This bug has now been fixed upstream, here:
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/gzip/gzip-1.3.6.tar.gz
The upstream version should have all the fixes in Debian's 1.3.5-15
package. However, upstream doesn't have functionality improvements
like --rsyncable; just bug fixes for now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
tags 398400 + patch
thanks
Even though this a simple fix, I provide anyhow a patch for it.
(the patch is attached to this email)
diff -ur egnome-0.cvs20020302.orig/debian/postinst egnome-0.cvs20020302/debian/postinst
--- egnome-0.cvs20020302.orig/debian/postinst 2006-11-26 01:57:19.0 -
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:11:27PM -0700, Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 11:20:26PM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> > First, do you still have the .deb for 3.0.6 lying around somewhere? For
> > example in /var/cache/apt/archives?
>
> I found a copy at http://apt.agnula.org/demudi/po
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> forcemerge 400375 400424
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400424: ..error in control file
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Bug#400401: xterm upgrade: error in control file: `Form
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25
> tags 398457 + pending
Bug#398457: CVE-2006-5467: Ruby "cgi.rb" Denial of Service Vulnerability
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:36:45AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 03:19:28PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> >> Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.23-1.1), debhelper (>= 4.2.0),
> >> libsdl1.2-dev, libsdl-image1.2-dev, libsdl-m
Alvaro Martinez Echevarria wrote:
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Ari Pollak wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 01:15 -0800, Alvaro Martinez Echevarria wrote:
The bug specifies that firefox does not work either.
Should that be confirmed before closing the bug?
Please accept my deepest apologie
Robert Woodcock wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:17:54AM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
>
>> Package: netdiag
>> Version: 0.7-7.1
>> Severity: grave
>> Tags: security
>> Justification: user security hole
>>
>>
>> Several of the applications in this package now routinely segfault and
>> leave t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 400052 grave
Bug#400052: autoprofile_2.14-2+b1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compiler errors
Severity set to `grave' from `serious'
> reassign 400052 gaim-autoprofile
Bug#400052: autoprofile_2.14-2+b1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compiler errors
Bug reassi
severity 400052 grave
reassign 400052 gaim-autoprofile
merge 400052 394773
thanks
Debian Bug report logs source autoprofile.URL
Description: Binary data
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:19:58 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.13.24
> Architecture: sparc
> Severity: grave
> I have some SparcSTATION 20 with one or two SuperSPARC-II and 448 MB
> of memory (thus, HIGHMEM is used). On these workstations, dpkg works fine.
> If I repl
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> I've stopped after the Win2k chkdsk as that turned out to be sufficient to
> make Vista boot again, so running the Vista repair is unnecessary!
> The md5sum check after running chkdsk showed only /pagefile.sys deleted.
Yes, there isn't really anything s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> forcemerge 400375 400414
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400414: xterm not installing (error in control file)
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Bug#400401: xterm upgrade: error i
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 03:19:28PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.23-1.1), debhelper (>= 4.2.0),
> libsdl1.2-dev, libsdl-image1.2-dev, libsdl-mixer1.2-dev,
> libsdl-net1.2-dev, libsdl-ttf1.2-dev | libsdl-ttf2.0-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> forcemerge 400375 400403
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400403: invalid doc-base file
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Bug#400401: xterm upgrade: error in control file: `Format
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Ari Pollak wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 01:15 -0800, Alvaro Martinez Echevarria wrote:
> > The bug specifies that firefox does not work either.
> > Should that be confirmed before closing the bug?
>
> Please accept my deepest apologies for missing a small parenthetical
> re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 368485 + pending
Bug#368485: amarok involves two circular dependencies
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 368485 + pending
Bug#368485: amarok involves two circular dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> forcemerge 400375 400403
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400403: invalid doc-base file
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Forcibly Merged 400375 400389 400403.
>
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 400375 400401
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400401: xterm upgrade: error in control file: `Format' value not specified
at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 699, line 22.
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Bug#400403: invalid doc-base file
F
While trying to autobuild lucene, I ran into several different failures.
Over 16 builds, it failed 3 times and timeouted once.
And succeeded 12 times? Sounds good enough to me. Let's leave
this alone until etch is released, then can look into switching to a Sun
JDK build (once the Sun JDK gets
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2
Severity: serious
The upgrade of xterm fails with the following error message:
Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs
line 699, line 22.
dpkg: error processing xterm (--configure):
subprocess post
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 400183 + patch
Bug#400183: tesseract-ocr: tessdata directory with content missing
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Package: ca-certificates
Version: 20061027
Followup-For: Bug #387089
Greetings,
I have tested the patch for c_rehash submitted in this bug report. The patch
seems to work. Here is what I did.
I patched c_rehash in the openssl source with the patch provided in the bug
report. I then rebuilt th
On sáb, 2006-11-25 at 20:27 +0100, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> . . . . LEAVE: Imendio.Blam.ThemeManager:LoadThemes (string)
> . . . . ENTER: Imendio.Blam.Conf:Get
> (string,string)([STRING:0x4bf40:ui/theme],
> [STRING:0x4af00:/usr/share/blam/themesblam], )
Well, here is the problem. For some rea
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:41:40 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> remote-tty contains a new top-level directory /share:
Patch 1:
fix error in line which creates the directory
--- debian/rules.orig 2006-11-26 00:05:57.0 +0100
+++ debian/rules2006-11-26 00:07:13.0 +0100
@@ -35,
Package: dh-make-perl
Version: 0.24
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When trying to create a .deb from DateTime-Format-ISO8601-0.0403,
dh-make-perl put the following line into debian/control:
Build-Depends-Indep: 5.8.8-6.1
>From looking at an older version of dh-make-perl, I guessed that
something
Package: monodoc-http
Version: 1.1.18-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Resulting web page when pointing browser to http://localhost:8081/monodoc
is a three part frame. The top frame looks ok, but only contain a link to
itself and to: http://localhost:8081/monodoc/login.a
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399413: fixed in xlogmaster 1.6.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:01:14PM +, Calum Mackay wrote:
> Crashing here too on startup:
With a completely different error.
> Please re-open this bug.
You should file a new bug report for this unrelated crash.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
D
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 04:40:46PM +0100, Michael Burschik wrote:
> The command "migrate_passwd.pl /etc/passwd" marks all passwords
> in /etc/shadow as {crypt} passwords, although they are clearly
> {md5} passwords and are marked as such by "$1$".
How does this break? The system crypt() functio
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 03:01:36PM -0700, Ron Jensen wrote:
> Not the original reporter, but I see it too:
First, do you still have the .deb for 3.0.6 lying around somewhere? For
example in /var/cache/apt/archives? If so, can you send it to me (no
need to cc the bts.)? I don't have the binary pack
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397214: fixed in uswsusp 0.3~cvs20060928-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
forcemerge 400375 400389
kthxbye
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 22:33:55 +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> xterm 222-2 fails to install:
>
> Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
> Installing new version of config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/KOI8RXTerm ...
> error in control file: `Format' value not specif
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 400375 400389
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Forcibly Merged 400375 400389.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> # not ported, per the maintainer
> severity 400334 important
Bug#400334: kvm - FTBFS: cpu.h: No such file or directory
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, st
Not the original reporter, but I see it too:
# dpkg -r solfege
(Reading database ... 216078 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing solfege ...
usage: update-python-modules [-v] [-c] package_directory [...]
update-python-modules [-v] [-c] package.dirs [...]
update-python
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2
Severity: grave
Hello,
xterm 222-2 fails to install:
Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/KOI8RXTerm ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs
line 699, line 22.
dpkg: erro
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:17:54AM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
> Package: netdiag
> Version: 0.7-7.1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
>
> Several of the applications in this package now routinely segfault and
> leave the port in promiscuous mode with no w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 400104 pending
Bug#400104: subcommander: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-depends on libsvn-dev and
libneon25-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 15:21 +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> Package: blam
>
> Hi,
>
> OK, I think I know what is happening. It's something that really
> shouldn't happen.
>
> The problem is simply in blam, so from now on you can just use
> --trace=program instead of the one you just used.
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392776: fixed in mbr 1.1.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400376: fixed in mol 0.9.71.dfsg-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
This package should not be built on other arches, it is meaningless for
any but i386 and will be useful for amd64 in a later version. The
package has Architecture: i386, why is it being auto-built at all?
Baruch
* Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061125 18:04]:
> Package: kvm
> Version: 4-1
> S
Package: fmit
Version: 0.96.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #385946
Crashing here too on startup:
CaptureThread: WARNING: ALSA: cannot set channel count to one. channels
will be mixed
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1224427840 (LWP 25140)]
0xb721ae5c in free () f
Package: dissy
Version: 3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
This package is a frontend for objdump, readelf and nm, but it does
not depend on binutils. It's lacking dependencies at least also on
python-gtk2. Please check if anything else is missing before
uploading.
thanks,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package azureus
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: azureus
> forcemerge 392114 400354
Bug#392114: azureus: FTBFS in etch: The import org.eclipse cannot be resolved
Bug#400354: azureus: FTBFS: import org.eclipse cannot be resolved
Forcibly Merged 392114 400
Package: icedove
Version: 1.5.0.7-3
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Icedove loses some mails with broken headers. The problem is described in
detail
here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360409
I think this should be a RC bug because Icedove is a widely
Hi,
In Debian we are currently seeing some problems with drivers that are
repeatedly loaded unsuccessfully:
kernel: Intel ISA PCIC probe: not found.
FATAL: Error inserting i82365: no such device
kernel: Intel ISA PCIC probe: not found.
[...]
According to Marco d'Itri this could be because "platf
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> package xterm
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xterm
> tags 400375 + pending
Bug#400375: fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping proces
Package: bigloo
Version: 2.8c-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of bigloo_2.8c-3 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20061125-0458
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 399907 +patch
Bug#399907: language-env does not install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Looks like the NMU to 0.67-0.1 broke installation. The changelog says:
* Remove the debconf note that's displayed only in very rare
situations and rather pertains to README.Debian
and debian/config has been removed, but the postinst still contains:
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
db_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have build this on etch and in a clean sid chroot and it builds fine.
The problem seems to be with the swt library. The files in question are
in the libswt-gtk-3.2-java package, which azureus build-depends on.
This seems to be a non-issue, I recomm
Package: mol-source
Version: 0.9.71.dfsg-3
Severity: serious
mol-source needs m4 to build but doesn't depend on it.
| /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.18-3-powerpc
M=/build/buildd/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.18/debian/build/build_powerpc_none_powerpc_mol/kmod
-j8
| make[3]: Entering
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2
Severity: grave
Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/KOI8RXTerm ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs
line 699, line 22.
dpkg: error processing xterm (--configure):
subp
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.24
Architecture: sparc
Severity: grave
Hello,
I have some SparcSTATION 20 with one or two SuperSPARC-II and 448 MB of
memory (thus, HIGHMEM is used). On these workstations, dpkg works fine.
If I replace SuperSPARC-II by one, two or four ROSS RT-626, I canno
Quoting David Gil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> El sáb, 25-11-2006 a las 17:58 +0100, Christian Perrier escribió:
> > I'm building the package and I'll upload
>
> Thanks Christian, my sponsor has already done it.
OK, thenI attempted the upload as well, which means that a REJECT
message will probabl
El sáb, 25-11-2006 a las 17:58 +0100, Christian Perrier escribió:
> I'm building the package and I'll upload
Thanks Christian, my sponsor has already done it.
Thanks again,
David.
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:48:15 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Maybe the package should put something in /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins?
AFAICS this happens in the new version 3.31-5, so I guess this bug
can be closed.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
Quoting David Gil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> tags 398619 + pending
> tags 395055 + pending
> thanks
>
> I think the best solution right now is depending on all cmdline clients
> supported by the package, until a best solution is adopted. I will
> follow the progress of bugs like #353617 and #398634.
>
Package: mozart-gtk
Version: 20060615-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of mozart-gtk_20060615-2 on nasya by sbuild/sparc 0.50
> Build started at 2006112
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400174: fixed in libextractor 0.5.16-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Enough stalling. Here's a debdiff for a sarge security update. I have
tested that the warning message is certainly triggered by the bogus
length values Adam found. I *think* the bug may only be exploitable on
64-bit systems, as read() calls seem to fail immediately where the
length would result
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> # uninstallable due to unmet dep on firefox (<1.6)
> severity 397995 serious
Bug#397995: New version with Firefox 2.0 support
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
>
End of messa
Package: azureus
Version: 2.5.0.0+0-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
At 1164472396 time_t, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Automatic build of azureus_2.5.0.0+0-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 2006112
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398545: fixed in sitebar 3.3.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: netdiag
Version: 0.7-7.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Several of the applications in this package now routinely segfault and leave
the port in promiscuous mode with no warning.
The problem was first reported nearly ten years ago (7794 and 12306) and n
On Saturday 25 November 2006 01:17, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I hope the info available now will be sufficient to track down the
> > problem. If not, I could repeat the procedure and also generate an
> > image after running the Windows 2000 chkdsk.
>
> P
If you somehow get the package installed, you may not be able to remove it:
Removing libooc-x11-dev ...
xargs: /usr/lib/oo2c/ooconfig: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing libooc-x11-dev (--purge):
subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 127
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 368485 serious
Bug#368485: amarok involves two circular dependencies
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
clone 337243 386415
thanks
These bugs are related although 337243 is already closed, because you
just put a trac.ini file in /usr/share/trac/conf and it will be the
default.
but this is not the right way to do it, because /usr/share/ is not for
conffiles. representing a policy violation.
best
Package: migrationtools
Version: 46-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=en_US
Package: rubrica
Severity: serious
Version: 1.0.15-1
Tags: sid
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on python2.3-libxslt1 which is
not available in unstable anymore. You might want to consider depending on
python-libxslt1 which only provides python2.4-libxslt1 instead...
Cheers
Luk
> I can't find any references to the POSIX thread issue in
> Oracle/Sleepycat's documentation. Could you please elaborate a bit, or
> consider including db4.5 without necessarily rebuilding other
> applications to link against it. As you know, bdb has a long history of
> requiring a few years
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 386415 serious
Bug#386415: /etc/trac isn't recognised by trac
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> retitle 386415 Debian Policy Violation 10.7.2
Bug#386415: /etc/trac isn't recognised by trac
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processi
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398619: fixed in acidbase 1.2.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: wormux
Version: 0.7.4-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of wormux_0.7.4-2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.23-1.1), debhelper (>= 4.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 393422 Contains non-free files.
Bug#393422: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Changed Bug title.
> tag 393422 - etch-ignore
Bug#393422: Contains non-free files.
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags removed: etch-ignore
> clone 393422 -1
B
Package: kvm
Version: 4-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of kvm_4-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/kvm-4/qemu/s390-softmmu'
> gcc-3.4 -I /build/buildd/kvm-4/qemu/../user -Wal
retitle 393422 Contains non-free files.
tag 393422 - etch-ignore
clone 393422 -1
clone 393422 -2
clone 393422 -3
reassign -1 iceweasel
reassign -2 icedove
reassign -3 mozilla
thanks
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 07:01:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike,
>
> On Sun, Nov 19, 20
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:11:16PM +0100, Frederik Wagner wrote:
> Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
> Version: 2.6.17-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
> The source package depends on the 'squashfs-source' and 'unionfs-source'
> package, which are not available in
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:52:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line unreproducable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398733: fixed in open-iscsi 2.0.730-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397636: fixed in open-iscsi 2.0.730-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Mike,
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 06:28:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Does your question apply to *all* of the files mentioned in the mail you
> > linked to? I don't understand which files you believe are non-free and why;
> > some of the files mentioned are things like Microsoft Office document
Package: blam
Hi,
OK, I think I know what is happening. It's something that really
shouldn't happen.
The problem is simply in blam, so from now on you can just use
--trace=program instead of the one you just used.
I get timeouts whilst trying to download the file.
Just before those two line
Hi Philipp,
find attached my patch for my NMU of your open-iscsi package. This patch
does NOT contain the new upstream tar-ball. As on request in #397636 i
used version 2.0.730 of upstream's tar-ball.
This upload goes to experimental, so we still have all possibilities
open for etch.
Greetings
M
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399841: fixed in regina 3.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 400108 + unreproducible
Bug#400108: vino: password check broken?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 400108 important
Bug#400108: vino: password check broken?
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> stop
Stopping proc
tags 400108 + unreproducible
severity 400108 important
stop
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006, Holger Leskien wrote:
> at some point in the last weeks vino stopped working on my computer.
> First I thought it might be a wrong password issue, but now I checked
> more thoroughly. This is what the vi
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 12:20:40 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> It would really be great if somebody could fix this, or if a new
> package without powerpc support could be uploaded.
Hi Lucas,
GCI support for powerpc is dropped for now, a new package is uploaded
few minutes ago.
Than
On 11/25/06, Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Bruno: If you have anything to add or correct, please let us know.]
Hi Hugo,
Would be great if you could cc the bug report. Other than that, thanks a
lot for sending the additional information through! I think I know what
is going on n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 398619 + pending
Bug#398619: acidbase: postinst fails: No pgsql createuser to execute. (have you
installed postgresql-client?
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 395055 + pending
Bug#395055: [intl:fr] acidbase debconf template translation
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 09:47:18PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So looking at libgeda for bug #400252 brings another RC bug to my attention:
> you have not been changing your library package name in keeping with the
> soname changes of this library, and the shlibs provided by libgeda r
tags 398619 + pending
tags 395055 + pending
thanks
I think the best solution right now is depending on all cmdline clients
supported by the package, until a best solution is adopted. I will
follow the progress of bugs like #353617 and #398634.
I am waiting for my (or other) sponsor to upload the
Package: wwwoffle
Version: 2.9-2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
wwwoffle has the setting:
# lock-files = yes | no
# Enable the use of lock files to stop more than one WWWOFFLE process
# from downloading the same URL at the same time (default=no).
Eithe
Your message dated Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400179: fixed in gnomesword 2.1.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tag 398855 unreproducible help
severity 398855 important
thanks
Hi Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow [2006-11-16 1:27 +0100]:
> rebuilding clanbomber under etch fails with this error:
>
> Exception caught from ClanLib:
> ClanSound: Mixing rate (22.05 kHz) not supported by soundcard.
> make[4]: *** [
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 398855 unreproducible help
Bug#398855: FTBFS: ClanSound: Mixing rate (22.05 kHz) not supported by
soundcard.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, help
> severity 398855 important
Bug#398855: FTBFS: ClanSound: Mixing rate (22.05 kHz)
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
