hi
Even after a clean install v 2.2.3-2 from testing and 2.2.3-3 from
unstable segfault on PowerPC.
[Wed Nov 01 08:22:15 2006] [notice] child pid 2990 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
bhb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:17:20 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396251: fixed in digikamimageplugins 0.9.0~beta3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of vlc_0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 20061101-0450
> **
Package: gambas
Version: 1.0.15-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of gambas_1.0.15-1 on nasya by sbuild/sparc 0.50
> Build started at 20061101-0233
> **
...
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 00:17 am, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:12:17PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > After the recent upload of libsdl1.2-dev downgrading the *-dev
> > dependencies to recommends, lots of packages (for example mednafen,
> > missing a libgl-dev depende
Package: libgl1-mesa-dev
Version: 6.5.1-0.2
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log for arkrpg:
...
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -fno-exceptions -g -O0
-I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -g -Wall -O2 -Wall
-fno-exceptions -g -O0 -c GLRenderer.cpp -fP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 394283 etch-ignore
Bug#394283: thailatex: License is no-commercial
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch-ignore
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
tags 394283 etch-ignore
thanks
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 07:17:16PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> I'm not sure about your policies in these things, but maybe this
> progress already warrants an etch-ignore tag?
Yes, the below seems to warrant an etch-ignore tag under the stated policy.
> "Theppitak
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 396352 libswt-gtk-3.2-java
Bug#396352: azureus: fails to start, NoClassDefFoundError
(org/eclipse/swt/widgets/Display)
Bug reassigned from package `azureus' to `libswt-gtk-3
block 356055 by 396291
thanks
Hi,
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 29 Oct 2006 21:02:52 +0100, a écrit :
> http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/patch-loadlin
>
> this builds, runs, and boots fine!!
I cleaned the patch a bit, it now also compiles with legacy TASM.EXE,
so the patch should be fine to ap
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 356055 by 396291
Bug#356055: loadlin: loadlin.exe cannot be built from source
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 356055 added: 396291
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Ok, I just uploaded a rebuild. Rene, do you want me to close
the bug or reassign it back to OOo?
- Jarno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:50:55 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379552: fixed in webfs 1.21-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 396471 linux-2.6
Bug#396471: linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp: fails to install
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp' to `linux-2.6'.
> merge 396471 395110
Bug#395110: linux-2.6: cannot configure linux-image-2.6.18-1
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 16:19 -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> Sure.
> This bug should normally be closed, as nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 is
> no longer in testing and therefore nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 can't
> FTBFS in testing anymore. However, when nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-2-686 and
> company
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:51:50 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396352: fixed in swt-gtk 3.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
This patch might help:
http://www.fastcgi.com/archives/fastcgi-developers/2005-December/004060.html
Looks like mod_fastcgi uses a deprecated 1.3 interface, and the
compatibility #defines that existed in 2.0 are gone in 2.2.
The patch worked for me (once I worked out that I needed to build th
reassign 396352 libswt-gtk-3.2-java
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 06:55:02PM +0200, Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) wrote:
>Plugins in /usr/share/netdude/plugins and .../protocols should be moved
> to /usr/lib.
The attached diff should _almost_ fix the problem. AFAICS, it should fix the
issues themselves; however, after fiddling with co
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:48:03 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392392: fixed in amarok 1.4.4-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 396480 normal
Bug#396480: installation-reports: D-I does not work on ASUS P5W DH de luxe +
E6600
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Your message dated Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:46:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396480: ASUS P5W DH de luxe + E6600
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:55:45AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:59:18 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> [...]
> > Nope, because you can ship the source code and the object file if you
> > wanted.
> >
> > Already now, major parts of debian/main are not cleanly buildable out
> >
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:21:36 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350754: fixed in mailutils 1:1.1+dfsg1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:59:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:21:56AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > This bug is closed by the new kernel-package version, and linux-2.6 only
> > needs
> > to be rebuilt with it, which is scheduled for -4, and amply discussed here
>
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 10:24:22PM +0200, Jonas Genannt wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Then the test needs fixing, because autobuilders will not necessarily have
> > home directories for the buildd user, and packages need to build correctly
> > in such an environment because they're not suppose
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:21:36 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393396: fixed in mailutils 1:1.1+dfsg1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:17:45 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380728: fixed in apt-watch 0.3.2-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed 18 Oct 2006, Tatsuki Sugiura said:
>I'll upload new version soon, please wait...
Waiting... 8-)
--
Andrew McNamara, Senior Developer, Object Craft
http://www.object-craft.com.au/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:50:19 +0100 Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Mathew
>
> (Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
Again assuming that this means you and Matthew want to be Cc:ed as
well...
[...]
> > That's perfectly acceptable. Upstream can do whatever they want.
> > However,
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:21:56AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> This bug is closed by the new kernel-package version, and linux-2.6 only needs
> to be rebuilt with it, which is scheduled for -4, and amply discussed here
> previously.
Is linux-2.6 binNMU-safe? Could we binNMU linux-2.6 to fix this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package azureus
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: azureus
> tag 396352 confirmed pending
Bug#396352: azureus: fails to start, NoClassDefFoundError
(org/eclipse/swt/widgets/Display)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, pending
> thanks
Stopping
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:59:18 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
> Nope, because you can ship the source code and the object file if you
> wanted.
>
> Already now, major parts of debian/main are not cleanly buildable out
> of the box, due to cyclic bootstraping dependencies.
But those major parts of
Package: installation-reports
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
boot starts, but enter an endless loop resetting the SATA controller when it
tries to find the disks. Also, dmesg shows spurious irq not handled on this
hardware. Apparently fixed via the libata upgrade availab
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:53:01PM -, peter green wrote:
> retitle 394773 minor change needed for compatibility with gaim2.0.0beta4
> thanks
>
> this sounds like an ideal candidate for a nmu, i've changed that title as it
> misleadingly implied that a binnmu would have fixed this.
Hi Tony,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:30:53PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> The problem appears to lie with more recent versions of
> libswt-gtk-3.2-java. The 3.2.1 version of this package ships
> /usr/share/java/swt-gtk-3.2.1.jar, but the config file referenced in the
> azureus startup script (/us
Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /build/buildd/scala-2.1.5/debian/simpbuild.xml:213: Unable to find a
> javac compiler;
> com.sun.tools.javac.Main is not on the classpath.
>
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:27:29 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396466: libsdl-mixer1.2-dev: package dependencies disagree
with libSDL_mixer.la (over libasound and others)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:12:17PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> After the recent upload of libsdl1.2-dev downgrading the *-dev dependencies
> to
> recommends, lots of packages (for example mednafen, missing a libgl-dev
> dependency) have started failing to build from source because they don'
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:54:09PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp
> Version: 2.6.18-3
> Severity: serious
>
> This issue has been reported several times before, but I've not yet seen
> any real response from the kernel team.
>
> Preconfiguring packages ...
>
Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While not a user of sbaz or scala, I made an attempt anyway at
> fixing this RC bug. To start the process I took the orig.tar.gz
> file from the Debian archives and applied the diff and simply
> changed the Build dependency from scala-dev (which is not eve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
BTW: I have been assuming that Moritz is reporting the consensus of the
whole security team , and not only his personal opinion... is it so?
whereas Joey reported the opinion of the release people (that was not
opposite to [A])
I personally may embra
A Mennucc wrote:
> The overhead [O] may simply be not worth the (supposed) future benefit
> for security.
It's not theoretical, but a genuine problem that affects us here and
today. We've had the whole mess for CVE-2005-4048, we're currently
encountering it with CVE-2006-4799/CVE-2006-4800 and we'
Package: celestia
Version: 1.3.2-4
Severity: grave
Celestia crashes on start-up. This applies whether I start from the
Gnome menus or from command line, and whether I use celestia,
celestia-gnome or celestia-glut as the command.
Here's the output from running celestia from a terminal window:
After checking, a binNMU will be sufficient.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:06:50PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Sven
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:32:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> ...CUT...
> > > Will all reverse engineered drivers with hardcoded values be considered
> > > as closed source? Must you always release everything that you kn
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:26:38 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:00:15PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> (Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
Including the From: field (that is you) and the To: field (that is Ola
Lundqvist)? Let's assume the answer i
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp
Version: 2.6.18-3
Severity: serious
This issue has been reported several times before, but I've not yet seen
any real response from the kernel team.
Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously deselected package linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp.
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 396410 important
Bug#396410: grdesktop eats all memory and freezes the whole system
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> tags 396410 unreproducible
Bug#396410: grdesktop eats all memory and freezes the whole system
There were no tags
severity 396410 important
tags 396410 unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:22:25PM +0100, Adalbert Dawid wrote:
> When I launch grdesktop, it eats up the whole memory of my machine
> (1 GB) whithin one or two seconds and freezes the whole system, forcing me
> to do a hard reset. Thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
I would like to add my 2¢ (although Dario's email pretty much says it all)
Here are 3 possible scenarios:
[N] The safest way to linking MPlayer with dynamical FFmpeg would be :
each time there is a MPlayer release, Diego provides us with the corr
see subject.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 396435 important
retitle 396435 subversion: should be buildable as root (failed test when built
as root)
thanks
On 31/10/06 at 15:52 -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Lucas Nussbaum]
> > During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your
> > package failed to build on i38
Hello,
I have performed a security audit of ELOG and here is what I found:
1) There are some incorrect handling of *printf() calls and format
strings. They lead to ELOG crashing completely, with the potential
of executing arbitrary machine code programs, when a user uploads
and submits as the fi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 396435 important
Bug#396435: subversion: FTBFS: test switch_tests.py fails
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> retitle 396435 subversion: should be buildable as root (failed test when
> built as root)
Bug#396435: subversion: FTBFS: t
Package: azureus
Version: 2.5.0.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #396352
The problem appears to lie with more recent versions of
libswt-gtk-3.2-java. The 3.2.1 version of this package ships
/usr/share/java/swt-gtk-3.2.1.jar, but the config file referenced in the
azureus startup script (/usr/bin/azureus) is:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package evolution-data-server
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: evolution-data-server
> tags 295270 unreproducible
Bug#295270: Messages cannot be deleted and index file gets corrupted when there
isn't enough disk space
Tags were: help upstream
Bug#347703
package evolution-data-server
tags 295270 unreproducible
thanks
2006/10/29, Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The problem appears to be that camel_mbox_summary_sync_mbox() in
camel/providers/local/camel-mbox-summary.c marks changes in the summary
as having been applied to the folder as soon as
Package: libsdl-mixer1.2-dev
Version: 1.2.6-1.1+b1
Severity: grave
This bug is strictly similar to libsdl1.2's #396063:
/usr/lib/libSDL_mixer.la refers to many libraries (eg. libasound), which
are not (and should not be) pulled by the package's dependencies.
This makes packages (such as gcompris
retitle 394773 minor change needed for compatibility with gaim2.0.0beta4
thanks
this sounds like an ideal candidate for a nmu, i've changed that title as it
misleadingly implied that a binnmu would have fixed this.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> severity 395961 serious
Bug#395961: Please, include GPL exception in debian/copyright
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Steve Kemp wrote:
> Daniel
>
> Please find attached the patch I'm going to use for the security
> update.
Thanks.
> Could you please apply it, or a comparable patch to the version
> in unstable and let us know which version will fix the problem?
I'll apply your patch, and upload in about
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 395961 pending
Bug#395961: Please, include GPL exception in debian/copyright
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Hi Diego,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:46:01PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> Removing the embedded copies of FFmpeg libraries from MPlayer is a bad
> idea.
For the workload on the security team and the overall quality of Debian
(a single source package for whatever produced binary packages),
I stro
It's been fixed. Upload is on the way.
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 13:29 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Failure to install is RC.
>
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: defrag
Version: 0.73pjm1-8
Severity: grave
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 01:10:50AM +0800, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > So now it was time to defrag, I used this command:
> > thor:~# e2defrag -r /dev/vgraid/data
>
> This program is dangerous to use and any attempts to use it should be
> stopped.
[Lucas Nussbaum]
> During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your
> package failed to build on i386.
Don't build subversion as root.
Can I close this bug?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Sven
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:32:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
...CUT...
> > Will all reverse engineered drivers with hardcoded values be considered
> > as closed source? Must you always release everything that you know
> > when you release somehting as open source?
> > Must we release the i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> severity 391093 important
Bug#391093: ntp upgrade from 1:4.2.2+dfsg.2-2 to 1:4.2.2+dfsg.2-3 fails
Bug#391352: Upgrade problem (user ntp does not exist)
Severity set to `important' fro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 394773 minor change needed for compatibility with gaim2.0.0beta4
Bug#394773: Needs to be rebuilt for gaim 2.0.0beta4
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Package: libsdl1.2-dev
Version: 1.2.11-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
After the recent upload of libsdl1.2-dev downgrading the *-dev dependencies to
recommends, lots of packages (for example mednafen, missing a libgl-dev
dependency) have started failing to build from source because they don't
pr
Tags: patch
Seems like the tmp file isn't needed at all? Possible patch attached.
--
Kees Cook@outflux.net
diff -u thttpd-2.23beta1/debian/thttpd.logrotate
thttpd-2.23beta1/debian/thttpd.logrotate
--- thttpd-2.23beta1/debian/thttpd.logrotate
+++ thtt
Ionut Georgescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Have you altered the sources in any way? Please check your building
> environment. grace 1:5.1.20-3 build OK on all architectures, including
> amd64
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=grace
>
> Ionut
I saw that too and I saw a few more o
Daniel
Please find attached the patch I'm going to use for the security
update.
Could you please apply it, or a comparable patch to the version
in unstable and let us know which version will fix the problem?
Steve
--
# The Debian Security Audit Project.
http://www.debian.org/security/aud
Package: cogito
Version: 0.18-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
Usertags: grid5000
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
I tried to build it several times to make sure the issue wa
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:08:14 -0800 (PST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396345: tomboy: Tomboy does not start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Hi,
I've tried several times (6 times) to rebuild bzr but couldn't reproduce
the failure. The bug might be caused by a race condition. It would be
great if somebody could audit the tests, but I don't mind if it is preferred
to just ignore this bug...
Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:26:59 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394953: fixed in qt4-x11 4.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
seconds
make: *** [debian/stamp-ant-build] Error 1
**
Build finished at 20061031-1802
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Purging
/var/lib/schroot/mount/etch32-636552eb-2ae6-49c5-80a6-bbc7c77457f9/build/root/junitperf-1.9.1
Package: subversion
Version: 1.4.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
Usertags: grid5000
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
Relevant parts:
Running all tests in getopt_tests.py..
Hi
Can you add debug lines to /var/lib/dpkg/info/bootsplash.postinst
to pinpoint on what line you get this problem?
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: zeroc-ice-java
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
Usertags: grid5000
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
Relevant parts:
Checking for source dependency con
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:00:15PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
(Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
> As you say you need the prefered form of _modification_, which means
> that if we change things, we are not allowed to obfuscate it. I can not
> see anything that enfoce th
Hi,
the very best would be to modify the package so that the version is
determined from what version of evolution -dev packages are installed.
That way, a binNMU would be enough.
If that cannot be done, an upload to experimental would be useful so
that the evolution 2.8 transition could be carri
Andrey Fedoseev wrote:
> Package: tomboy
> Version: 0.4.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
...
> When trying to run tomboy I get:
>
> [START]
> ** ERROR **: file threadpool.c: line 990 (mono_thread_pool_init):
> assertion failed: (async_call_klass)
> aborting...
package cheesetracker
tag 396359 moreinfo unreproducible
severity 396359 important
thanks
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 05:00, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Package: cheesetracker
> Version: 0.9.9-8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
How were you doing the build? Was i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package cheesetracker
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cheesetracker
> tag 396359 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#396359: FTBFS: scons: building terminated because of errors.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> severity 396359 imp
Hi Goswin
Thanks for your response, and interesting new view (option C)
on this matter.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:20:44PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...CUT...
> > Let me take two examples:
> > * Person A create a driver by reverse engineering,
Have you altered the sources in any way? Please check your building
environment. grace 1:5.1.20-3 build OK on all architectures, including
amd64
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=grace
Ionut
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 13:28 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Package: grace
> Version: 1:5
Package: grdesktop
Version: 0.23-2+b1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
When I launch grdesktop, it eats up the whole memory of my machine
(1 GB) whithin one or two seconds and freezes the whole system, forcing me
to do a hard reset. This happens *immediately* after
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 05:47:20 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391345: fixed in aoetools 11-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Yes I used apt-get for this. The reason is that I already had bootsplash-theme-debian installed, because I had just removed bootsplash to copy the output so I could send it. I removed both and here is what happens:
# apt-get install bootsplashbootsplash failed to preconfigure, with exit status 10
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:17:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This was fixed quite a long time ago.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Julien Danjou writes:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:38:33PM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I'm a little confused as to how to reproduce the problem.
> > Could you send me the part you cut (...) ?
> > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=poker-network does not show this
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> First I want to tell to you Kyle and Matthew, that this is not a personal
> thing against you, and that I have noted the question mark in the end of the
> subject ("Contains obfuscated source code, DFSG violation?"). I actually want
> to thank you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 354544 grave
Bug#354544: ISAM trap in package upgrade
Bug#354850: mysql-server: upgrade 4.1->5.0 may break installation
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian b
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:38:33PM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hello,
> I'm a little confused as to how to reproduce the problem.
> Could you send me the part you cut (...) ?
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=poker-network does not show this
> build. Can I check it from somewhere e
Hi,
There is a new verion of nice in the archive (0.9.12-2, uploaded just before
your build), which already fixes a FTBFS. Could you please try it? Or is there
an ETA for a new autobuild?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Hi Mathew
(Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:26:38PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:00:15PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> (Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
>
> > As you say you need the p
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:34:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396277: fixed in thttpd 2.23beta1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
