the one that I'm
trying to install :(
I think someone reported that there were
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:13:47PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Full build logs at the usual place:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?suite=experimental&p=qtcreator
Why is buildd doing,
libqt4-dev: missing
Using default version 4:4.5.3-4
while Build-depends clearly specifi
Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20100117-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hppa
gcc-snapshot fails to build on hppa. From the most recent build attempt:
[...]
mv -f .deps/time.Tpo .deps/time.Plo
/bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile
/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 565860 0.4.4-1
Bug #565860 [src:qtractor] FTBFS - configure: error: JACK library not found
Bug Marked as found in versions qtractor/0.4.4-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Source: qtractor
Version: 0.4.3-2
Severity: serious
qtractor fails to build on non-x86. From a recent build attempt on hppa:
[...]
checking for main in -lX11... no
checking for main in -lXext... no
checking for round in -lm... no
configure: error: JACK library not found.
checking for main in -ljac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 558999 4.0.14-2
Bug #558999 [java-gnome] FTBFS [hppa] - recompile with -ffunction-sections
There is no source info for the package 'java-gnome' at version '4.0.14-2' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '4.0.14-2
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:27:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#560488: fixed in kwavecontrol 0.4.2-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #560488,
regarding kwavecontrol: FTBFS: kencryptiongroup.cpp:180: error: invalid
conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*'
to be marked a
Le mardi 19 janvier 2010 02:35:01, vous avez écrit :
> Package: broadcom-sta
> Version: broadcom-sta-common_5.10.91.9.3-3_all
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Could you please provide more information about the problem:
- Did you rebuild the initrd file as mentionn
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:32:36AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois was
heard to say:
> Only keeping the #include line is sufficient, I can't reproduce this
> issue double free issue.
Weird.
It looks like the build succeeded on all the release architectures, so
I think I might downgrade this so that
Hello,
Thank you for reporting.
I'll fix this weekend.
>>> In Message "Bug#565836: libfilesystem-ruby1.9: Please drop the dependency
>>> on ruby 1.9.0"
>>><20100119003439.ga16...@xanadu.blop.info>,
>>> Lucas Nussbaum said;
> Package: libfilesystem-ruby1.9
> Version: 0.5-3
> Severit
Cyril Brulebois (19/01/2010):
> I've asked some folks on #-kbsd to keep an eye on this bug in case
> they have some time to track it down. Hopefully you'll hear from one
> of us soonish.
Hrm, this is strange.
Given my previous observations about --debug, I tried adding a cout
call (cout << "foo"
Daniel Burrows (18/01/2010):
> OK, I can't see any sign of a double-free in either valgrind or
> libefence, which are usually pretty good about catching this sort of
> thing. Can you run something similar on FreeBSD and see what it says?
Sorry for the delay… (we just started building experimen
I ran "cp /usr/share/libtool/config/ltmain.sh ." before building the package
and it worked well. I don't know whether putting this command in the
debian/rules would be the right thing to do.
I'm not suggesting that the maintainer do this, merely noting it for other
people like me who want to w
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 565853 directfb
Bug #565853 [src:direcftb] src:direcftb: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: missing
libdirectfb_ati128.so
Warning: Unknown package 'src:direcftb'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:direcftb' to 'directfb'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:02:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#564392: fixed in xsp 2.4.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #564392,
regarding xsp: FTBFS: Failed to open '/usr/lib/pkgconfig/mono-nunit.pc': No
such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: src:direcftb
Version: 1.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-* in experimental:
| dh_install -a -Nlibdirectfb-1.4-0-udeb -Nlibdirectfb-bin-udeb
--sourcedir=/build/buildd-directfb_1.4.1-2-kfre
Package: src:atlas
Version: 3.8.3-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 in experimental:
| make[1]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-atlas_3.8.3-7-kfreebsd-i386-q3vE7D/atlas-3.8.3'
| if test -n "sse3"
Package: snd:soundkonverter
Version: 1.0.0~alpha1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on (at least) kfreebsd-* in experimental:
| /usr/bin/g++-g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -Woverloaded-virtual
-fno-threadsafe-statics -fvi
Package: libredcloth-ruby1.9
Version: 4.2.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /u
Package: libncurses-ruby1.9
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /us
Package: libnokogiri-ruby1.9
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /u
Package: libdb-ruby1.9
Version: 0.6.5-5
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr/lib
Package: libusb-ruby1.9
Version: 0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr/lib/
Package: libtokyocabinet-ruby1.9
Version: 1.29-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in
Package: libsqlite3-ruby1.9
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /us
Package: libmecab-ruby1.9
Version: 0.98-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr/l
Package: libkrb5-ruby1.9
Version: 0.7-1+b1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr/
Package: libfilesystem-ruby1.9
Version: 0.5-3
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /u
Package: rrdtool-dbg
Version: 1.3.8-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr/lib/r
Package: libhpricot-ruby1.9
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /us
Package: libfcgi-ruby1.9
Version: 0.8.7-4.1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr
Package: libcairo-ruby1.9
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr/
Package: libdpkg-ruby1.9
Version: 0.3.5
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr/lib
Package: libstfl-ruby1.9
Version: 0.21-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr/li
Package: libaugeas-ruby1.9
Version: 0.2.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr
Package: libinotify-ruby1.9
Version: 0.0.2-3
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /us
Package: libpgsql-ruby1.9
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr/
Package: libexif-ruby1.9
Version: 0.1.2-14
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr/
On 18/01/10 at 23:59 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: src:ruby1.9.1
> > Version: 1.9.1.378-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > ruby1.9.1 FTBFS on sparc with the following error:
> > > make[2]: Leaving directory
> > >
Package: libmysql-ruby1.9
Version: 2.8.1-1+b1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /u
Package: libgpgme-ruby1.9
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr/
Package: librrd-ruby1.9
Version: 1.3.8-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some files in /usr/li
Package: libmapscript-ruby1.9
Version: 5.6.0+final-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby190transition
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.0 is going away in Squeeze, replaced by Ruby 1.9.1. This
transition is made mandatory by API changes upstream.
Your package currently ships some file
Package: zlib1g
Version: 1:1.2.3.5.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: ABI break?
Hi,
context: kfreebsd-* experimental buildds were not properly configured
and pulled more stuff from experimental than actually needed. We started
to see many FTBFSes (in particular on kfreebsd-amd64) due to:
-
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: src:ruby1.9.1
> Version: 1.9.1.378-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> ruby1.9.1 FTBFS on sparc with the following error:
> > make[2]: Leaving directory
> > `/build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.1.378-1-sparc-KMvrBv/ruby1.9.1-1.9.1.3
I have many good quality lists at decent prices. Drop me a line here:
rodney.bull...@highpowerlists.net
I'll get you all the details and samples.
To invoke no further correspondence status please send an email to
disapp...@highpowerlists.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-r
Many of these lists are on sale too. Just email me here:
louisa.cor...@highpowerlists.net
to be ramoved from our list please email disapp...@highpowerlists.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
Package: src:samhain
Version: 2.5.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-* in experimental, apparently because of
a bad detection of pthread stuff:
| gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./include -O2 -D_FORTIFY_S
Hello,
I would just like to add that I am continuing the development
of a better NMU-patch. At the moment I have incorporated 'ucf'
in order to update the configuration file '/etc/iog.cfg' properly.
The outcome is truly pleasing.
I have not yet finalized the best method to make a call to 'debconf
Package: src:ghc6
Version: 6.12.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFs on kfreebsd-i386 in experimental:
| /usr/bin/ar: creating compiler/stage2/build/libHSghc-6.12.1.a
| "inplace/bin/mkdirhier" ghc/stage2/build/tmp/
Package: broadcom-sta
Version: broadcom-sta-common_5.10.91.9.3-3_all
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The build wl-module dont works with a bcm4312 card. The interface is not found.
The problem exists since upgrading from broadcom-sta-common_5.10.91.9.3-2_all
to broadcom-
Hey,
is there any news about this? Last message is ten days old. I know this
is about experimental, but still, it'd be nice if it was fixed at one
point.
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: src:supertux
Version: 0.3.0~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS badly on kfreebsd, but that may very well be due to
the switch to a later gcc versions, which rebuilds by Lucas probably
didn't catch sinc
Package: src:extremetuxracer
Version: 0.5beta-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-* in experimental:
| i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
-DPP_DATADIR=\"/usr/share/games/extremetuxracer\"
-
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#560518: fixed in pandora-build 0.98-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #560518,
regarding pandora-build: FTBFS: configure.ac:8: error: m4_divert_push: cannot
change diversion to `GROW' inside m4_expand
to be m
Package: src:firebird2.5
Version: 2.5.0.25784~ReleaseCandidate1.ds2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-* in experimental:
| make[4]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-firebird2.5_2.5.0.25784~ReleaseCand
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 538034 2:3.4.4~dfsg-1
Bug #538034 [samba] Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D
Bug Marked as found in versions samba/2:3.4.4~dfsg-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:19:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#565674: fixed in easymp3gain 0.5.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #565674,
regarding easymp3gain: Package FTBFS on sparc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Package: src:rpm
Version: 4.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
looks like:
1. you're missing some Build-Depends;
2. the build should break earlier, when autogen.sh fails.
Log excerpt:
| mkdir b-lsb
| ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
| autopoint: *** cvs program not found
| autopoint: *
Source: libroxen-watchdog
Severity: serious
Justification: orphaned, zero popcon, inactive upstream
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
libroxen-watchdog seems like a candidate for removal from Debian:
* orphaned since September
* low popcon (no votes)
* no upstream source
Package: src:gthumb
Version: 3:2.11.0~svn2319-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-* in experimental, because libglade-2.0
isn't found:
| configure: error: Package requirements ( glib-2.0 >= 2.6.0
| g
Package: libsdl1.2debian-all
Version: 1.2.14-3
Severity: critical
Tags: upstream
Upgrading libsdl from 1.2.13-5 to 1.2.14-3 breaks Wesnoth. I tested with
both Wesnoth 1.6.5-1 and a recent upstream Wesnoth trunk revision.
Somebody did some more testing [1] and the problem seems to depend on
the WM
You want to customize starttls-use-gnutls.
If this variable is 't, then it will use gnutls, otherwise it will try
starttls.
Before your jabber connect do:
(setq starttls-use-gnutls 't)
In your gnus thingie do:
(setq starttls-use-gnutls nil)
Anyway, you should use gnutls-cli for gnus too, sinc
Package: src:qtcreator
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
it looks like the build system has issues finding out the Qt version. On
both kfreebsd-*, one gets:
| mkdir -p "."
| cd . && qmake 'QMAKE_CC = cc' 'QMAKE_CXX =
Upstream have fixed the bug but regressed the install paths; will get
that fixed then do a upload to grab it all.
-Rob
--
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: src:gmp
Version: 2:5.0.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 (while it still builds fine on
kfreebsd-amd64) in experimental:
| libtool: compile: i486-kfreebsd-gnu-gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE
Package: src:xmlrpc-c
Version: 1.16.07-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-* in experimental:
| make[3]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-xmlrpc-c_1.16.07-1-kfreebsd-amd64-drgk7T/xmlrpc-c-1.16.07/tools/lib'
| /usr/bin/make -C
/build/buildd-xmlrpc-c_1.16.0
Package: src:koffice
Version: 1:2.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD in experimental:
| [ 77%] Generating index.cache.bz2
| cd ../doc/karbon && /usr/bin/meinproc4 --check --cache
/build/buildd-k
Package: src:atk1.0
Version: 1.29.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-* in experimental, but that's probably
affecting other architectures as well:
| gtk-doc: Fixing cross-references
| cd . && gtkdoc-fi
Package: src:libgc
Version: 1:7.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS in experimental on kfreebsd-* due to symbol-related
changes (too long IMHO to be quoted here). Build logs are available at
the usual place:
http
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:02:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#551479: fixed in drbd8 2:8.3.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #551479,
regarding adding some capability-related code probably originating from drbd8
upstream, successful build but drbdadm up resources retu
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:02:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#563783: fixed in drbd8 2:8.3.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #563783,
regarding fails to install due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:02:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#547566: fixed in drbd8 2:8.3.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #547566,
regarding drbd8-utils: Incorrect dependencies in init.d scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:02:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552439: fixed in drbd8 2:8.3.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #552439,
regarding drbd8-source: compilation of the modules give a warning, loading the
modules result in a kernel error
to be marked as done.
tags 553553 + patch
thanks
Hi,
The following is an interdiff for a possible phpsysinfo 3.0~rc6-1.1 NMU.
This patch would solve #553553 completely. at the same time providing
information on the changes in the file NEWS.Debian.
The proposed NMU-package has not been uploaded anywhere, but it is
my
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 553553 + patch
Bug #553553 [phpsysinfo] phpsysinfo: dir-or-file-in-var-www /var/www/phpsysinfo
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
On Montag 18 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Cute, it looks like there is something messy with your aptitude in
> combination with sudo :(
>
> Does it help if you change on the host in /etc/apt-dater-host.conf the
> line: $DPKGTOOL="aptitude";
> to
> $DPKGTOOL="apt-get";
>
> ?
>
It takes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Klöckner schrieb:
> On Montag 18 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> Does it work if you change following:
>>
>> # Defaults !lecture,tty_tickets,!fqdn
>> Defaults env_reset
>
> No.
>
> Andreas
>
Cute, it looks like there is somethi
On Montag 18 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Does it work if you change following:
>
> # Defaults!lecture,tty_tickets,!fqdn
> Defaults env_reset
No.
Andreas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: src:ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.1.378-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
ruby1.9.1 FTBFS on sparc with the following error:
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/build/buildd-ruby1.9.1_1.9.1.378-1-sparc-KMvrBv/ruby1.9.1-1.9.1.378'
> compiling bigdecimal
> Aborted
> make[1]: *** [mkmain.sh] Error 134
> make:
Hi,
uptodate debian sid repos and i have still the same problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:32:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#560656: fixed in libcatalyst-perl 5.80018-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #560656,
regarding libcatalyst-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
tags 562322 + patch
usertags NMU
thanks
Hello.
I've prepare a patch for this bug. Find it attached.
Please apply it as soon as possible.
Greetings,
diff -u libmatheval-1.1.7/debian/changelog libmatheval-1.1.7/debian/changelog
--- libmatheval-1.1.7/debian/changelog
+++ libmatheval-1.1.7/debia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Klöckner schrieb:
> On Montag 18 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> Andreas Klöckner schrieb:
>>> On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
How does the /etc/sudoers file look on the target host?
>>> The relevant bit looks like
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 562322 + patch
Bug #562322 [src:libmatheval] libmatheval: FTBFS: libtool: link: cannot find
the library `/usr/lib/libltdl.la' or unhandled argument `/usr/lib/libltdl.la'
Added tag(s) patch.
> usertags NMU
Unknown command or malformed argumen
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 13.12.2009 16:29, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In order to guarantee that the system expat is used, the
>> '--with-expat=sys' configure argument must be used. If you think
>> your package is already using the system expat,
On Montag 18 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Andreas Klöckner schrieb:
> > On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> >> How does the /etc/sudoers file look on the target host?
> >
> > The relevant bit looks like this:
> > -
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:pandora-build
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.aliot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Klöckner schrieb:
> On Sonntag 17 Januar 2010, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> How does the /etc/sudoers file look on the target host?
>
> The relevant bit looks like this:
> --
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Can you check the following:
> In Edit > Preferences > Advanced > Encryption > Security Devices,
> Builtin Roots Module is there, with a Builtin Object Token underneath.
Yes that looks correct (and other https pages do work).
> If that is the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 565620 libnss3-1d
Bug #565620 [nss] iceweasel: https connection fails in current version
Bug reassigned from package 'nss' to 'libnss3-1d'.
> forcemerge 561918 565620
Bug#561918: client certificate authentication broken
Bug#565620: icewea
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:33:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#560563: fixed in diffmon 20020222-2.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #560563,
regarding diffmon: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `install'. Stop.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
OK, I can't see any sign of a double-free in either valgrind or
libefence, which are usually pretty good about catching this sort of
thing. Can you run something similar on FreeBSD and see what it says?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 562309 5.2.1-13
Bug #562309 [libvtk5-dev] fslview: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/lib/openmpi/lib/libmpi_cxx.so', needed by `bin/fslview'. Stop.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #562309 to the same value
Ah, I got fooled by some garbage printed by the cppunit test. The
actual problem is the double-free in the Boost tester. D'oh.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
