Processed: Owning bugs

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner 329104 ! Bug#329104: jmagick: FTBFS: Build-Depends (kaffe-dev and libmagick9-dev) Owner recorded as Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > tags 329104 +pending Bug#329104: jmagick: FTBFS: Build-Depends (kaffe-dev and libmagick9-dev) Tags were: patc

Bug#436249: package status

2007-10-13 Thread ehearn
Wesley J. Landaker wrote: > On Saturday 13 October 2007 11:09:45 Nico Golde wrote: >> Hi, >> I really don't want to piss you off but see this fixed. >> What is the current status. >> It should not need 3 weeks to prepare a new upload should >> it? If some sponsoring is needed feel free to ping me.

Processed: Re: Bug#446500: Severity

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 446500 serious Bug#446500: roundcube: Needs versioned dependency on dbconfig-common Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist' > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#445720: The GIMP plugins for refocussing blurred images

2007-10-13 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, fixing this bug is more easy than I thought - googling is a good idea sometimes (and would have saved me the time I spent on debugging...): http://www.cooptel.qc.ca/~rlemieu/refocus.html While I'm at it I'll integrate the refocus plugin into the gimp-plugin-registry package and provide tran

Bug#445797: marked as done (libcaca: FTBFS: pdflatex exits with error 1)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#445797: fixed in libcaca 0.99.beta12.debian-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#441170: marked as done (gabber - FTBFS: libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libdb-4.5.la' or unhandled argument `/usr/lib/libdb-4.5.la')

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:13:23 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gabber - FTBFS: libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libdb-4.5.la' or unhandled argument `/usr/lib/libdb-4.5.la' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 407083 pending Bug#407083: ITP: disksearch -- indexing and search tool for files on your removable disks There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 439500 pending Bug#439500: gutenp

Bug#446502: more information

2007-10-13 Thread Romain Beauxis
severity 446502 normal tags 446502 moreinfo thanks Hi ! I don't understand your report, which file and which section of the policy are you refering to ? Romain -- Could not recognize the faces standing over me; They were all dressed in uniforms of brutality. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Processed: more information

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 446502 normal Bug#446502: roundcube: Config template must not be stored below /usr/share/doc Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > tags 446502 moreinfo Bug#446502: roundcube: Config template must not be stored below /usr/share/doc There we

Processed: Severity

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 446500 wishlist Bug#446500: roundcube: Needs versioned dependency on dbconfig-common Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#446500: Severity

2007-10-13 Thread Romain Beauxis
severity 446500 wishlist thanks Hi ! Thanks for the report, but this certainly not a serious bug. Current roundcube works with current db-config, so there's no bug. If you need a proper dependency for your backports, do it there. Romain -- So anywhere I go, I want the world to know,

Bug#444509: Bug#444514: marked as done (gpredict: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared)

2007-10-13 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (14/10/2007): > Thanks for your NMU Cyril. However I think the above is excessive for > a simple FTBFS NMU for an otherwise maintained package. I'm sorry for that. I'm usually tempted to make the packages I upload lintian-clean, which is often required, or at lea

Bug#446515: Further information

2007-10-13 Thread Adam Bartley
Here is what I get when I launch from a terminal: --- Loading game.so --- LoadLibrary (./arena/game.so) InitGame Master server at 69.143.97.41:27900 Sending a ping. --- Server Initialization --- 0 entities inhibited 0 teams with 0 entities

Bug#444509: Bug#444514: marked as done (gpredict: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared)

2007-10-13 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 08:52:39PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Changes: > grig (0.7.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Non-maintainer upload. >* Remove “-DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED” from src/Makefile.{am,in} to avoid > FTBFS > due to the transition to Gtk 2.12 (Closes:

Bug#446112: rt2500-source: fails to compile with 2.6.22-2-amd64 kernel

2007-10-13 Thread Ben Hutchings
I intend to upload a new upstream snapshot that fixes this. However, I am waiting for rutilt (replacement for the rt2500 GUI) to be accepted into the archive first, You could try rt2x00-source, which should now work with 2.6.22 and 2.6.23. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Life is like a sewer: what you g

Processed: tagging 446112

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 446112 pending Bug#446112: rt2500-source: fails to compile with 2.6.22-2-amd64 kernel There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Pl

Bug#436249: package status

2007-10-13 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
On Saturday 13 October 2007 11:09:45 Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > I really don't want to piss you off but see this fixed. > What is the current status. > It should not need 3 weeks to prepare a new upload should > it? If some sponsoring is needed feel free to ping me. I pinged Ervin a few times, but

Bug#446546: marked as done (geoip: should this package be orphaned?)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:48:03 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line package adoption progress has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#446546: geoip: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: geoip Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While attempting to package a program I've noticed this package's version is old and more and more programs require the 1.4.x version of the library. There's also a security-related bug report which is almost

Bug#444514: fixed in grig 0.7.2-1.1

2007-10-13 Thread Cyril Brulebois
notfixed 444514 0.7.2-1.1 thanks Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/10/2007): > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of > grig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: […] Which is of course a wrong bug number in the changelog, gpredict/444514 i

Bug#444509: marked as done (grig: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:23:28 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444509: grig: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Processed: Re: Bug#446492: irm: should this package be removed?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 446492 normal Bug#446492: irm: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 446492 ftp.debian.org Bug#446492: irm: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `irm' to `ftp.debian.org'. >

Bug#444518: "embedded code copies"

2007-10-13 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi. (The following is just some not-so-random bits of a Debian maintainer, interested by tracking release-critical bugs. Neither the maintainer of ardour, or a member of Debian's Security Team.) Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/10/2007): > i would like to make it clear that if Debian attempts t

Bug#446268: marked as done (vim ABRT: glibc: vim: invalid next size (fast): 0x00000000007fd430)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:05:34 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in upstream patch has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#444523: marked as done (ebview: FTBFS: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444523: fixed in ebview 0.3.6-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#444512: marked as done (xdx: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:47:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444512: fixed in xdx 2.2-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#444514: marked as done (gpredict: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:47:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444514: fixed in grig 0.7.2-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#444501: marked as done (xlog: FTBFS: error: 'gtk_widget_unref' undeclared)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:47:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444501: fixed in xlog 1.5-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#445731: mplayer stops working after kernel update to 2.6.21

2007-10-13 Thread Reimar Döffinger
Hello, On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:25:06PM -0400, Sean Zimmermann wrote: > I found ALSA stopped working after the kernel upgrade. Any program that > tried to work with alsa (like xmms, totem, or gnome sound) stalled. I > recompiled the drivers and alsa now appears to be working. While it does not

Bug#446500: roundcube: Needs versioned dependency on dbconfig-common

2007-10-13 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du samedi 13 octobre 2007, vers 16:33, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Installing this package on an Etch system fullfills all dependencies, > but fails to initialize a database. > Backporting a newer version of dbconfig-common makes the installat

Bug#446537: libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio: pulseaudio output does not work

2007-10-13 Thread Alex Malinovich
Package: libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio Version: 1.2.12-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The pulseaudio specific package for libsdl (libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio) does not appear to work at all. Using libsdl1.2debian-all and specify

Bug#434954: marked as done (FTBFS (ia64): Exec failed: No such file or directory)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#434954: fixed in gnuplot 4.2.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#445731: mplayer stops working after kernel update to 2.6.21

2007-10-13 Thread Sean Zimmermann
I found ALSA stopped working after the kernel upgrade. Any program that tried to work with alsa (like xmms, totem, or gnome sound) stalled. I recompiled the drivers and alsa now appears to be working. However, although alsa is now working, mplayer still has the same problem (though now it w

Bug#444518: "embedded code copies"

2007-10-13 Thread Paul Davis
i would like to make it clear that if Debian attempts to distribute a version of Ardour that builds without internal linkage, we (the ardour project) will be unable to provide support to any Debian user who has problems of any kind. we have notified Gentoo of the same thing, and have so far had to

Processed: Re: ardour: FTBFS: error: 'const struct _GtkToolbar' has no member named 'tooltips'

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > fixed 444518 1:2.1-1 Bug#444518: ardour: FTBFS: error: 'const struct _GtkToolbar' has no member named 'tooltips' Bug marked as fixed in version 1:2.1-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#446508: museekd: Hangs on start

2007-10-13 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Hi, This message is only a warning. Use musetup-gtk (ie) to configure your user's info picture. Then the warning will go. However, I just checked again, everything works fine if you're user pic is not set. I guess you made a mistake somewhere (daemon really started? interface password?) because h

Processed: (pas de sujet)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 446508 normal Bug#446508: museekd: Hangs on start Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Bug#423322: Maintainership of SWI-Prolog

2007-10-13 Thread Chris Lamb
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I will be very much grateful for its up-to-date and complete version. > > Chris, could you give us an update on that? I have half-packaged the latest upstream, just a few of the extra packages (like -xpce, etc.) are now missing. In a few days so I can also try it on amd

Bug#446505: marked as done (wesnoth: not meant for unstable)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:17:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#446505: fixed in wesnoth 1:1.2.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#446524: linhdd: Execute error: /usr/bin/linHDD line 411

2007-10-13 Thread Carlos C Soto
Package: linhdd Version: 0.4-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I try to run linHDD it gives this error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/linHDD", line 559, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/linHDD", line 554, in main DriveWin() File "/usr/bin/l

Bug#446462: marked as done (/usr/bin/vim is left broken when alternative is manual and points to vim-full)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#446462: fixed in vim 1:7.1-138+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#446276: installing ICU's build dependencies on pergolesi (for RC bug)

2007-10-13 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
I'm trying to work through an amd64-only problem with the ICU packages. In particular, I need to be able to build the 32-bit libraries. In order for this to be possible, can someone install the build dependencies for ICU 3.6-6 in the sid_amd64_pure chroot on pergolesi? Here is the Build-Depends

Processed: tagging 441275

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 441275 + lenny sid Bug#441275: ivtv-source: ivtv-fb and the X driver ivtvdev don't work any more There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping proces

Bug#446276: webkit: FTBFS: TCSystemAlloc.cpp:89: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before '(' token

2007-10-13 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:30:36PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > > When looking at the Makefile, I see things like this in the > > CXXFLAGS and LIBS: "### or --detect-prefix" > > > > This seems to come from running icu-config: > > $ icu-config --cppflags > > ### icu-config: Can't find /usr/lib3

Bug#445779: gdb trace

2007-10-13 Thread hungerburg
Package: rdesktop Version: 1.5.0-2+cvs20071006 Followup-For: Bug #445779 I apt-get-built from source and set gdb on a non-stripped binary: running with DE_AT locale, crash soon: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fau

Processed: severity of 446460 is serious

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9 > severity 446460 serious Bug#446460: geotoad: Crashes with undefined method message Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#423202: topal: should this package be removed?

2007-10-13 Thread Phil Brooke
Hi, On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 10/05/07 at 16:48 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * 2 RC bugs opened for a long time * unmaintained upstream

Bug#436249: package status

2007-10-13 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, I really don't want to piss you off but see this fixed. What is the current status. It should not need 3 weeks to prepare a new upload should it? If some sponsoring is needed feel free to ping me. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For se

Processed: your mail

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 413925 pending Bug#413925: gpsprof: gpsd-clients should depend on python-support There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tag 295375 pending Bug#295375: gpsd: Please split libgps into separate packages Tags were: etch-ignore Tags added: pendin

Bug#446515: Subject: alien-arena: game fails to start after single player game chosen

2007-10-13 Thread Adam Bartley
Package: alien-arena Version: 6.05-4.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** The game gives the opening menu, allows you to change settings, allows you to chose to begin a single player game and then chokes and dies. A check of Xo

Bug#446462: /usr/bin/vim is left broken when alternative is manual and points to vim-full

2007-10-13 Thread James Vega
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 11:43:32AM -0400, James Vega wrote: > *sigh* I don't know what made piuparts succeed before but it is > definitely exhibiting the reported behavior now. Looks like it's time for > another update-alternatives hack. Actually, it was a typo on my part in the preinst file. I'

Bug#423242: estraier: should this package be removed?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
clone 423242 -1 reassign -1 wnpp severity -1 normal retitle -1 thanks On 10/05/07 at 21:57 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package > came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: > * RC buggy for 170 days without c

Bug#423335: marked as done (libooc-x11: should this package be removed?)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:37:14 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423335: libooc-x11: should this package be removed? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Processed: Re: Bug#423202: topal: should this package be removed?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 423202 -1 Bug#423202: topal: should this package be removed? Bug 423202 cloned as bug 446513. > reassign -1 wnpp Bug#446513: topal: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `topal' to `wnpp'. > severity -1 normal Bug#446513: t

Bug#423336: marked as done (libooc-xml: should this package be removed?)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:37:14 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423335: libooc-x11: should this package be removed? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#423324: marked as done (ivi: should this package be removed?)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:33:52 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423324: ivi: should this package be removed? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#423242: estraier: should this package be removed?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 423242 -1 Bug#423242: estraier: should this package be removed? Bug 423242 cloned as bug 446514. > reassign -1 wnpp Bug#446514: estraier: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `estraier' to `wnpp'. > severity -1 normal Bug#

Bug#423202: topal: should this package be removed?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
clone 423202 -1 reassign -1 wnpp severity -1 normal retitle -1 O: topal -- Links Pine and GnuPG together thanks On 10/05/07 at 16:48 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package > came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, becau

Bug#446276: webkit: FTBFS: TCSystemAlloc.cpp:89: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before '(' token

2007-10-13 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
> When looking at the Makefile, I see things like this in the > CXXFLAGS and LIBS: "### or --detect-prefix" > > This seems to come from running icu-config: > $ icu-config --cppflags > ### icu-config: Can't find /usr/lib32/libicuuc.so - ICU prefix is wrong. > ### Try the --prefix= or --exec-pr

Processed: tagging 441165

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 441165 + sid Bug#441165: nyello: fails to install There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: tagging 440623

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 440623 + lenny sid Bug#440623: openoffice.org-officebean: uninstallable on testing (broken dependency) There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping

Processed: tagging 440630

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 440630 + lenny sid Bug#440630: bsdmainutils: hexdump is lost, needs a new upload with appropriate conflicts There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, sto

Processed: tagging 441164

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 441164 + sid Bug#441164: gxmms2: fails to install There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#445840: Bug#421053: irssi: prepared NMU to fix some pending issues

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 13/10/07 at 17:07 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Package: irssi > Followup-For: Bug #445840 > > Hi! > > I've prepared an NMU which I plan to upload on monday, with the > following changelog: > > #v+ > irssi (0.8.12-0.1) unstable; urgency=low > > * NMU: New upstream release (closes

Bug#446508: museekd: Hangs on start

2007-10-13 Thread Hans J� Hoel
Package: museekd Version: 0.1.12-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading to 1:0.1.13, museekd started to hang when started. It outputted this line: museekd :: Version 0.1.13 :: Museek Daemon Plus And then complained about a missing config.image. After adding

Bug#446462: /usr/bin/vim is left broken when alternative is manual and points to vim-full

2007-10-13 Thread James Vega
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 11:25:49AM -0400, James Vega wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 11:21:12AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 10:43:54AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > $ LANG=C update-alternatives --display vim > > > vim - status is manual. > > > > Uhm, are you

Bug#446462: /usr/bin/vim is left broken when alternative is manual and points to vim-full

2007-10-13 Thread James Vega
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 11:21:12AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 10:43:54AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > $ LANG=C update-alternatives --display vim > > vim - status is manual. > > Uhm, are you sure this bug does apply only when the alternatives status > is manual?

Bug#424820: what about etch?

2007-10-13 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Rimas Kudelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/10/2007): > It would be great if the dependency of php-file on PHP4 would be > removed in etch too: […] I'm afraid this won't happen. While the bug is serious on lenny/sid, getting rid of PHP4 in etch is no release goal at all… Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois

Bug#445840: irssi: prepared NMU to fix some pending issues

2007-10-13 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Package: irssi Followup-For: Bug #445840 Hi! I've prepared an NMU which I plan to upload on monday, with the following changelog: #v+ irssi (0.8.12-0.1) unstable; urgency=low * NMU: New upstream release (closes: #445840, 421053) - patch 05upgrade-check-binary.dpatch applied upstr

Bug#446505: wesnoth: not meant for unstable

2007-10-13 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Package: wesnoth Version: 1.3.9-2 Severity: serious Hi! The upload of 1.3.9 to unstable instead of experimental was an error - this will get addressed with a reupload of an epoched version of 1.2.7. 1.3.9 is the development branch and too much changing in between releases to properly bei

Bug#423316: pnetc: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 423316 normal reassign 423316 wnpp retitle 423316 O: pnetc -- DotGNU C runtime libraries thanks On 11/05/07 at 01:15 -0600, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came > up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its mainta

Bug#442208: request to remove dosemu-freedos from stable

2007-10-13 Thread Luk Claes
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:21:36PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 08:24 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:11:07AM +0200, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Please remove dosemu-freedos version 1:0.0.b9r5a-3 from Stable. > > > http://bugs.de

Bug#423313: marked as done (php-image-canvas: should this package be orphaned?#)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:57:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423313: php-image-canvas: should this package be orphaned?# has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Processed: Re: Bug#423316: pnetc: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423316 normal Bug#423316: pnetc: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423316 wnpp Bug#423316: pnetc: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `pnetc' to `wnpp'. > retitle 4233

Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 429794 normal reassign 429794 wnpp retitle 429794 O: jmagick -- A java interface to ImageMagick - java classes thanks On 20/06/07 at 08:47 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package > came up as a package that should maybe be orpha

Bug#423321: Bug#385285: scsi-idle: obsolete kernel, dummy bug

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
forcemerge 385285 423321 severity 385285 normal reassign 385285 ftp.debian.org retitle 385285 RM: scsi-idle -- RoQA; RC-buggy, useless thanks On 17/04/07 at 13:31 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 18/12/06 at 10:51 +0100, Marcus Better wrote: > > Suggest removing the package from Debian altogether

Processed: Re: Bug#385285: scsi-idle: obsolete kernel, dummy bug

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 385285 423321 Bug#385285: scsi-idle: obsolete kernel, dummy bug Bug#423321: scsi-idle: should this package be orphaned? Forcibly Merged 385285 423321. > severity 385285 normal Bug#385285: scsi-idle: obsolete kernel, dummy bug Bug#423321: scs

Processed: Re: Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 429794 normal Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 429794 wnpp Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `jmagick' to `wnpp'. > retitl

Bug#423317: ppscsi: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 11/05/07 at 22:35 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > * Michael Ablassmeier [Fri, May 11 2007, 01:15:59AM]: > > Package: ppscsi > > Version: 0.3 > > Severity: serious > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Usertags: proposed-orphan > > > > Hi, > > > > While reviewing packages that were not inclu

Bug#423322: Maintainership of SWI-Prolog

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Chris, Janusz, On 09/07/07 at 10:27 +0200, Janusz S. =?UTF-8?Q?Bie=C5=84 wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 Chris Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > I have contacted Gerardo Curiel and he has agreed to let me become a > > co-maintainer of the SWI-Prolog package. I am a regu

Bug#446502: roundcube: Config template must not be stored below /usr/share/doc

2007-10-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: roundcube Version: 0.1~rc1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.3 Postinst creates the man config file from a file below /usr/share/doc. Debian Policy demands that packages must not rely on /usr/share/doc - instead, symlinks from /usr/share/doc to its location below /usr/share/

Bug#423302: marked as done (murasaki: should this package be orphaned?)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:15:15 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423302: murasaki: should this package be orphaned? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: Re: Bug#423311: pnet: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423311 normal Bug#423311: pnet: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423311 wnpp Bug#423311: pnet: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `pnet' to `wnpp'. > retitle 423311

Processed: Re: Bug#423299: metalog: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423299 normal Bug#423299: metalog: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423299 wnpp Bug#423299: metalog: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `metalog' to `wnpp'. > retitl

Bug#423305: marked as done (oo2c: should this package be orphaned?)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:17:25 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423305: oo2c: should this package be orphaned? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Processed: Re: Bug#423327: liblinux-aio-perl: should this package be removed?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423294 normal Bug#423294: liblinux-aio-perl: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423294 wnpp Bug#423294: liblinux-aio-perl: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `liblinux-

Processed: Re: Bug#423298: mercury: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423298 normal Bug#423298: mercury: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423298 wnpp Bug#423298: mercury: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `mercury' to `wnpp'. > retitl

Bug#423298: mercury: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 423298 normal reassign 423298 wnpp retitle 423298 O: mercury -- A new logic/functional programming language thanks On 01/06/07 at 22:02 +1200, Roy Ward wrote: > I'd like to adopt the mercury (and mercury-docs) packages, unless someone > more qualified wishes to do it. Hi Roy, I've just

Bug#423294: Bug#423327: liblinux-aio-perl: should this package be removed?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 423294 normal reassign 423294 wnpp retitle 423294 O: liblinux-aio-perl -- linux-specific perl aio implemented using clone thanks On 11/05/07 at 01:40 -0600, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > Hi, > > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came > up as a possible

Bug#423308: oskit: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 423308 normal reassign 423308 wnpp retitle 423308 O: oskit -- The Flux Operating System Toolkit, a framework for OS design thanks > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came > up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: > >

Bug#423299: metalog: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 423299 normal reassign 423299 wnpp retitle 423299 O: metalog -- Modern logging daemon with regexp support thanks On 11/05/07 at 01:00 -0600, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > Hi, > > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came > up as a package that should maybe

Processed: Re: Bug#423293: libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423293 normal Bug#423293: libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423293 wnpp Bug#423293: libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package

Bug#423297: marked as done (mc-foo: should this package be orphaned?)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:07:58 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423297: mc-foo: should this package be orphaned? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#446500: roundcube: Needs versioned dependency on dbconfig-common

2007-10-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: roundcube Version: 0.1~rc1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 Installing this package on an Etch system fullfills all dependencies, but fails to initialize a database. Backporting a newer version of dbconfig-common makes the installation succeed. this leads me to assume, th

Bug#423293: libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 423293 normal reassign 423293 wnpp retitle 423293 O: libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2 -- XMLRPC Server module for Apache2 web server thanks On 11/05/07 at 00:49 -0600, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > Hi, > > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came > up as a package

Processed: Re: Bug#423308: oskit: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423308 normal Bug#423308: oskit: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423308 wnpp Bug#423308: oskit: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `oskit' to `wnpp'. > retitle 4233

Bug#423295: marked as done (libooc-vo: should this package be orphaned?)

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:07:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423295: libooc-vo: should this package be orphaned? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#423311: pnet: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 423311 normal reassign 423311 wnpp retitle 423311 O: pnet -- DotGNU C# compiler, runtime, (dis)assembler severity 423312 normal reassign 423312 wnpp retitle 423312 O: pnet-assemblies -- DotGNU C# class libraries thanks On 11/05/07 at 01:08 -0600, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > Hi, > > Whil

Processed: Re: Bug#423292: lessdisks: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423292 normal Bug#423292: lessdisks: should this package be removed? Bug#389498: remove lessdisks from debian Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423292 ftp.debian.org Bug#423292: lessdisks: should this package be removed? Bug#3

Bug#423292: lessdisks: should this package be orphaned?

2007-10-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
severity 423292 normal reassign 423292 ftp.debian.org retitle 423292 RM: lessdisks -- RoM; RC-buggy, useless thanks Oh, well... - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm

  1   2   >